Evaluate The Code Of Ethics To Determine If John Anderson Ha

Evaluate The Code Of Ethics to Determine If John Anderson Has Violated

In this scenario, you will evaluate the Code of Ethics to determine if John Anderson has violated International Widgets' Code of Ethics by engaging in business with a competitor. International Widgets Code of Ethics Confidentiality International Widgets is committed to maintaining the highest degree of integrity in all our dealings with potential, current, and past clients, both in terms of normal commercial confidentiality and the protection of all personal information received in the course of providing the business services concerned. We extend the same standards to all our customers, suppliers, and associates. Ethics We conduct business honestly and honorably and expect our clients and suppliers to do the same.

We train our employees to be ethical and expect them to always act in the best interests of International Widgets. Duty of Care Our actions and advice will always conform to relevant law and we believe that all businesses, including International Widgets, should avoid causing any adverse effect on the human rights of people in the organizations we deal with, the local and wider environments, and the well-being of society at large. Conflict of Interest Employees of International Widgets must act exclusively for the benefit of International Widgets. Employees should avoid providing services to a direct competitor of International Widgets, or engage in any type of business relationship that is not in the best interests of International Widgets.

Our contract will usually be in the form of a detailed proposal, including aims, activities, costs, timescales, and deliverables. The quality of our service and the value of our support provide the only true basis for continuity. We always try to meet our clients' contractual requirements, particularly for situations where an external funding provider requires more official parameters and controls. Intellectual Property and Moral Rights Quality Assurance We maintain the quality of what we do through constant ongoing review with our clients, of all aims, activities, outcomes, and the cost-effectiveness of every activity. We encourage regular review meetings and provide regular progress reports.

This consultancy has been accredited under a number of quality assurance schemes. Further details are available on request. Professional Conduct We conduct all of our activities professionally and with integrity. We take great care to be completely objective in our judgment and any recommendations that we give, so that issues are never influenced by anything other than the best and proper interests of our clients. Equality and Discrimination We always strive to be fair and objective in our advice and actions and we are never influenced in our decisions, actions, or recommendations by issues of gender, race, creed, color, age, or personal disability.

Paper For Above instruction

In the scenario involving John Anderson at International Widgets, the evaluation of the company's Code of Ethics reveals specific provisions that may be violated by his current conduct. The core principles of confidentiality, conflict of interest, and loyalty are especially relevant here. The code explicitly emphasizes integrity, honesty, and the employee's duty to act in the best interests of the company. Engaging with a competitor to share client information and receive financial incentives directly contravenes these principles.

Particularly, the section on conflict of interest states that employees must act exclusively for the benefit of International Widgets and avoid providing services to a competitor. John’s acceptance of a kickback from a competitor for customer information creates a clear conflict of interest, jeopardizing the company’s proprietary data and breaching confidentiality obligations. Moreover, the code’s emphasis on professional conduct and integrity further indicates that such behavior is unacceptable. His actions could compromise the company's reputation and create legal vulnerabilities, especially if proprietary or sensitive client data has been shared improperly.

Concerning legal avenues, International Widgets could pursue multiple strategies beyond ethics violations. Legally, this conduct could breach confidential information agreements or non-compete clauses if in place. If John provided proprietary customer information, this could constitute a breach of contractual confidentiality or even theft of trade secrets, subjecting him to civil litigation or damages. Additionally, the act of accepting kickbacks might violate laws related to anti-bribery, corruption, or commercial fraud, opening avenues for criminal prosecution against both John and the competitor.

Regarding fiduciary responsibilities, John is unlikely to be in a fiduciary relationship with International Widgets, as employment relationships do not automatically impose fiduciary duties unless specifically established in highly sensitive roles such as company officers or trusted advisors. Generally, employees are considered to owe a duty of loyalty and confidentiality, but this falls short of a fiduciary duty. As an employee and a salesperson, John acts as an agent of the company, tasked with representing its interests ethically and legally. His duties include acting in good faith, maintaining confidentiality, and avoiding conflicts of interest. His actions, in this case, appear to violate these responsibilities by diverting customer relationships and accepting financial benefits that compromise his loyalty to International Widgets.

Given the circumstances, Gloria, as HR assistant, should consider several actions. First, an immediate investigation into the extent of the misconduct is necessary, including reviewing any documented agreements and obtaining statements from John and relevant witnesses. If evidence confirms violations of the Code of Ethics and legal breaches, appropriate disciplinary measures should be applied, potentially including termination. Furthermore, the company should reinforce its policies and training regarding confidentiality, conflict of interest, and proper conduct. Whistleblower protections should also be communicated, encouraging employees to report unethical behavior without fear of retaliation.

In conclusion, John Anderson’s conduct appears to breach multiple provisions of International Widgets’ Code of Ethics, particularly concerning confidentiality, conflict of interest, and professional integrity. The company can pursue legal avenues based on contractual breaches and applicable laws. Additionally, John’s role does not constitute a fiduciary relationship but does impose obligations as an agent to act loyally and ethically. The recommended course of action involves thorough investigation, disciplinary procedures, and strengthening of ethical training to prevent future misconduct.

References

• Bateman, T. S., & Snell, S. A. (2019). Management: Leading & collaborating in a competitive world (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2021). Business ethics: Ethical decision making & cases (12th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Boatright, J. R. (2019). Ethics and the conduct of business (8th ed.). Pearson.
• Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2016). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
• Shell, G. R. (2020). Legal aspects of business (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Horner, J. (2018). Legal and ethical issues in business. Routledge.
• Robinson, P. H., & Fortino, J. (2017). Business law: Principles for a changing world. Cengage Learning.
• Heath, J. (2018). A primer on social ethics. Routledge.
• United States Department of Justice. (2021). Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. DOJ.gov.
• U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2022). Ethics in business conduct. SEC.gov.