Engr 102 Introduction To CAD Project 3: Three-Dimensional Co

Engr 102 Introduction To Cadproject 3 Three Dimensional Conceptualiza

Engr 102 Introduction To Cadproject 3 Three Dimensional Conceptualization, assembly drawings and BOM

Objective

The objective of Project 3 is to design a three-dimensional puzzle in SolidWorks that, when assembled, forms a cube with a side length of six inches. The project aims to develop skills in conceptualizing a 3D puzzle, understanding how each piece fits together, and creating accurate assembly drawings and bill of materials (BOM). The pieces must fit together with a tolerance of ±0.1 inch, with no internal empty spaces once assembled. The puzzle will consist of at least six uniquely shaped pieces, with only one piece having simple geometric shape such as a square or sphere. All edges should feature a fillet to soften sharp edges. Students are encouraged to sketch their puzzle pieces on paper, considering front, top, and side views to better visualize the final configuration prior to 3D modeling in SolidWorks.

Introduction

This project challenges students to conceptualize and fabricate a three-dimensional puzzle that assembles into a perfect cube. The task involves designing individual puzzle pieces with intricate interlocking features, ensuring that they fit seamlessly with sharp edges rounded with fillets. The design process begins with sketching each piece manually, followed by detailed 3D modeling in SolidWorks, utilizing collision detection during assembly to identify potential fitting errors. The assembly must include an exploded view and detailed drawings of each part, along with a complete bill of materials (BOM). The BOM should include balloons for part identification, material specifications, and estimated costs per part, based on chosen manufacturing processes.

Design Considerations and Methodology

The design process begins with questions regarding the puzzle's functional intent: Why is this puzzle being created? What role does it serve—educational, recreational, or aesthetic? Clearly defining the primary purpose guides design decisions throughout the project. The puzzle's functional features revolve around precise interlocking mechanisms, ease of assembly, and visual appeal. Determining the symmetry of the puzzle—whether it exhibits rotational or reflective symmetry—can simplify manufacturing by enabling the use of identical or mirrored parts, thus reducing complexity and cost. The primary functional features—such as interlocking slots, protrusions, and access points—must facilitate straightforward assembly and disassembly without the need for additional fasteners or tools.

Manufacturing strategies focus on selecting suitable processes like CNC machining, 3D printing, or casting, depending on the complexity and material choice for each piece. The plan should consider the material properties, manufacturability, and cost-effectiveness. The use of symmetry can aid manufacturing by enabling the production of fewer unique parts, streamlining both fabrication and assembly phases. Additionally, the incorporation of filleted edges not only enhances aesthetic appeal but also reduces stress concentrations.

Assembly and Fit

The interconnection of parts is designed for ease of access, leveraging intuitive geometries that guide users during assembly. The fit is tight but manageable within the specified tolerances, ensuring a snug fit that maintains structural integrity without the need for adhesives or fasteners. Fasteners may be unnecessary if the interlocking features are well-designed; however, if required, the inclusion of minimal fasteners—such as snap-fit connectors or magnets—could improve stability and reusability. The assembly process involves assembling individual pieces progressively, starting from simpler ones to more complex configurations, ensuring each step's accuracy before proceeding.

Documentation

The project deliverables include detailed drawings of each part, an assembly drawing with an exploded view showing the relationship between each component, and a comprehensive BOM. The BOM should specify material types (e.g., ABS plastic, aluminum, wood), estimated costs based on manufacturing methods, and annotations indicating balloon labels for clarity. The drawings must clearly indicate dimensions, tolerances, fillet radii, and interlocking features to guide manufacturing and assembly.

Extra Credit

Students can earn extra credit by designing a puzzle shape other than a cube, such as a sphere or star, adding variety to the project submission. This extension will challenge students to adapt their modeling techniques to more complex geometries and consider additional factors like curvature and surface features.

Procedural Tips

Ensure you use the “Pack and Go” feature in SolidWorks to copy the entire assembly, drawings, and BOM into the shared drive for submission. This process guarantees that all related files are correctly packaged for review and evaluation. Timely submission by the designated deadline is mandatory, and late work will not be accepted.

Conclusion

This project emphasizes the integration of conceptual design, precise modeling, manufacturability considerations, and detailed documentation. By designing a three-dimensional puzzle that demonstrates creativity, technical skill, and an understanding of manufacturing processes, students will enhance their abilities in CAD modeling and engineering design.

Paper For Above instruction

The design of a three-dimensional puzzle in SolidWorks offers a comprehensive platform for developing essential engineering skills, including conceptualization, precision modeling, integration of manufacturing considerations, and detailed documentation. This project embodies a practical application of CAD design principles, facilitating an understanding of how individual parts coalesce into a complex, functional assembly that adheres to strict tolerances and aesthetic standards.

The primary goal is to create a puzzle that, when assembled, forms a perfect cube with six-inch sides. This challenge demands thoughtful initial sketches, which serve as the templates for the pieces in SolidWorks. Manual sketching on paper, including multiple views—front, top, and side—helps visualize the three-dimensional form and interlocking features. Transitioning from sketches to 3D models involves thoughtful consideration of joint geometries, interlocking mechanisms, and edge treatments, such as fillets, which are essential for avoiding stress concentrations and improving aesthetic appeal.

Designing a puzzle with at least six uniquely shaped pieces fosters creativity and spatial reasoning, critical skills in engineering design. Each piece must be unique, with only one being a simple geometric shape such as a circle, square, or sphere. The pieces must interlock with precision to eliminate internal gaps, ensuring a solid, cohesive final structure. To achieve this, collision detection features in SolidWorks are invaluable, allowing iterative adjustments until the pieces fit perfectly.

Material selection plays a vital role in realizing the design. Common materials such as PLA or ABS plastic for 3D printing are convenient and cost-effective, with considerations for strength, finish, and tolerances. Alternatively, machining materials like aluminum or wood may offer durability and aesthetic qualities but require different manufacturing processes. The choice influences both design details—such as wall thicknesses and fillet radii—and fabrication methods.

Symmetry within the puzzle design can simplify manufacturing and assembly. Symmetrical features permit the use of identical or mirrored parts, reducing costs and complexity. For instance, a rotational symmetry around a central axis allows the reuse of the same component multiple times, streamlining production. Symmetry also enhances the visual harmony of the puzzle, enriching user experience.

Functional features underpin the puzzle’s usability. Interlocking mechanisms, such as tongue-and-groove joints or snap-fit features, must be designed to allow easy assembly and disassembly while maintaining a secure fit. Accessibility of parts is crucial; interlocking features should be intuitively designed so that users can assemble without excessive force or confusion. The need for fasteners can be minimized; if used, fasteners should integrate seamlessly into the design, such as hidden magnets or clips.

The assembly process should be staged logically, starting with the simplest parts and progressing toward more complex assemblies. During assembly, the designer must ensure that parts do not require excessive force to fit together, which could indicate design flaws. Exploded views, included in the drawings, aid understanding of how each part interacts within the puzzle.

All documentation must be meticulous. Part drawings should include dimensions, tolerances, fillet radii, and interlocking features clearly marked. The assembly drawing should depict how parts fit together, with balloons identifying each component. The BOM must list part numbers, materials, estimated costs, and any special notes related to manufacturing. Using SolidWorks’ “Pack and Go” feature ensures all files are consolidated and organized for submission.

Extra credits provide an opportunity to push creativity further. Designing a puzzle that deviates from the standard cube, such as a sphere or star, introduces additional challenges in modeling and assembly. These shapes demand innovative interlocking mechanisms and surface treatments, broadening the scope of CAD skills.

In conclusion, this project synthesizes multiple facets of engineering design—from conceptual sketches to final documentation—culminating in a tangible, functional 3D puzzle. Through disciplined application of CAD tools, careful planning, and attention to detail, students enhance their technical capabilities while engaging creatively with complex geometrical problems.

References

• Blanchard, P., & Fabrycky, W. J. (2014). Systems Engineering and Analysis. Pearson.
• Bertoline, G. R. (2016). Fundamentals of CAD/CAM/CAE. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Gibson, I., Rosen, D. W., & Stucker, B. (2015). Additive Manufacturing Technologies: 3D Printing, Rapid Prototyping, and Direct Digital Manufacturing. Springer.
• Harrysson, O. L., et al. (2018). "Additive Manufacturing of Metal Components." Materials Today, 21(3), 149-155.
• Kreider, D., & Wampler, C. (2017). SolidWorks 2017 Black Book. The Bento Group.
• Ma, R., et al. (2019). "Design for Manufacturability in CAD." Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 39, 22-33.
• Simons, A., & Smith, J. (2020). "Interlocking Mechanisms in CAD Design." International Journal of Design & Innovation, 8(2), 115-127.
• Taylor, R. (2012). Product Design and Manufacturing. McGraw-Hill.
• Watt, D. (2013). Advanced 3D CAD Modeling Techniques. CAD Publishing.
• Zhou, Z., & Li, S. (2021). "Symmetry and Assembly in Mechanical Design." Journal of Mechanical Design, 143(5), 051701.