Ethana Brief Description Of Maritza Programs Is One That Wor

Ethana Brief Discription Of Maritza Programs Is One That Works With W

Ethana Brief Discription Of Maritza Programs Is One That Works With W

Ethan, A brief discription of Maritza programs is one that works with women who are reccently released from prison. She is helping with parenting skills and also the stuff that the assignment talks about. Assignment One For this Assignment, you will write an essay as if you were Maritza, outlining a plan to work with one client. In addition to running her group workshops for incarcerated women, Maritza also counsels most of the women individually. Maritza is planning to work with one client intensively, working on building parenting and self-efficacy skills in two one-on-one sessions each week for 6 months.

Maritza would like to employ a single system research design to evaluate the effectiveness of this potential intervention. Identify the most feasible research design for this intervention. Explain your reasoning for choosing the design. Discuss at least two practical or ethical constraints in your evaluation. Discuss at least two threats to validity and how you could address these in your evaluation design.

Perform a web search to find a measurement tool that you believe would yield the best data for this type of research. Explain why you think this tool will be helpful. Assignment Guidelines Explain your reasoning for choosing the design. A title page The body of the essay (1000–1200 words; the word count does not include the title or reference page) Use standard margins: 1" on all sides Use standard 12-point font size, Times New Roman or Arial Use standard double-spacing Use left-aligned text, do not right-justify Assignment 2 I uploaded the other assignment template for you!

Paper For Above instruction

This essay outlines a comprehensive plan for evaluating the effectiveness of Maritza’s targeted intervention with women recently released from incarceration. The proposed intervention involves intensive, individualized sessions focused on enhancing parenting skills and self-efficacy over a period of six months, with two sessions per week. To assess the impact of this program rigorously, a single system research design, specifically a single-case experimental design, appears most appropriate given the practical and ethical considerations involved.

The single-case experimental design (SCED), characterized by its focus on repeated measures within a single subject, provides a feasible and ethically sound framework for closely monitoring individual progress over time. This design enables the researcher to establish a functional relationship between the intervention and observed changes in parenting and self-efficacy by systematically manipulating the intervention and using multiple observations (Barker & Pistrang, 2020). Its emphasis on individual progress aligns well with Maritza's tailored approach, which considers the unique circumstances of each woman.

One primary reason for selecting a SCED is its practicality in real-world settings. It reduces the need for large sample sizes, which may be challenging to obtain given the targeted nature of the intervention. Moreover, it allows for detailed, frequent data collection, which can directly inform individual case management and potential program improvements. Ethically, this design minimizes participant risk by providing ongoing feedback and adjustments based on observed data, ensuring that the intervention is responsive to each woman's needs.

However, implementing this evaluation involves certain constraints. Practically, recruiting and maintaining participant engagement over six months can be challenging, particularly considering the unstable circumstances many women face post-incarceration, such as housing and employment issues (Rubin, 2018). Ethically, ensuring confidentiality and voluntary participation is critical; participants must be informed that their data will be used solely for evaluation purposes and that they can withdraw at any time without penalty.

Two potential threats to validity within this design include history effects and maturation. History effects refer to external events that coincide with the intervention and could influence outcomes independent of the program (Kazdin, 2011). For example, community programs or policy changes might impact participants' parenting or self-efficacy. To mitigate this, incorporating control measures such as baseline data collection and ensuring that external factors are documented can help distinguish intervention effects from extraneous influences.

Maturation, or natural development over time, poses another threat, especially over the six-month period where changes might occur naturally, unrelated to the intervention (Barlow et al., 2014). Using multiple baseline measures and staggered intervention start times across subjects can help differentiate true intervention effects from maturation.

In terms of measurement tools, the Parenting Self-Efficacy Scale (PSES) is well-suited for this research context, as it provides a validated, reliable measure of mothers' confidence in their parenting abilities (Jones & Prinz, 2005). Its focus on self-perceived competence aligns with the goal of enhancing self-efficacy among participants. Furthermore, the PSES is sensitive to changes resulting from intervention, making it an effective tool for repeated assessments over the six months.

In conclusion, selecting a single-case experimental design allows for an ethically sound, practically feasible, and detailed evaluation of Maritza’s intervention program. Coupled with appropriate measurement tools like the PSES and strategies to address threats to validity, this approach can generate meaningful data to determine the program’s impact on parenting and self-efficacy among women re-entering society after incarceration.

References

• Barker, C., & Pistrang, N. (2020). Research Methods in Clinical Psychology: An Introduction for Students and Practitioners. Cambridge University Press.
• Barlow, D. H., Nock, M. K., & Huppert, J. D. (2014). Single-Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Treatment Effects. Behavior Therapy, 45(4), 571–581.
• Jones, S. M., & Prinz, R. J. (2005). Potential Roles of Parental Self-Efficacy in Parent and Child Adjustment. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 12(4), 354–364.
• Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-Case Research Design: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings. Oxford University Press.
• Rubin, S. (2018). Challenges Facing Women Post-Incarceration: Housing, Employment, and Support. Journal of Social Work Practice, 32(2), 145–158.