Exhibit 22: The Distribution Of Employment And Payroll

Sheet1exhibit 22 The Distribution Of Employment And Payroll Expenditu

The primary focus of this assignment is to analyze the use of quality improvement (QI) methodologies, particularly the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle, in advancing healthcare outcomes for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), especially in addressing comorbidities like anxiety and depression. This analysis involves evaluating a proposed change strategy—providing cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) to COPD patients through mental health professionals or trained nursing staff—and assessing how the PDCA cycle can facilitate the implementation and evaluation of this strategy. Furthermore, it explores the benefits and limitations of applying the PDCA cycle within healthcare settings, emphasizing interprofessional collaboration and continuous quality improvement aimed at enhancing patient recovery, self-management, and overall well-being.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) remains a significant global health challenge, characterized by progressive airflow limitation and associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Despite advances in pharmacologic treatments and pulmonary management, patients often experience comorbid mental health conditions, notably anxiety and depression, which complicate disease management and impair quality of life (Pooler & Beech, 2014). Recognizing the interconnectedness of physical and psychological health, healthcare providers are increasingly adopting integrated approaches to improve outcomes. Implementing quality improvement (QI) methodologies such as the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle can systematically guide organizations in translating innovative strategies—like providing cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)—into sustainable clinical practice enhancements.

The Role of Quality Improvement in Healthcare

Quality improvement in healthcare revolves around the continuous effort to optimize patient outcomes, safety, and satisfaction through systematic processes. It involves identifying areas for improvement, developing targeted interventions, and evaluating their effectiveness (Carvalho, Jun, & Mitchell, 2017). QI methodologies, notably the PDCA cycle, provide structured frameworks that facilitate iterative testing and refinement of clinical strategies, fostering a culture of ongoing learning and adaptation (Pietrzak & Paliszkiewicz, 2015). Effective QI integration ensures that best practices are maintained, and healthcare delivery becomes more responsive to patient needs.

Application of the PDCA Cycle to COPD and Mental Health Integration

The PDCA cycle comprises four stages: Plan, Do, Check, and Act. In the context of COPD management and mental health integration, the cycle begins with the 'Plan' phase—identifying the gap that COPD patients are frequently underdiagnosed or undertreated for anxiety and depression, which creates barriers to optimal recovery. The intervention involves offering CBT, either through mental health specialists or by training nursing staff in CBT techniques. The 'Do' phase entails implementing this intervention on a small scale—such as initiating a pilot program in a specific unit or with a select group of patients—and documenting the processes and immediate outcomes (Donnelly & Kirk, 2015).

The 'Check' phase involves evaluating whether provision of CBT leads to measurable improvements in patients' psychological well-being, adherence to COPD treatment, and overall quality of life. Data collection tools could include standardized mental health assessments, patient self-reports, and clinical indicators. If the intervention demonstrates positive outcomes, the 'Act' phase promotes standardization across the organization, integrating the practice into routine care. Conversely, if results are suboptimal, the process is reevaluated, and modifications—such as adjusting the training or intervention delivery—are made for subsequent cycles.

Advantages of Using the PDCA Cycle for Healthcare Improvement

The PDCA cycle's iterative nature promotes adaptability, allowing healthcare teams to refine interventions based on real-time feedback. It fosters collaborative engagement among multidisciplinary teams—physicians, nurses, mental health professionals—enhancing interprofessional communication and shared ownership of patient outcomes (Amalakuhan & Adams, 2015). The structured approach facilitates transparency and accountability, as each cycle's results are documented, enabling evidence-based decision-making. Furthermore, its emphasis on small-scale testing reduces risks associated with large-scale changes, ensuring that modifications are both practical and sustainable (Pietrzak & Paliszkiewicz, 2015).

Applying the PDCA cycle also underpins continuous learning—key in complex healthcare environments—encouraging staff to develop problem-solving skills and adapt interventions tailored to specific clinical settings. When effectively implemented, this methodology can lead to improved patient engagement, higher satisfaction levels, and better health outcomes, particularly in managing multifaceted conditions like COPD with psychological comorbidities (Howard & Dupont, 2014).

Limitations and Challenges of the PDCA Cycle

Despite its strengths, the PDCA cycle has notable limitations. The process can be slow and resource-intensive, often requiring repeated cycles before achieving desired results, which may be impractical in urgent clinical situations (Reed & Card, 2015). The linear structure may oversimplify complex healthcare processes, potentially overlooking systemic barriers such as organizational resistance, staffing shortages, or data collection challenges. Additionally, misinterpretation of data during the 'Check' phase can lead to erroneous conclusions, impeding progress (Coury et al., 2017).

Implementing the PDCA cycle also necessitates a culture receptive to continuous change and open communication, which may be difficult in traditionally hierarchical healthcare organizations. Moreover, the cycle's effectiveness depends on accurate measurement tools, adequate training, and leadership support—elements that are not always guaranteed (Kliem, 2015). In crisis or emergency scenarios, the method's iterative nature may delay urgent decision-making, emphasizing the need for complementary rapid-response strategies.

Knowledge Gaps and Opportunities for Improvement

Several knowledge gaps could impact the successful application of the PDCA cycle in healthcare. For instance, improper data interpretation can lead to flawed interventions. Clinicians often encounter difficulties in accurately measuring outcomes using electronic health records or standardized assessment tools (Coury et al., 2017). This challenge underscores the importance of robust data management systems and staff training. Furthermore, the variability in patient populations and healthcare settings necessitates customized approaches rather than one-size-fits-all solutions. Recognizing these nuances presents opportunities for further research into tailored QI strategies that account for contextual factors (Pietrzak & Paliszkiewicz, 2015).

Additionally, integrating patient feedback into each cycle can enhance the relevance and acceptability of interventions, promoting stakeholder engagement and sustained improvement.

Conclusion

The integration of cognitive behavioral therapy for COPD patients through a structured quality improvement approach exemplifies how the PDCA cycle can facilitate meaningful and sustainable healthcare enhancements. By embracing the cyclical nature of planning, implementation, evaluation, and refinement, healthcare organizations can adapt evidence-based strategies to complex patient needs. Although challenges such as slow progression and data management issues exist, the benefits of continuous improvement—especially in interprofessional collaboration and patient-centered care—make the PDCA cycle a valuable tool within healthcare systems. Moving forward, addressing knowledge gaps and fostering organizational cultures open to change will be essential for maximizing the potential of QI methodologies like the PDCA cycle in improving health outcomes for multifaceted conditions like COPD combined with mental health comorbidities.

References

• Amalakuhan, B., & Adams, S. G. (2015). Improving outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: The role of the interprofessional approach. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 10(1), 1225–1232.
• Carvalho, F., Jun, G. T., & Mitchell, V. (2017). Participatory design for behaviour change: An integrative approach to healthcare quality improvement. Paper presented at IASDR 2017 Proceedings, 7th International Congress of the International Association of Societies of Design Research, Cincinnati, OH.
• Coury, J., Schneider, J. L., Rivelli, J. S., Petrik, A. F., Seibel, E., D’Agostini, B., . . . Coronado, G. D. (2017). Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach to a large pragmatic study involving safety net clinics. BMC Health Services Research, 17(411).
• Donnelly, P., & Kirk, P. (2015). Use the PDSA model for effective change management. Education for Primary Care, 26(4), 279–281.
• Heslop, K., Newton, J., Baker, C., Burns, G., Carrick-Sen, D., & De Soyza, A. (2013). Effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) interventions for anxiety in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) undertaken by respiratory nurses: The COPD CBT CARE study. BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 13(1).
• Howard, C., & Dupont, S. (2014). ‘The COPD breathlessness manual’: A randomised controlled trial to test a cognitive-behavioural manual versus information booklets on health service use, mood and health status, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, 24.
• Kliem, R. L. (2015). Managing Lean Projects. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
• Pietrzak, M., & Paliszkiewicz, J. (2015). Framework of strategic learning: The PDCA cycle. Management, 10(2), 149–161.
• Pooler, A., & Beech, R. (2014). Examining the relationship between anxiety and depression and exacerbations of COPD which result in hospital admission: A systematic review. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 9(1), 315–330.