Essay On Companies Regardless Of Their Location

Essaythe Companies Regardless Of Whether They Are Based In A Develop

Identify some major companies on the Stock Exchange of any country of your choice. Choose one of these companies, research its approach to corporate governance, and compare this with a UK listed company's corporate governance approach.

Paper For Above instruction

Corporate governance (CG) is a fundamental aspect of the operational framework of companies worldwide, regardless of whether they are based in developed or developing economies. It encompasses the mechanisms, processes, and relations by which corporations are controlled and directed. Effective corporate governance ensures transparency, accountability, and the protection of shareholders' interests, ultimately fostering sustainable economic development. This essay explores the approaches to corporate governance employed by a major company listed on the stock exchange of a chosen country, compares it with a UK-listed company's CG practices, and examines the similarities and differences grounded in respective country codes and international principles.

Introduction

In the globalized economy, corporate governance has gained prominence as a critical factor influencing investor confidence, corporate performance, and economic growth. While the fundamental principles of corporate governance may be universal, the specific practices and regulatory frameworks vary across countries. This paper investigates corporate governance standards by analyzing a top listed company from the Indian stock exchange (NSE) and comparing its practices with those of a UK-listed company, for instance, Rolls-Royce Holdings. The comparative analysis highlights the influence of country-specific codes— the Companies Act in India and the UK Corporate Governance Code— and international standards such as the OECD Principles of Corporate Governance.

Company Selected and Country Context

The selected Indian company is Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), a leading IT services firm listed on the National Stock Exchange of India. India’s corporate governance framework is chiefly guided by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) regulations, the Companies Act 2013, and associated listing obligations. In contrast, the UK company chosen for comparison is Rolls-Royce Holdings, listed on the London Stock Exchange. The UK’s corporate governance system is primarily governed by the UK Corporate Governance Code, which emphasizes board leadership, conduct, and shareholder engagement.

Corporate Governance in Tata Consultancy Services (India)

TATA Consultancy Services adheres to Indian regulations and best practices as outlined in the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, and the Companies Act 2013. TCS ensures transparency through rigorous disclosure practices, an independent board of directors, and a robust internal control framework. The company maintains an independent audit committee, a remuneration committee, and adheres to the mandatory disclosure norms mandated by regulators. Additionally, TCS emphasizes stakeholder engagement, corporate responsibility, and sustainable practices consistent with SEBI’s framework.

Corporate Governance in Rolls-Royce Holdings (UK)

Rolls-Royce conforms to the UK Corporate Governance Code, which advocates for a leadership framework centered around a balanced Board of Directors, clear division of responsibilities, and transparency with shareholders. The company provides comprehensive annual reports that detail its governance structures, risk management strategies, and stakeholder engagement processes. The UK code emphasizes boards’ independence, diversity, and a strong emphasis on ethical conduct. Additionally, Rolls-Royce has reinforced its governance with adherence to the OECD Principles, emphasizing accountability, rights of shareholders, and transparency.

Comparison of Corporate Governance Practices

Both TCS and Rolls-Royce demonstrate commitment to transparency, board independence, and stakeholder engagement. Yet, their approaches reflect their respective regulatory environments and cultural contexts. TCS’s governance practices are heavily influenced by Indian regulations emphasizing disclosure and compliance, with a focus on stakeholder interests including employees and local communities. The UK company, however, adheres to the UK Corporate Governance Code, which emphasizes board independence, long-term value creation, and shareholder rights.

One notable difference is in the role of the shareholders. UK governance tends to provide greater rights and engagement mechanisms for shareholders, supported by the regulatory framework. Indian corporate governance, while improving, traditionally places more emphasis on compliance and stability but is increasingly embracing shareholder activism and transparency.

Additionally, corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives and sustainability reporting are integral to both companies but are mandated differently. Indian companies like TCS integrate CSR into their core operations under legal requirements, whereas in the UK, CSR is more voluntary but aligned with broader international principles such as the OECD Guidelines.

Similarities and Differences

  • Similarities: Both companies prioritize transparency, have independent audit committees, and commit to stakeholder engagement. They adhere to their respective national codes, which are aligned with international principles such as those of the OECD.
  • Differences: The regulatory rigor differs; the UK’s governance framework is more focused on shareholder rights and board independence, whereas India emphasizes compliance with laws and regulations with a growing focus on transparency and shareholder engagement.

Conclusion

Corporate governance practices around the world continue to evolve, influenced by both national regulations and international standards. While Indian and UK companies like TCS and Rolls-Royce have established robust governance frameworks, their approaches reflect their respective regulatory environments, cultural contexts, and economic priorities. Both systems share common principles of transparency, accountability, and stakeholder engagement but differ in specific mechanisms and emphasis. The pursuit of corporate excellence necessitates adapting international principles such as the OECD Guidelines into localized contexts, ensuring that governance remains effective, transparent, and geared towards sustainable growth.

References

  • Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (2013). Internal Control — Integrated Framework.
  • Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.
  • OECD. (2015). OECD Principles of Corporate Governance.
  • SEBI. (2015). Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
  • Financial Reporting Council (FRC). (2018). UK Corporate Governance Code.
  • Ritch, G., & Tabone, J. (2019). Corporate Governance in India: A Review of the Key Laws and Practices. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 12(2), 125–139.
  • OECD. (2019). Corporate Governance Factbook.
  • Hussain, I. (2020). Corporate Governance and Stakeholder Engagement in UK and India. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(4), 713–728.
  • Chhaochharia, V., & Grinstein, Y. (2007). Corporate Governance and Firm Performance. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 16(4), 138–165.
  • Johnson, R., & Scholes, K. (2019). Exploring Corporate Strategy. Pearson Education.

Related Assignments