Explain How You Reached The Answer Or Show Your Work 207748

Explain how you reached the answer or show your work if a mathematical calculation is needed, or both

Suppose you decide (as did Steve Jobs and Mark Zuckerberg) to start a company. Your product is a software platform that integrates a wide range of media devices, including laptop computers, desktop computers, digital video recorders, and cell phones. Your initial client base is the student body at your university.

Once you have established your company and set up procedures for operating it, you plan to expand to other colleges in the area and eventually to go nationwide. At some point, hopefully sooner rather than later, you plan to go public with an IPO and then to buy a yacht and take off for the South Pacific to indulge in your passion for underwater photography. With these plans in mind, you need to answer for yourself, and potential investors, the following questions:

1. What is an agency relationship? When you first begin operations, assuming you are the only employee and only your money is invested in the business, would any agency conflicts exist? Explain your answer.

2. Suppose your company raises funds from outside lenders. What type of agency costs might occur? How might lenders mitigate the agency costs?

3. What is corporate governance? List five corporate governance provisions that are internal to a firm and are under its control.

4. Briefly describe the use of stock options in a compensation plan. What are some potential problems with stock options as a form of compensation?

5. Briefly explain how regulatory agencies and legal systems affect corporate governance.

Paper For Above instruction

The concept of agency relationships is fundamental to understanding corporate structure and governance. An agency relationship exists when one party, the principal, delegates decision-making authority to another party, the agent, to perform specific tasks on their behalf. In the context of a new startup owned solely by an individual, the initial agency relationship is limited or nonexistent because the owner is both the principal and the agent. There are no conflicts because decision-making is centralized, and the owner’s interests are aligned with the company’s operations.

However, as the company expands and seeks external funding, agency conflicts can emerge between owners (principals) and managers or lenders (agents). When external investors or lenders provide capital, they become principals who expect that managers, acting as agents, will run the company in their best interests. Conflicts may arise if managers pursue personal gains at the expense of shareholders, such as through excessive executive compensation, empire-building, or other actions that might not maximize shareholder value. Lenders, when providing debt financing, face agency costs if managers undertake risky projects that jeopardize debt repayment, or if they divert funds to non-productive activities. To mitigate these costs, lenders often impose covenants, conduct regular audits, and require collateral, ensuring that managers align their actions with the interests of debt holders.

Corporate governance refers to the systems, principles, and processes by which companies are directed and controlled. Effective corporate governance ensures accountability, transparency, and fairness, fostering the long-term success of the organization. Internally, firms can implement several provisions to bolster governance, including independent board oversight, clear delineation of management and board roles, internal audit functions, codes of conduct, and shareholder rights protections. These mechanisms promote ethical behavior, informed decision-making, and limit managerial discretion that might harm shareholders’ interests.

Stock options are a prevalent component of executive compensation schemes, serving as incentives for managers to increase company value. Stock options give executives the right to purchase company shares at a predetermined price, usually lower than market value, thus aligning their interests with shareholders. When the company performs well, the value of stock options increases, encouraging executives to work towards increased profitability and stock price appreciation. Nonetheless, stock options have notable drawbacks. They can lead to excessive risk-taking since managers might pursue high-reward projects that can jeopardize company stability. Additionally, stock options may encourage short-termism, where managers focus on boosting stock prices temporarily rather than fostering sustainable growth, and they can cause distortions in financial statements, obscuring true company performance.

Regulatory agencies and legal systems significantly influence corporate governance by establishing the legal framework and rules within which firms operate. Agencies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) enforce disclosure requirements, ensuring transparency and protecting investors against fraud and manipulation. Legal systems provide enforceable contracts and protect shareholder rights, enabling shareholders to hold management accountable. Laws like the Sarbanes-Oxley Act impose strict internal controls and reporting standards, reducing corporate misconduct. These regulations serve to minimize informational asymmetries and enforce accountability, thereby strengthening overall corporate governance and market confidence.

References

Brickley, J. A., Smith, C. W., & Zimmerman, J. L. (2019). Managerial Economics and Organizational Architecture. McGraw-Hill Education.

Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.

Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.

Solomon, J. (2017). Corporate Governance and Accountability. Wiley.

Filatotchev, I., & Wright, M. (2011). Agency theory, corporate governance and the role of boards. Journal of Management & Governance, 15(3), 265-280.

OECD. (2015). G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Heath, J., & Norman, R. (2004). Stakeholder theory, corporate governance, and public purpose. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(2-3), 103-112.

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2020). Basics of the SEC's Role in Corporate Governance. SEC.

Coles, J. L., Daniel, N. D., & Naveen, L. (2008). Board control and CEO appointment certainty. The Journal of Finance, 63(2), 785-815.