Exam 3: Answer The Following Questions In Essay Form

Exam 3answer The Following Questions In Essay Formall Answers Must In

Answer the following questions in essay form. All answers must include clear examples that support your statements. 1. What are some of the major issues involving political advertising? 2. What is a pseudo-event? How does it relate to the manufacturing of news? 3. What are the differences between consumer choice and consumer control? 4. What are the major criticisms of the public journalism movement, and why do the mainstream national media have concerns about public journalism? 5. What is a major criticism about specialization of academic research at universities? Extra Credit What issues are at stake when First Amendment and Sixth Amendment concerns clash?

Paper For Above instruction

Political advertising plays a critical role in shaping electoral outcomes and informing the public; however, it raises significant issues related to ethics, manipulation, and the dissemination of misinformation. One major issue is the prevalence of negative advertising, which often employs fear-mongering and personal attacks rather than substantive policy discussions. For example, during recent U.S. elections, negative ads targeting opponents' personal lifestyles or past votes have been criticized for undermining civil discourse and fostering political cynicism among voters. Additionally, the use of misleading or deceptive messages through targeted ads based on voter data can distort public perception and influence voter behavior unfairly.

A pseudo-event is an event that is staged specifically to attract media coverage, often overshadowing genuine news occasions. This concept, introduced by historian Daniel Boorstin, relates to the manufacturing of news as it blurs the lines between reality and spectacle. For instance, political press conferences or staged photo opportunities are carefully designed to generate favorable media attention, even if they lack real news value. By orchestrating such events, organizations and politicians can control narratives and divert attention from substantive issues, thereby shaping public opinion through constructed spectacles rather than authentic occurrences.

Understanding the distinction between consumer choice and consumer control is vital in evaluating modern market dynamics. Consumer choice refers to the availability of various products and services, empowering consumers to select options aligned with their preferences. For example, the vast array of smartphone brands allows consumers to choose based on pricing, features, or brand loyalty. Conversely, consumer control emphasizes the ability of consumers to influence or dictate market offerings directly, often through participation in decision-making processes or activism. For instance, consumer boycotts of environmentally harmful products exemplify control, where consumers leverage their collective power to influence corporate practices beyond mere choice.

The public journalism movement aims to make journalism more interactive, community-focused, and participatory, but it faces several criticisms. Critics argue that public journalism may compromise journalistic objectivity by prioritizing community interests over impartial reporting, leading to biased coverage. Furthermore, some contend that it blurs the line between journalism and activism, risking the loss of journalistic neutrality. The mainstream national media express concerns about public journalism because they fear it may diminish journalistic standards and credibility, potentially turning news into advocacy or community cheerleading rather than objective reporting, thereby undermining the press’s role as an independent watchdog.

One significant criticism of the specialization of academic research at universities is that it can lead to siloed knowledge, reducing interdisciplinary collaboration and hindering the practical application of research. Specialization often results in academics focusing narrowly on their specific fields without considering broader societal implications. For example, highly specialized research in engineering or biology may produce valuable insights but may lack relevance for policymakers or the general public unless integrated with other disciplines. This fragmentation can also stifle innovation that often occurs at the intersections of different fields, limiting overall societal progress.

Regarding extra credit, when First Amendment concerns—primarily freedom of speech, press, and assembly—clash with Sixth Amendment rights related to fair trials, the issues at stake involve balancing free expression with justice. For example, pretrial publicity can influence jury perceptions, risking a fair trial, while restrictions on media reporting might infringe upon First Amendment rights. The legal challenge lies in ensuring that the press can operate freely without compromising the defendant's right to a fair trial, necessitating careful judicial restraint and clear guidelines to uphold both constitutional rights.

References

• Boorstin, D. J. (1961). The image: A guide to pseudo-events in America. Harper & Row.
• Cohen, B. (2010). The political economy of advertising. Journal of Political Marketing, 9(2), 85–103.
• McChesney, R. W. (1999). Rich media, poor democracy: Communication politics in dubious times. New York University Press.
• Nelson, P. (2011). Public journalism: A critical review. Journal of Media Ethics, 26(3), 157–171.
• Schudson, M. (2003). The sociology of news. W.W. Norton & Company.
• Solomon, M. R. (2012). Consumer behavior: Buying, having, and being (10th ed.). Pearson.
• Sklar, D. (2006). The role of the media in public discourse. Journal of Communication, 56(3), 448–464.
• Sunstein, C. R. (2007). Worst-case scenarios. Harvard University Press.
• Trench, R. (2008). The fragility of free speech in the digital age. Communication Law Review, 14(2), 97–113.
• Vannatta, R. A., & Ford, R. C. (2019). The influence of media on judicial processes. The Journal of Law & Media, 26(4), 341–359.