Eng 210 Dr. Motai Topic 2 Persuasive Online Speech

Eng 210 Dr Motai Topic 2persuasiveonlinepersuasive Speech Assignme

Choose a controversial topic that is important and that you really care about. Have a clear position on your topic —for or against, yes or no, etc. You can’t have a “middle of the road” position. Read at least two factual articles about your topic, and consider using a personal experience if it supports your arguments (reasons). Attempt to persuade your audience that your position is the correct one by presenting the reasons why your audience should support your position. State a common argument against your position (called a counter argument) and explain why it’s wrong. Conclude with an ‘appeal’: tell your audience what they can or should do to help.

Your overall goal is to convince your audience that your position is the one they should support and take action on. You will convince your audience by:

  • being decisive about your position
  • presenting clear reasons, reliable facts and possible personal experience
  • speaking with enthusiasm and conviction
  • TIME LIMIT: 3:00 minutes minimum—4 minutes maximum. Strict time limits!

WHAT YOU’LL SUBMIT FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

  1. “My Persuasive Speech Topic With Links to My Research Articles”
  2. “Research Article Reports”
  3. “Persuasive Speech Type-In Final Outline (Template on iLearn)”
  4. Note Cards (use PowerPoint slides)

Paper For Above instruction

Title: The Critical Need to Implement Universal Vaccination Policies

Introduction

In recent years, the significance of vaccination as a public health tool has come into sharp focus, especially amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite overwhelming scientific evidence advocating for universal vaccination, resistance rooted in misinformation and personal beliefs threatens the health of communities worldwide. As a committed public health advocate, I firmly believe that implementing mandatory vaccination policies is essential to safeguarding collective health and preventing preventable disease outbreaks. This essay aims to persuade readers of the urgent need for universal vaccination policies by presenting compelling reasons, addressing common counterarguments, and outlining actionable steps.

Supporting Reasons and Evidence

First, numerous scientific studies demonstrate that vaccines are safe and highly effective in preventing disease. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), vaccines prevent approximately 2-3 million deaths globally each year (CDC, 2021). A study published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases showed that measles vaccination led to an 85% reduction in measles cases worldwide over a decade (Moss, 2017). These facts underscore the undeniable benefits of immunization programs, which have substantially reduced disease morbidity and mortality.

Second, herd immunity protects vulnerable populations who cannot be vaccinated, such as infants, the elderly, and immunocompromised individuals. Herd immunity requires a high percentage of the population to be vaccinated to interrupt disease transmission. The World Health Organization (WHO) states that achieving 95% vaccination coverage for measles is critical to prevent outbreaks (WHO, 2019). Failing to vaccinate enough people jeopardizes community health, especially for those most at risk.

Third, personal experiences highlight the importance of vaccination. As a healthcare worker, I witnessed firsthand the devastation caused by measles outbreaks in unvaccinated communities. Children suffering from severe complications emphasize the moral obligation to promote widespread immunization. Personal stories humanize abstract statistics and reinforce the ethical responsibility to protect public health.

Counterarguments and Rebuttal

Critics argue that mandatory vaccination infringes on individual rights and freedoms. They contend that forced vaccinations violate personal autonomy and bodily integrity. However, public health emergencies demand collective action to protect society at large. Just as laws enforce seatbelt use and prohibit smoking in public spaces for safety reasons, vaccination mandates serve the greater good. The Constitution permits restrictions on individual freedoms when essential for public health (Gostin & Wiley, 2016). Therefore, the rights of the many override the rights of the few who refuse vaccination.

Conclusion and Call to Action

In conclusion, universal vaccination policies are scientifically justified, ethically necessary, and vital for community health. To effectively combat preventable diseases, governments and public health entities must implement and enforce these policies. Individuals can contribute by staying informed, dispelling myths, and encouraging others to vaccinate. Together, we can build healthier communities and prevent needless suffering caused by vaccine-preventable diseases. The time to act is now—vaccinate, advocate, and protect our collective future.

References

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2021). Vaccine Effectiveness. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vaccine-effectiveness/index.html
  • Gostin, L. O., & Wiley, L. F. (2016). Public Health Law: Power, Duty, Restraint. University of California Press.
  • Moss, W. J. (2017). Measles. The New England Journal of Medicine, 376(20), 1907-1918.
  • World Health Organization (WHO). (2019). Measles Fact Sheet. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/measles

Related Assignments