Extra Credit Assignment You Need To Get This Right
Extra Credit Assignmentyou Need To Get This Right Because I Could
The assignment involves analyzing two articles that both address the concept of evolution. One article, written by Elizabeth Bumiller, presents an argument, while the other, authored by Lisa Fullam, offers an explanation. The task requires reading both articles carefully and writing a short essay in which you determine which article functions as an argument and which serves as an explanation. Your essay should include a clear thesis statement, develop main points supported by specific references to passages from both articles, and be organized effectively. Additionally, your writing should demonstrate coherence, appropriate diction, varied sentence structure, and correct mechanical skills including spelling and punctuation. The expected length is approximately 1-2 pages, accommodating concise and focused analysis.
Paper For Above instruction
Understanding the distinction between argument and explanation is crucial in scholarly discourse, especially on complex topics such as evolution. Elizabeth Bumiller’s article functions as an argument because it aims to persuade the reader of a particular position regarding evolution, possibly emphasizing implications for policy, society, or scientific interpretation. Conversely, Lisa Fullam’s article provides an explanation, offering insights into the evolution topic without taking a normative stance, but rather clarifying concepts, processes, or historical context.
In Bumiller’s article, the author explicitly advocates a specific viewpoint—perhaps criticizing or supporting a particular evolution-related policy, theory, or societal effect. For example, if Bumiller discusses the controversy surrounding evolution education, her tone and language likely aim to persuade policymakers or the public of her position, employing evidence and rhetorical strategies consistent with argumentation. Specific passages where she asserts claims or directly appeals to the audience’s reasoning serve as proof of her argumentative approach (Bumiller, Year).
In contrast, Fullam’s article functions as an explanation by elucidating the scientific process of evolution, historical development, or philosophical underpinnings without advocating for or against a particular stance. Her purpose is to clarify complex concepts—such as natural selection, genetic mutation, or the philosophy underlying evolutionary theory—through detailed descriptions and factual data. Supporting passages might include definitions, explanations of mechanisms, or summaries of scientific consensus (Fullam, Year).
A thesis statement that clearly distinguishes these roles could be: “Elizabeth Bumiller’s article functions as an argument by advocating a specific position regarding evolution, whereas Lisa Fullam’s article provides a comprehensive explanation of evolutionary concepts without bias.” This thesis guides the subsequent analysis, demonstrating how each article employs different rhetorical strategies aligned with their respective purposes.
To substantiate this claim, it is important to examine explicit markers within the texts. Bumiller’s article likely employs persuasive language, appeals to authority, and confrontational rhetoric to support her claims, illustrating her argumentative intent. Fullam’s article adopts an objective tone, presenting evidence and definitions that serve to clarify rather than persuade.
In conclusion, the distinction between argument and explanation in the context of these articles hinges on their purpose and rhetorical strategies. Recognizing these distinctions enhances our comprehension of how authors communicate complex scientific topics and influences how readers interpret such texts. By correctly identifying Bumiller’s piece as an argument and Fullam’s as an explanation, we can appreciate their respective roles within the discourse on evolution.
References
- Bumiller, Elizabeth. (Year). [Title of her article]. [Journal or source], [Volume(Issue)], pages. URL or DOI if applicable.
- Fullam, Lisa. (Year). [Title of her article]. [Journal or source], [Volume(Issue)], pages. URL or DOI if applicable.
- Additional references supporting the analysis, such as scholarly articles on argumentation, explanation, or evolution theories, formatted appropriately in APA style.