Ethics 101 Capstone Essay Grading Rubric Criteria And Levels

Ethc 101capstone Essay Grading Rubriccriterialevels Of Achievementcont

Write a capstone essay that synthesizes the knowledge and skills developed in the course, combining insights from the third and fourth discussion boards into a single, well-structured academic paper of 2200 to 2400 words. The essay should clearly state your metaethical position, detail your chosen metaethical theory, apply it to an ethical issue discussed in class, and reflect on your thesis. Use current Turabian formatting, including a title page, table of contents, footnotes, and bibliography. The paper must be double-spaced, with 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and a total length (including all components) within 2400 words. Incorporate at least the sources used in the class, with proper citations provided via footnotes and listed in the bibliography. Address potential objections, provide detailed explanations, and argue convincingly for your moral stance. The final paragraph should summarize your accomplishments and how you achieved your thesis. Ensure the paper is thoroughly proofread to be free of grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. Adhere strictly to the page and component requirements and formatting standards outlined in the instructions.

Paper For Above instruction

The final project for ETHC 101 is a comprehensive capstone essay that integrates the conceptual understanding of metaethics acquired during the course and applies it to a specific ethical issue. This paper must serve as a culmination of the student's analytical and argumentative skills, demonstrating a mastery of both theoretical frameworks and practical applications. The task involves selecting a metaethical position discussed in the course, explicating it in detail, and then applying it thoughtfully to a relevant ethical dilemma, supported by scholarly sources and class materials.

To begin, the paper should include an introductory paragraph that explicitly states the metaethical stance the student intends to defend, the applied ethics issue being addressed, and the conclusions aimed for in the discussion. This sets the thematic foundation for the entire paper and guides the subsequent analysis. For example, a student might choose moral realism as their metaethical framework and apply it to the ethical considerations surrounding euthanasia. The introduction must be clear, concise, and precise, establishing the thesis and the scope of the paper.

The core of the paper involves a comprehensive explanation and argumentation of the selected metaethical theory. This section should cover key concepts, distinctions, and debates associated with the theory. For instance, if the student chooses moral realism, they should explain its claim that moral facts are objective and mind-independent, referencing relevant philosophical texts and scholars like Russ Shafer-Landau or Richard Boyd. The explanation should demonstrate understanding and engagement, responding to common objections and contrasting the theory with alternative metaethical perspectives such as moral anti-realism or constructivism.

Next, the paper should transition smoothly into applying this metaethical framework to the specific ethical issue selected, perhaps from the class discussions or chosen by the student. The application requires a detailed argument that incorporates the theoretical insights to analyze the ethical dilemma. Using our previous example, this would involve demonstrating how moral realism entails specific moral obligations or assessments regarding euthanasia, discussing the implications of moral objectivism in making moral judgments about end-of-life decisions. This section should include nuanced reasoning, addressing potential counterarguments and objections from alternative viewpoints.

The conclusion should synthesize the analysis by recapping the main points, reinforcing how the selected metaethical stance provides a robust basis for addressing the issue. It should also reflect on the success of the argument, the insights gained, and possible implications for further ethical reasoning. The concluding paragraph functions as a final reflection, demonstrating the student's comprehension and the strength of their moral stance.

The essay must be well-organized, moving logically from introduction through explanation, application, and conclusion. All sources—whether from course materials or external references—must be correctly cited with footnotes formatted according to Turabian style, and all references must be listed in a bibliography at the end of the paper. The entire document should adhere strictly to the formatting standards specified, ensuring readability and academic professionalism.

References

• Boyd, Richard. The Objective Standard: An Introduction to Moral Realism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
• Shafer-Landau, Russ. Moral Realism: A Defence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
• Stivers, Laura A., Christine E. Gudorf, and James B. Martin-Schramm. Christian Ethics: A Case Method Approach. 4th ed. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 2012.
• Rachels, James. The Elements of Moral Philosophy. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2014.
• Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
• Williams, Bernard. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Harvard University Press, 1985.
• Singer, Peter. Practical Ethics. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
• Hare, R. M. The Language of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962.
• Foot, Philippa. “Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives.” The Philosophical Review 74, no. 3 (1965): 305-316.
• Stead, William. Metaethics: An Introduction. London: Routledge, 2018.