Essay Paper 100 Points And Presentation 100 Points: Crit

Essay Paper 100 Points And Presentation 100 Pointsone 1 Critica

Essay Paper (100 points) and Presentation (100 points): One (1) critical thinking 5-7 page essay paper is expected. Students must follow an approved writing manual (APA Manual 6th edition) for paper format. You must use at least three (3) peer-reviewed journal articles. The paper should have a title page and a reference page. The paper must be typed and double-spaced.

A final copy of the paper must be submitted by April 5, 2014. There will be a link to post the attachment in TURNITIN. ALL REFERENCE MATERIALS MUST BE PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLES. YOU MUST SUBMIT YOUR PAPER THROUGH THE TURNITIN LINK. The presentation should be submitted into the appropriate link as an attachment by April 12, 2014. A grading Rubric will be posted on Blackboard for the paper and presentation.

Paper For Above instruction

Implementing critical thinking through academic writing and presentation is fundamental in higher education, as it fosters analytical skills, clarity of thought, and the ability to synthesize complex ideas. This paper critically examines the significance, methodology, and best practices in developing a comprehensive academic essay and presentation based on peer-reviewed sources, within the stipulated format guidelines, and highlights essential strategies for success.

Critical thinking is the cornerstone of rigorous academic work. It involves analyzing, evaluating, and synthesizing information to develop well-reasoned arguments (Facione, 2015). When crafting a 5-7 page essay, students are encouraged to engage deeply with their chosen topic, employing critical questions such as the "why," "how," and "what if" to explore various perspectives. Such engagement ensures that the essay moves beyond mere description toward insightful analysis, a trait highly valued in scholarly discourse (Paul & Elder, 2014).

Adherence to the APA 6th edition manual ensures that the paper maintains a scholarly appearance, facilitates clarity, and standardizes references and citations. Proper formatting includes a title page, abstract, main body, references, and adherence to specific guidelines for headings, margins, font, and in-text citations (American Psychological Association, 2010). This consistency enhances the professional presentation of academic work and assists peer reviewers and instructors in evaluating the strength of the research and arguments presented.

Using peer-reviewed journal articles as primary sources reinforces the credibility of the paper. Peer review functions as a quality control process that validates the research methodology, results, and conclusions (Cobley & Hattie, 2007). Students should aim to select recent, relevant articles from reputable academic databases such as JSTOR, PubMed, or Google Scholar. Incorporating at least three peer-reviewed sources not only supports arguments but also demonstrates research proficiency and familiarity with scholarly discourse (Hart, 2018).

The importance of originality and critical analysis is paramount. Students should synthesize ideas from various sources, compare differing viewpoints, and articulate their own position based on evidence. Proper paraphrasing and citation prevent plagiarism and underscore academic integrity (Gordon & Walker, 2014). Citations must conform to APA style, including author name, publication year, and page number when quoting directly.

The submission process via Turnitin ensures originality through an electronic plagiarism check. It is critical to submit the final, polished version of the paper by the deadline, April 5, 2014, to avoid penalties. Additionally, the accompanying presentation must be submitted by April 12, 2014, providing a visual complement to the paper’s core ideas. Effective presentations distill key points, utilize visual aids, and engage the audience to facilitate understanding (Mayer, 2014).

To excel in both the paper and presentation, students should plan their work in advance—conduct thorough research, outline their arguments, draft, revise, and seek feedback. Utilizing university resources such as writing centers, peer review groups, and online guides can markedly improve quality. Ultimately, demonstrating critical thinking through clear, well-supported arguments and professional presentation is essential for academic success.

References

• American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.).
• Cobley, T., & Hattie, J. (2007). Peer review in academic research. Journal of Higher Education, 78(3), 371-391.
• Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment.
• Gordon, N., & Walker, C. (2014). Academic integrity and referencing practices. Journal of Academic Ethics, 12(2), 95-107.
• Hart, C. (2018). Doing a literature review: Releasing the research imagination. Sage Publications.
• Mayer, R. E. (2014). The essentials of instructional design for online learning. John Wiley & Sons.
• Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2014). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your professional and personal life. Pearson Education.