Eng 101 Composition I Rubric For Writing Assessment Essay
Eng 101 Composition I Rubric For Writing Assessment Essay One
Eng 101 – Composition I — Rubric for Writing Assessment – Essay One – 100 points Criterion Factor 10-9 (Level (Level (Level (Level 1) Outstanding Acceptable Developing Failing Content Thesis statement of topic and controlling idea Identifiable, strong statement of the controlling idea (thesis) that enhances the topic discussion Identifiable, clear statement of a controlling idea (thesis) that focuses only through structure Identifiable yet overly broad or weak controlling idea (thesis) Lacks an identifiable or appropriate thesis and/or controlling idea Critical Thinking engagement with the material; demonstrates insightful ideas from a thorough examination and understanding of the topic Balance of source and original ideas shows consistent interaction with the sources and evidence of critical thinking Balance of source and original ideas shows inconsistent interaction with the sources and a decrease in critical thinking Ideas rely too heavily on sources rather than on critical thinking; shows minimal interaction between sources and original ideas Lacks engagement with the material or lacks evidence of critical thinking Development supports the thesis through use of relevant and sufficient evidence and explanation Supports and explains ideas using appropriate, relevant, and objective evidence that applies deductive reasoning and useful distinctions Supports and explains ideas using some relevant, objective evidence that applies some deductive reasoning or useful distinctions Supports and explains ideas by relying on subjective and/or irrelevant information that does not apply deductive reasoning, and distinctions are missing Lacks support, explanation, and development of ideas; lacks reasoning, and/or distinctions Research Integration proper incorporation of credible source material Consistent integration of research that provides analysis; uses a variety of credible sources Integration of research that provides commentary; uses a variety of credible sources Inconsistent integration of research without commentary; does not use a variety of credible sources Lacks integration of research; lacks credible sources Organization Introduction (including thesis) creation of interest and theme Creates strong focus and theme, interesting construction Demonstrates clear focus and theme, straightforward construction Demonstrates weak focus and theme, uninteresting construction Lacks focus, theme, and/or interest Body writing relates to the thesis, fits together, and flows in effective order Writing maintains a unified focus on the thesis with fluid order and effective transitions Writing connects to the thesis but with lapses in focus; uses transitions and displays order Writing occasionally lapses in focus and connection to the thesis; uses ineffective transitions and order Lacks focus, order, and/or transitions Conclusion refocuses reader on theme and controlling idea Uses an effective conclusion strategy; leaves a strong impact on the reader Provides closure but leaves minimal impact on the reader Repeats main points; leaves no impact on the reader Lacks a conclusion or includes an irrelevant conclusion Writing Conventions Rhetorical Strategies purpose, assignment, and audience (voice, tone, word choice, academic language) Addresses purpose and audience; demonstrates excellent use of academic language (style, voice, tone, word choice); fulfills the assignment Awareness of purpose and audience; demonstrates appropriate level of academic language with some minor errors (style, voice, tone, word choice); fulfills the assignment Lapses in awareness of purpose and/or audience, use of non-academic language interferes with readability (style, voice, tone, word choice); lapses in meeting assignment Lacks purpose and/or attention to audience, displaying lack of academic language (style, voice, tone, word choice); does not fulfill assignment APA Document Design in-text citations, references page, formatting Correctly uses in-text citations for all sources; properly formats essay and references page Uses in-text citations to identify sources; formatting and /or references page displays minor errors Frequently missing in-text citations; improperly formats essay and references page Lacks in-text citations; lacks proper formatting; missing or irrelevant references page Surface Features sentence structure, run-ons, fragments, agreement, punctuation, capitalization, spelling, etc.
Demonstrates knowledge and use of conventions; enhances the readability of the essay Uses conventions with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, etc. that do not detract from the readability of the essay Difficulties with readability due to incorrect application of conventions Lacks proper use of conventions; lacks readability Comments: July 15, 2013 ENG 101 Essay #1: Summary Response Essay Instructor: Total Assignment Points: 150 FINAL DRAFT – 100 points – Due: ________________ Process Work – 50 points Pre-Writing – 10 points – Due: _______________ Online Submission of First Draft – 10 points – Due: _______________ Print Copy of First Draft – 10 points – Due: _______________ Peer and Self Review Activities – 10 points – Due: _______________ Instructor Review/Response – 10 points – Due: _______________ Topic: Write an essay based on an instructor-approved article.
Purpose: The purpose of this essay is to provide a comprehensive summary and critical response to the article. Description of Assignment: Summarize the central idea and main claims for your chosen article and objectively respond to specific claims in the article. When drafting the summary section of the essay, consider the following elements: a) Relevant details about the author’s background b) The main idea of the article c) The supporting ideas in the article d) The evidence used to support the main and supporting ideas When drafting the response section of the essay, consider the following elements: a) Discussion of the intended audience for the topic and how well the author speaks to the audience b) Discussion of the strengths and/or flaws of the article c) Discussion of agreements and/or disagreements with the author’s claims Source(s) Required: Source article.
In addition, you will find that researching the topic/issue is helpful in terms of supporting your response to specific claims made by the author, so two additional secondary sources will be required for this essay . NOTE: Reference sources, such as an encyclopedia (e.g. Wikepedia.org) or a dictionary will not count as legitimate sources. This includes reference sites like WebMD.org and About.com. In addition, personal blogs or essays posted on personal websites or self-published on sites like Associatedcontent.com and Helium.com are not acceptable.
CQ Researcher and Issues & Controversies articles are also not acceptable, as they are secondary reference articles. These can be great for a general overview to learn about the issues, but they are not primary sources. Audience: You are writing to an audience of fellow students with comparable knowledge regarding the topic. Length: 2-4 pages excluding title page and reference page, using APA format Additional Information: Although you are responding to an article, this essay is not about the topic/issue as much as it is a direct response to the claims made by the author of the selected article. You should use clear signal phrases (also called author tags) throughout the essay to maintain focus on the specific article rather than the broader topic.
For this essay, your Final Draft will be graded with the ENG 101 standard rubric. While we will discuss this rubric in class, here is a more detailed description of some specific elements I look for when grading this type of essay: · Introduction : There are three parts to every introduction – grabbing attention, revealing the topic, and providing the thesis statement. Suggestions for writing strong attention grabbers can be found in your textbook on pp. 27-30. Revealing the topic requires you to clearly announce the author, title, and date of the article, as well as provide at least a one-sentence summary of the article.
Information on how to write a strong thesis for this type of essay within the Comp textbook on p. 304. · Summary : Write an objective summary that any reader would be able to comprehend. Here you get to put forth what you believe this piece of literature to be about, but you put forth that summary as fact. This means no “I think,†“I feel,†“In my opinion,†etc. · Response : The response is also supposed to be objective rather than personal. This means that you should try to not include personal feelings or opinions about the text.
Instead, focus on the positive and/or negative elements of the article and discuss them by using objective, third person terminology rather than first person pronouns. · Literary References/Research : You will need to include 2-4 short quotations from the actual article. These quotes will serve as “evidence†and will be integrated into the text to support either the summary, the response, or both. As previously mentioned you will also be integrating two outside research sources to support the summary and/or response, but you can paraphrase this research into your own words rather than quote it. · Research Integration : In order to stay connected to the article throughout the entire essay, continually refer back to the article being summarized through the use of signal phrases/author tags, such as, “Goodman (2014) argues that…†or “Goodman (2014) also points out this…â€.
These author tags should appear at least once in every paragraph. · Conclusion : When you come to the conclusion, be sure to reiterate your response to the text and reinforce the thesis, then end with an overall concluding statement to bring closure to the piece and leave readers with a lasting impression. Suggestions for writing conclusions can be found in your textbook on p. 32. · APA Formatting : For this essay you will have consulted at least three research sources, and those sources need to be cited in proper APA format both in-text and on a References page. To be compliant with the general rules for APA formatting, you also need to include a title page, add a header to the entire essay, use 12pt Times New Roman font, double-space the text, have one-inch margins, and include no extra spacing in between paragraphs.
Your book APA: The Easy Way! and the APA Help section on the Baker Library page will be a good citation resources. I suggest that you also use the Library’s APA Essay Template, which is posted in Course Information on Blackboard. **Remember that the Pearson Writer site/app will also be a useful resource for questions you might have about drafting any part of the essay. 1 ABBREVIATED TITLE 3 Full Title of the Paper in Title Case Your Name College Title of the Paper in Title Case First paragraph starts here. This is the actual beginning of the text of the paper. Give the formal, full title in Title Case, exactly as it appears on the title page.
The first paragraph will usually be the introduction. Do not including a heading. Start your second paragraph here. Notice that the page headers appear on all pages of the document. Each page contains the page header and each page is numbered one up consecutively from the title page through the last page of the document.
When properly set up in the Headers and Footers function, your computer will handle the consecutive numbering automatically. Start your third paragraph here. The title page deserves some special mention. Page header are should include Running head, flush left and page number, flush right. Half way down the page, give the following details center-aligned, and double-line spaced.
Full Title of the Paper in Title Case, your full name, and name of the institution, in your case it will be Baker College. Add paragraphs as needed. Start your last paragraph here. This should be the conclusion of the text, talking about your findings or results. This paragraph may have a heading.
References Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (Year). Title of the journal article in sentence case. Name of the Journal in Title Case , vol. (issue), starting page-ending page.
Retrieved from
Retrieved from
A. (Year). Title of the book in sentence case . Publisher city, State: Publisher’s Name.
Paper For Above instruction
The purpose of this essay is to provide a comprehensive summary and critical response to an instructor-approved article, fulfilling academic standards for clarity, analytical depth, and proper formatting. This process involves distilling the article's main ideas, examining the author’s background, and evaluating the supporting evidence and arguments presented. The response must also engage with the intended audience—fellow students with comparable knowledge—by objectively discussing the article’s strengths and flaws, and articulating agreements or disagreements based on research and critical thinking.
The article chosen as the subject of this essay should be summarized thoroughly by identifying the author’s background, main idea, supporting ideas, and evidence. This summary should be objective, factual, and free of personal opinions, allowing any reader to understand the crux of the article. The subsequent critical response involves analyzing the context of the intended audience, evaluating the article’s strengths and weaknesses, and discussing the validity of the claims made by the author.
Research plays a pivotal role in supporting the critical response. Beyond the primary article, two secondary credible sources must be integrated, providing analysis and additional perspectives. These secondary sources should complement the summary and critique, and must adhere to academic credibility standards—personal blogs, Wikipedia, WebMD, and similar sites are unacceptable. Instead, peer-reviewed journals, reputable news outlets, or scholarly books should serve as the basis for supporting evidence. Proper APA citations and references are required for all sources used.
Structurally, the essay begins with an introduction that includes a compelling attention grabber, a clear announcement of the article’s title, author, and publication date, and a thesis statement outlining the focus. The body then summarizes the article objectively, highlighting main ideas, supporting evidence, and notable quotations. The critique section critically evaluates the effectiveness and limitations of the article, discussing the audience engagement, logical coherence, and research backing.
Additionally, the conclusion reiterates the writer’s stance, reflects on the overall significance of the article, and offers final insights to leave a lasting impression. Throughout the paper, transparent integration of quotations and in-text citations follows APA guidelines—author tags are included in every paragraph to ensure clarity. A correctly formatted reference page lists all consulted sources, demonstrating adherence to APA standards and supporting the credibility of the writing.
References
- Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (Year). Title of the journal article in sentence case. Name of the Journal in Title Case, volume(issue), page range. http://doi.org/xxxxx
- Author, C. C. (Year). Title of the book in sentence case. Publisher city, State: Publisher’s Name.
- Organization Name. (Year). Title of the webpage in sentence case. Website Name. Retrieved from
- Author, D. D. (Year, Month Date). Title of the newspaper article in sentence case. Newspaper Name. Retrieved from
- Author, E. E. (n.d.). Title of the online document in sentence case. Website Name. Retrieved from