Examine This Survey Result And Determine The Descript 114529 ✓ Solved

Examine This Survey Result And Determine The Descriptive Statistic Tha

Examine this survey result and determine the descriptive statistic that is reported, and indicate what it means. What is your gender? 5. What is your gender? Male 7.5% Female 92.3%

How does a nurse know what (if any) knowledge in a research study is usable for clinical practice? What would a critical thinker look for in the evidence before deciding to change? What influence do credibility and clinical significance have on your decisions to integrate research-based evidence into your practice?

As a nurse, what is the importance of being a change agent?

Remember to review the syllabus expectations for initial discussion posts and peer replies! Discuss the following:

1. How has blockchain been successfully applied in industry and government?
2. What barriers exist in the adoption of blockchain technology.

You are required to cite this week’s assigned readings in your paper. You may also cite prior week's reading assignments and external sources if you wish. Use the following headings to organize your paper: Introduction, Question 1, Question 2, Conclusion, References. Submit your paper as a Word attachment in the discussion forum. I provide feedback within the paper and will not grade your post unless you submit it as an attachment.

Your response to the discussion prompt should contain a minimum of 500 words and it should be submitted no later than Wednesday before 11:59 pm EST. Your response should be formatted in APA style and reference each of this week's readings. Also, two peer replies should contain a minimum of 150 words each and should be submitted no later than Sunday before 11:59 pm EST. The initial post is worth 20 points and the peer replies are worth 2 points each (4 points).

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The integration of statistical analysis and research evidence into clinical practice is vital for improving patient outcomes and ensuring that nursing actions are evidence-based. This paper explores the descriptive statistics reported in survey results, specifically focusing on gender demographics, and examines key issues related to research utilization, critical thinking, and the role of nurses as change agents. Additionally, the discussion extends to the application of blockchain technology in industry and government, as well as the barriers hindering its broader adoption. These topics are contextualized within current academic literature to provide a comprehensive understanding of their relevance to contemporary nursing and technology practices.

Question 1: What is the Reported Descriptive Statistic and Its Significance?

The survey data provided indicates that the gender composition of respondents is described using a percentage distribution, with 7.5% male and 92.3% female. This figure exemplifies a descriptive statistic known as the "relative frequency" or "percentage," which summarizes categorical data efficiently. This statistic offers a clear snapshot of the demographic makeup of survey respondents, allowing for easier interpretation of the population characteristics involved.

Descriptive statistics such as percentages are crucial in research because they distill complex data into understandable figures, facilitating insights into sample compositions or trends within data sets. In this context, the reported statistic reveals a predominantly female respondent base, which can influence the interpretation of survey responses in relation to gender-specific perspectives or experiences.

Understanding what this statistic signifies involves recognizing that it does not infer causality or establish relationships but simply describes the data's distribution. It helps researchers and practitioners grasp the demographic context of the response pool, which is essential for generalizing findings or tailoring interventions. For example, if most respondents are female, it might influence how data analysis and subsequent practice guidelines are developed.

Furthermore, the use of percentages in reporting gender demographics aligns with best practices in descriptive statistics, enabling comparability across different studies and populations. The high percentage of females (92.3%) could also suggest sampling biases or demographic trends pertinent to the survey's target population, which warrants transparent reporting and cautious interpretation.

Question 2: Bulleted Discussion on Research in Clinical Practice and Blockchain Application

Research utilization in nursing practice hinges upon critical appraisal of evidence. Nurses assess the usability of research findings through several criteria, including validity, reliability, relevance, and clinical significance. Critical thinkers scrutinize the methodology and results sections of studies to determine if the evidence is sound and applicable. For instance, they evaluate study design—favoring randomized controlled trials for causality—and consider the statistical significance and effect sizes to gauge clinical relevance.

Credibility and clinical significance are fundamental in deciding whether to incorporate research findings into practice. Credibility relates to the trustworthiness of the source, authorship, and the peer-reviewed status of the research. Clinical significance pertains to whether the evidence has a meaningful impact on patient care or outcomes. A study with statistically significant results but negligible clinical impact may not warrant practice change.

Nurses as change agents play a vital role in advancing healthcare by advocating for evidence-based interventions. They lead efforts to implement new protocols, educate colleagues, and evaluate outcomes. As change agents, nurses facilitate the translation of research into practice, which is essential for improving safety, quality, and efficiency in healthcare systems.

Expanding to blockchain technology, its successful applications in industry include supply chain management, where it enhances transparency and traceability (Morkunas et al., 2019). In government, blockchain has been utilized for secure voting systems, identity verification, and regulatory compliance (Bussgang, Berk, & Schwalb, 2019). For example, Walmart leverages blockchain to track food safety, ensuring rapid responses to contamination.

However, extensive barriers impede wider blockchain adoption, such as technical complexity, scalability issues, high energy consumption, and regulatory uncertainty. Additionally, resistance to change within organizations and insufficient understanding of blockchain's potential benefits hinder implementation (Morkunas et al., 2019). Privacy concerns and lack of standardization also complicate integration into existing systems.

In healthcare, blockchain's potential for secure health records sharing is promising but remains limited by existing barriers. Addressing these challenges requires cross-sector collaboration, regulatory frameworks, and technological innovations that enhance scalability and privacy (Bussgang et al., 2019).

Conclusion

In conclusion, descriptive statistics like percentages are fundamental tools for summarizing demographic data, fostering understanding of research study populations. Critical appraisal and application of research findings require attention to credibility and clinical relevance, essential traits for nurses acting as change agents. The successful integration of blockchain across industry and government illustrates its transformative potential but also highlights significant barriers such as complexity, scalability, and regulatory issues. Overcoming these obstacles is crucial for leveraging blockchain’s benefits across sectors, including healthcare. Future research and technological development, coupled with strategic policy-making, will continue to shape the role of blockchain in advancing industry standards and practices.

References

• Morkunas, V. J., Paschen, J., & Boon, E. (2019). How Blockchain technologies impact your business model. Business Horizons, 62, 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.01.001
• Bussgang, J. J., Berk, E. B., & Schwalb, N. (2019, January 15). AirFox (A): Embracing the Blockchain and an ICO. Harvard Business School. https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=58319
• Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2016). Blockchain revolution: How the technology behind bitcoin is changing money, business, and the world. Penguin.
• Crosby, M., Pattanayak, P., Verma, S., & Kalyanaraman, V. (2016). Blockchain technology: Beyond bitcoin. Applied Innovation Review, 2, 6-10.
• Saberi, S., et al. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2117-2135.
• Reyna, A., et al. (2018). On blockchain and its integrations with AI and IoT. Future Generation Computer Systems, 88, 173-190.
• Lacity, M., & Van Valer, S. (2019). Blockchain technology adoption: Characteristics and barriers. MIS Quarterly Executive, 18(2), 85-99.
• Wüst, K., & Gervais, A. (2018). Do you need a blockchain? Proceedings of Crypto Valley Conference on Blockchain Technology, 243-256.
• Zheng, Z., et al. (2018). An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(4), 2736-2761.
• Yli-Huumo, J., et al. (2016). Where is current research on blockchain technology? International Journal of Information Management, 36(5), 541-554.