Example In Res 860: An Annotated Bibliography Was Completed

Examplein Res860 An Annotated Bibliography Was Completed An Annotated

EXAMPLE In RES860 an annotated bibliography was completed. An annotated bibliography is a list of sources that have been found about a research project that includes a brief overview of the source with a written analysis and the source attached to the list. (Annotated Bibliography, 2022) This is a great resource for us as we continue developing our research trio and research prospectus.

What are you most excited about as you expand your annotated bibliography? I am most excited about being able to organize my sources. It will also help me see what sources are useful for my research and what ones do not need to be included in my lit review.

I am also excited because it will help locate other researchers who may have an interest in the same topic, and I might be able to connect with them. This would be huge to the overall research field.

What have you learned about your topic(s) and subtopic(s) related to your proposed research topic? Through working on my annotated bibliography, I have learned that there is a lot of information on patient registration errors specific to departments and surgical teams, but not front desk teams. I have also learned that many have noted registration errors to be a huge cause for concern of patient safety.

That first entrance of information, if wrong, can lead to many errors in care, medication, treatment, surgery, or aftercare. These errors can then lead to sentinel events for patients. Sentinel events are events that cause the patient, facility, caregivers, and families catastrophic results or life-altering results that either lead to death or a reduced quality of life. (Sanderson, 2019)

How close do you feel you are to mastering the topics and subtopics related to your proposed research topic? While no one ever really masters anything these days as learning is always occurring and innovative ideas and inventions come to be, I do feel that I am a master of my research topic. Not only through research, but through my career and events and experiences in my personal life that have resulted from this very topic.

I do know that as I continue to research, I continue to find new reasons for the errors and new ways of preventing the errors. Not necessarily new information to me but put into a practical way that helps me define my research and my suggestions on fixing the problem.

What will you do to close the gap between where you are now and full mastery? Give dates or time frames when you will take this action? To close the gap between where I am now and full mastery, I will continue to research my topic. Daily I will continue to find new articles that help show the gap in my topic and the need for further research. I will weekly look to add no less than one new annotated bibliography to my list. Within these next two months, I will look to add ten additional resources. By the one year left a mark before graduation, August 2022, I will look to have an annotated bibliography of no less than 50 resources. This is a great starting point as it will show lots of research went into it and fifty solid resources specific to my study will be the result.

By August of 2022 I plan to have chapters 1 and 2 fully written of my dissertation in a rough draft, yet most complete form. I will also have my permissions from participants and facilities complete and my questions for my survey/discussion board complete before August of 2022 so I can present them to the facilities for review before using them to avoid any issues with HIPAA. My goal by August 2022 is to have complete proficiency in my topic so that I can begin my observation research and participant research to further analyze my problem statement and show what is needed to help avoid those patient registration errors.

Paper For Above instruction

The development of a comprehensive annotated bibliography is a vital component in academic research, particularly in fields dealing with healthcare safety and quality improvement. In the context of patient registration errors, an annotated bibliography consolidates pertinent sources, offering a summarized insight and critical analysis to support further research and practical interventions. This essay explores the significance of constructing a robust annotated bibliography, insights gained about the topic of registration errors, and strategic plans for mastering the subject to contribute effectively to healthcare safety initiatives.

Understanding the importance of an annotated bibliography begins with recognizing its role in organizing sources systematically. It facilitates researchers in identifying relevant literature, understanding current trends, and pinpointing research gaps. In healthcare research, where patient safety is paramount, an annotated bibliography enables the researcher to critically evaluate sources and prioritize the most credible and impactful studies. For example, in the context of patient registration errors, the annotated bibliography can highlight the extent of registration inaccuracies, their causes, and potential solutions, providing a foundation for targeted interventions (Fitzgerald et al., 2018).

Insights garnered from constructing such a bibliography reveal specific areas needing focus. For instance, previous research indicates that registration errors are predominantly caused by workflow inefficiencies, inadequate staff training, and outdated technology (Johnson & Lee, 2019). Interestingly, while a considerable body of literature addresses errors within departmental and surgical teams, there is a notable gap in studies focused on front desk team contributions and the impact of their errors on patient safety. Recognizing this gap suggests that future research should explore these areas more thoroughly to develop comprehensive safety protocols (Sanderson, 2019).

Moreover, a critical lesson from the research process is the potential impact of registration errors on patient safety outcomes. Errors during initial patient data entry can cascade into medication errors, incorrect treatment plans, and even sentinel events—serious, preventable adverse events leading to death or severe harm (WHO, 2020). Sentinel events underscore the importance of effective communication, proper staff training, and technological solutions such as electronic health records (EHRs) with error-detection capabilities. Therefore, the literature consistently points toward multifaceted interventions to mitigate such registration errors (Higgins et al., 2021).

Mastery of this research domain extends beyond mere collection of sources. It encompasses understanding the root causes of registration errors, their effects on patient safety, and effective strategies for prevention. Reflecting on personal and professional experiences reinforces confidence that significant progress has been made in understanding this topic. However, ongoing research continues to uncover new facets and propose refined solutions, highlighting that mastery is a continuous process (Brown & Patel, 2017). To bridge remaining gaps, a strategic plan involves meticulous ongoing research, expanding the annotated bibliography, and engaging with current technological advancements and policy changes.

Planning timelines are integral to achieving mastery. For example, aiming to develop initial chapters of a dissertation by a set date, such as August 2022, ensures the research stays on schedule. Accumulating at least fifty credible sources within that timeframe supports comprehensive analysis and strengthens the research foundation. Moreover, obtaining necessary permissions and IRB approvals ensures ethical compliance, which is critical in healthcare research (American Medical Association [AMA], 2019).

Practical steps to reach full proficiency include daily article searches, weekly annotated entries, and targeted dissertation writing milestones. For instance, by August 2022, completing initial dissertation chapters and securing participant permissions are priorities to facilitate effective data collection. These collected insights can then be utilized to develop interventions aiming to reduce registration errors, ultimately enhancing patient safety and care quality.

In conclusion, building a thorough annotated bibliography and establishing strategic research milestones are essential in advancing knowledge in healthcare safety related to patient registration errors. By systematically expanding the literature review, understanding the root causes, and applying technological and procedural solutions, healthcare providers can significantly mitigate risks and improve patient outcomes. This ongoing process exemplifies the importance of continual learning and adaptation in the pursuit of healthcare excellence.

References

• American Medical Association. (2019). Ethical guidelines for research in healthcare. JAMA, 322(15), 1452–1458.
• Brown, L. & Patel, R. (2017). Continuing education in healthcare safety: A pathway to mastery. Journal of Healthcare Quality, 39(4), 211–217.
• Fitzgerald, A., Murphy, S., & Williams, D. (2018). Addressing registration errors in hospitals: Strategies and outcomes. Healthcare Management Review, 43(2), 138–145.
• Higgins, M., Torres, L., & Singh, S. (2021). Technological interventions in reducing patient registration errors. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 147, 104377.
• Johnson, P. & Lee, C. (2019). Workflow inefficiencies and registration errors in healthcare settings. Journal of Hospital Administration, 36(3), 45–53.
• Sanderson, P. (2019). Sentinel events and patient safety: A review. Patient Safety Journal, 5(1), 23–29.
• World Health Organization. (2020). Sentinel event alerts and patient safety. Geneva: WHO.