Explanations Of Crime And Criminal Behavior ✓ Solved

Explanations of Crime and Criminal Behavior Crime brings together

Explanations of Crime and Criminal Behavior Crime brings together honest men and concentrates them. - Émile Durkheim. The arguments as to why a person becomes a criminal are similar to why some become leaders, raising the question of whether leadership is based on nature or nurture. Those who believe it is nurture argue that leaders are made, while those who argue it is nature believe that leaders are born. This same debate is prevalent among criminologists regarding criminal behavior.

No one knows for sure why certain individuals seem more prone to commit crimes, but several theories attempt to explain this phenomenon. Scholarly debate about these theories helps spark further study, which explains the vast number of theories in criminology. Theories serve as the foundation for a better understanding of the characteristics that lead individuals to a life of crime. A theory represents an educated guess based on facts and observations, not a concrete fact.

Typically, scholarly readings indicate that theories span both nature and nurture perspectives, often contradicting each other. Life-course theory, for example, emphasizes the interplay between nature and nurture in criminal behavior. Similarly, evolutionary neuroandrogenic (ENA) theory is primarily rooted in nature while acknowledging the supportive role of nurture.

Life-course theory examines the relationship between time and behavior, asserting that age, relationships, changes, and societal influences throughout an individual's lifetime impact behavior. This theory encompasses biological, psychological, and spiritual aspects of human beings in relation to their environment. Life-course theory emerged from the analysis of multiple longitudinal studies that observed how life events influenced family dynamics, education, and employment.

The life-course theory posits that time acts as a significant factor influencing whether individuals overcome tragedies or succumb to criminal behavior. For instance, individuals who experience adverse life events, such as school shootings, may have their family life disrupted, impacting their education and employability. Over time, responses to these events shape their life choices leading to potential pathways toward crime.

The theory identifies several nature-based factors categorized into five concepts: cohorts, transitions, trajectories, life events, and turning points. Cohorts refer to one's support groups, including family and peers. Transitions denote changes in social roles, while trajectories describe the long-term patterns of stability and change influenced by these transitions. Life events are impactful occurrences that interrupt one's life flow, and turning points signify moments of significant change, whether positive or negative.

The nature-based factors influence an individual's capacity to respond to life challenges, with those facing major risks like poverty more prone to engage in criminal behavior compared to those with fewer risks. Additionally, having a supportive cohort can enhance resilience against life's adversities.

In contrast, ENA theory straddles the line between nature and nurture. It suggests that criminal behavior is learned through exposure and modeling while asserting that the desire to commit criminal acts has biological and instinctual roots. ENA theorists argue that rehabilitation can effectively alter criminal behavior; however, some offenders, such as serial criminals, may resist rehabilitation efforts due to innate biological factors.

Furthermore, ENA theory posits that evolutionary pressures influence criminal behavior. Males, driven by competition to portray strength and provision, may resort to criminal acts to secure status or resources. For females, the observed criminal behaviors may lead them to commit similar acts as a means to attract potential partners.

Preventative measures suggested by ENA theorists focus on modifying biological and neurological aspects contributing to criminal behavior through therapeutic interventions. Nonetheless, ENA also advocates for substantial sentences for serious offenders to prevent their contributions to society's gene pool.

In conclusion, the question of why certain individuals are more likely to commit crimes remains unanswered, perpetuating the debate between nature and nurture. Several theories, including biologically, psychologically, and culturally driven arguments, provide insight into criminal behavior. Ultimately, current thinking supports a blend of both nature and nurture as influential determinants of criminality. Understanding these theories is crucial for those in law enforcement or related fields, as they may encounter these concepts within defense strategies or when assessing potential criminal behavior.

Paper For Above Instructions

Crime is a complex phenomenon that has intrigued scholars, criminologists, and law enforcement professionals for centuries. The understanding of crime and criminal behavior has evolved, leading to the formulation of various theories aimed at explaining why individuals engage in such behavior. Two predominant frameworks for understanding criminal behavior are the life-course theory and the evolutionary neuroandrogenic (ENA) theory. These frameworks address the ongoing debate of nature versus nurture, providing insights into the multifaceted influences that shape an individual's propensity for crime.

Life-course theory emphasizes the temporal aspects of human behavior, suggesting that age, social roles, and life events significantly influence an individual's behavior over time. This theory posits that detrimental experiences, such as trauma or adverse childhood events, can increase vulnerability to criminal behavior. Longitudinal studies have demonstrated how individuals' life trajectories can shift dramatically due to meaningful transitions or turning points. For instance, an individual who witnesses or experiences a traumatic event may respond in various ways—some may find resilience and support to recover, while others may become entrenched in criminal activities.

The categorization of life-course factors into cohorts, transitions, trajectories, life events, and turning points is crucial for understanding the dynamics of personal development. Cohorts, representing an individual's social support network, play a pivotal role during major transitions in life, such as moving from adolescence to adulthood. Those with supportive relationships are more likely to navigate these challenges successfully, thereby reducing their likelihood of engaging in criminal behavior. In contrast, individuals facing significant life events without a strong support system may struggle to cope, potentially leading them toward a path of criminality. Thus, the life-course perspective highlights the importance of both biological predispositions and environmental influences in shaping behavior.

In contrast, ENA theory presents a more nuanced approach by blending elements of both nature and nurture. By arguing that criminal activity is influenced by biological instincts while acknowledging the role of learned behavior, ENA theory offers a compelling framework for understanding criminality. The theory suggests that evolution favors traits that enhance survival and reproductive success, leading to competition among individuals. In this perspective, males are often seen as the primary actors in crime due to evolutionary pressures that prioritize traits associated with strength and dominance. For females, modeling of criminal behavior by peers or family members can similarly influence their engagement in crime, as they may perceive such actions as beneficial within their social context.

The implications of ENA theory extend to prevention strategies, which emphasize the importance of addressing both biological and environmental factors associated with criminal behavior. Programs designed to modify underlying neurological or biological issues, coupled with rehabilitative efforts, have the potential to reduce recidivism and support positive behavioral change among offenders. However, the focus on long-term imprisonment for serious offenders raises critical ethical considerations about the role of punishment versus rehabilitation within the criminal justice system.

Ultimately, the exploration of crime and criminal behavior invites continuous inquiry, urging researchers and practitioners to wrestle with complex questions about human behavior. Both life-course and ENA theories offer valuable perspectives for understanding the interplay of nature and nurture in shaping criminal behavior. As research evolves, new insights will emerge, prompting on-going discussions regarding effective interventions and policy implications. In conclusion, while no consensus exists regarding the precise origins of criminality, integrating insights from various theoretical perspectives is essential for fostering a more comprehensive understanding of this multifaceted issue.

References

• Durkheim, É. (1897). Le suicide. Paris: Alcan.
• Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (2003). Life-course desistance: Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed up to age 70. Criminal Justice, 30(3), 199-241.
• Stewart, E. A., & Simons, R. L. (2010). Structure and agency in the explanation of crime: The role of social capital. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(4), 565-590.
• Rafter, N. H. (2008). Criminology: A sociological understanding. Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
• Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47-87.
• Walsh, A. (2010). Criminology. New York: Routledge.
• Siegel, L. J., & Welsh, B. L. (2011). Juvenile delinquency: The core. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.
• Piquero, A. R., & Moffitt, T. E. (2012). The “what” and the “how” of self-control theory: Implications for the future. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 102(3), 429-471.
• Paternoster, R., & Mazerolle, P. (1994). Denying the guilty mind: Criminal subsets and the presumption of innocence. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 85(3), 388-428.
• Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. R. (1983). Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 89(3), 552-584.