Explain How An Understanding Of Moral Intensity, Ethical Sen

Explain how an understanding of moral intensity, ethical sensitivity, and situational influence can support ethical behavior individually and among people

Understanding moral intensity, ethical sensitivity, and situational influence plays a crucial role in fostering ethical behavior both at the individual level and within organizations. According to McShane and Von Glinow (2013), moral intensity refers to the degree to which a situation demands ethical judgment, influenced by factors such as the magnitude of consequences, social consensus, and probability of effect. Ethical sensitivity involves the awareness of the ethical implications of a decision, enabling individuals to recognize ethical issues that may otherwise be overlooked. Situational influence pertains to the external factors, such as organizational culture and peer behavior, that shape an individual's ethical decision-making process.

When individuals comprehend the concept of moral intensity, they become more vigilant about the ethical dimensions of their actions, especially in situations with significant consequences or social consensus. Ethical sensitivity enhances this awareness by enabling individuals to detect ethical dilemmas early, thereby promoting proactive ethical considerations. For instance, a manager aware of moral intensity may recognize the importance of transparency in financial reporting, preventing fraudulent activities. Situational influences, such as a corporate culture that rewards ethical behavior, further reinforce individuals' commitment to ethical standards by creating an environment where ethical conduct is the norm.

In an organizational setting, these components support ethical behavior collectively. For example, in a healthcare organization, staff with high ethical sensitivity and an understanding of moral intensity are more likely to identify and address ethical issues concerning patient confidentiality. When the organizational culture emphasizes ethical practices, situational influences reinforce individual ethical behaviors, creating a cohesive environment of integrity. Conversely, neglecting these aspects may lead to ethical lapses, misconduct, and erosion of trust.

Consider a scenario where an employee notices that a supervisor is manipulating sales figures to meet targets. The moral intensity of this situation is high because the consequences include potential legal penalties and damage to the company's reputation. Ethical sensitivity helps the employee recognize this as an ethical issue. If the organizational culture promotes transparency and accountability, the situational influence encourages the employee to report the misconduct without fear of retaliation. Thus, understanding these components collectively fosters a culture of ethics, where individuals are equipped and motivated to act ethically even in challenging situations.

In conclusion, moral intensity, ethical sensitivity, and situational influence interact to shape individuals’ ethical judgments and behaviors. By developing awareness of these elements, organizations can cultivate an environment that promotes ethical conduct, reduces unethical practices, and maintains organizational integrity. This integrated approach ensures that ethical behavior becomes a shared value, supported by individual insight and organizational support.

Paper For Above instruction

Understanding the intricate relationship between moral intensity, ethical sensitivity, and situational influence is essential for fostering ethical behavior within individuals and organizations. These concepts serve as foundational elements that guide ethical decision-making, influence organizational culture, and shape the behavior of employees at all levels.

Moral intensity, as defined by scholars like Jones (1991), refers to the degree of concern an individual has regarding the ethical implications of a decision. It is influenced by factors such as the magnitude of consequences, social consensus, probability of effect, temporal immediacy, proximity, and concentration of effect. When moral intensity is high, individuals are more likely to recognize ethical issues and feel compelled to act ethically. For example, the decision to report financial fraud is often characterized by high moral intensity due to its potential legal and reputational consequences.

Ethical sensitivity complements this by enhancing an individual’s ability to perceive ethical issues. It involves a heightened awareness and understanding of how decisions impact others and the ethical principles involved. Ethical sensitivity can be shaped by individual traits, experiences, and training. For instance, a manager trained in ethical awareness might be more attuned to subtle signs of misconduct or unethical behavior, even when the signals are not overt.

Situational influence pertains to external factors such as organizational culture, peer behavior, authority dynamics, and societal norms. These factors significantly influence ethical behavior because they set the context within which decisions are made. A workplace with a strong ethical culture, clear policies, and ethical leadership encourages employees to act ethically, reinforcing individual tendencies to do the right thing.

The synergy of these concepts is evident in real-world applications. For instance, in finance, a professional with high moral intensity and ethical sensitivity, working within an organization that emphasizes integrity, is more likely to resist unethical pressures such as manipulating earnings reports. This collective understanding creates an environment where ethical conduct is valued and upheld.

Furthermore, situational influences can either facilitate or hinder ethical behavior. In environments where unethical practices are rewarded or overlooked, individuals may experience a conflict between their moral judgment and the organizational norms, leading to ethical lapses. Conversely, organizations that promote transparency, accountability, and ethical standards create a supportive environment that encourages individuals to uphold integrity, even under pressure.

A practical scenario illustrating these components involves an employee who notices that the company is dumping waste illegally. The high moral intensity of the situation—due to legal risks and environmental harm—raises ethical sensitivity, prompting the employee to recognize the issue. If the company’s culture supports whistleblowing and has policies protecting employees from retaliation, the situational influenceBolsters the employee’s decision to report the misconduct. This demonstrates how awareness and context work together to support ethical behavior.

Ultimately, fostering ethical behavior in organizations requires a comprehensive understanding of these elements. Training programs that enhance moral sensitivity, decision-making frameworks highlighting moral intensity, and cultivating a culture of ethics are all crucial. Such approaches ensure that individuals are not only aware of ethical issues but are also motivated and supported to act rightly, thereby promoting integrity and trust within the organization.

References

• Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-Contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366-395.
• McShane, S. L., & Von Glinow, M. A. (2013). Organizational Behavior. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Treviño, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2017). Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk About How to Do It Right. Wiley.
• Kidder, R. M. (2005). How Good People Make Tough Choices. HarperOne.
• Kaptein, M. (2011). Understanding unethical behavior: A strategic perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(2), 251-267.
• Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. Praeger.
• Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2019). Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making & Cases. Cengage Learning.
• Schwartz, M. S. (2017). Managing ethical behavior. Business Horizons, 60(6), 801-809.
• Hoffman, W. M., & Moore, M. R. (2018). Business ethics: Readings and cases in corporate morality. Cengage Learning.
• Scherer, R. C., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 173-210.