Ethical Reasoning: Close 1, 2, 3, 4 Please Read These Assign
Ethical Reasoningwlo 3 Clos 1 2 3 4please Read These Assignme
Please read these assignment instructions before writing your paper as they contain very precise and specific instructions on both the content and format requirements. You should download the provided outline and use that to structure your paper, and consult the assignment guidance and modeled example for additional help. Finally, before submitting your assignment please use the checklist to ensure that you have completed all of the requirements.
This course has three written assignments that build upon one another and are designed to take you step-by-step through a process of writing a paper that identifies an ethical question, examines the context, issues, and arguments surrounding the question, and attempts to defend an answer to that question using strong moral reasoning.
In the Week 1 assignment, “Ethical Question,” you chose an ethical question, provided an introduction, a position statement and supporting reason, and an opposing position statement and supporting reason. In the Week 3 assignment, “Applying an Ethical Theory,” you explained utilitarianism, deontology, or virtue ethics, including its core moral principle or ideal, and applied that theory to the topic by demonstrating how its principles would support a particular position on your ethical question. In this final written assignment, you will combine what you have done in these two exercises by examining an ethical issue and defending your own position on an ethical question regarding that issue.
This final written assignment should be written in essay form with the following clearly labeled sections: Introduction, Ethical Argument Explanation and Defense, Objection and Response, and Conclusion. The paper should be between 1,300 and 1,500 words, utilize three scholarly resources, and include a title page and reference page.
Paper For Above instruction
Part 1: Introduction
Begin with your ethical question, introduce the topic and paper, and close with a thesis statement. The ethical question may be the same as your Week 3 written assignment (“Applying an Ethical Theory”) or a revised version of it. The introduction should reflect your additional thinking on the issue and question. End this section with a clear thesis statement that states your position on the issue (the answer to the ethical question you believe is strongest) and provides a brief summary of the main ideas you will be presenting in the paper.
Part 2: Ethical Argument
Present the strongest argument supporting your position stated in the introduction. This should resemble the “supporting reasons” from your first assignment but should incorporate your research into the key ethical issues, arguments on different sides, and the moral reasoning theories studied in class. Think of this as an attorney’s main case to convince a jury of your position, detailing the ethical considerations and implications involved.
Part 3: Explanation and Defense
Explain and defend your argument by drawing on the moral theory that most closely aligns with it. Describe the theory’s historical background, associated philosophers, core moral principles, and how it guides moral reasoning. Show explicitly how your argument is an application of this moral framework. If, for example, your argument is utilitarian, demonstrate how utilitarian principles support your position, referencing the theory’s core tenets such as maximizing happiness and utility.
Part 4: Objection and Response
Present the strongest objection to your argument, linking it to a different ethical theory that offers a contrasting perspective—such as utilitarianism if your argument is based on virtue ethics. Explain the core principle of this opposing theory and how it could challenge your view. Then, respond by explaining why your original argument withstands this objection, emphasizing the strengths of your chosen moral framework in the context of the issue.
Part 5: Conclusion
Summarize what you have accomplished in each section: your main argument, its philosophical foundation, the objection raised, and your response. Highlight how your analysis contributes to understanding the ethical issue and your reasoned stance on it.
Resource Requirements: Use at least three scholarly sources, only one of which may be the textbook. All sources must be cited in-text and included on the references page, formatted according to APA style. The paper should be 1,300–1,500 words, include a title and reference page, and be formatted in APA style with the appropriate title page. Incorporate academic voice and ensure your references are credible, peer-reviewed sources.
Ensure your submission adheres to the specified length, format, and scholarly standards for a comprehensive and well-reasoned ethical analysis.