Female Suicide Bombers Embedded Video Player
Female Suicide Bombersembedded Video Player Female Suicide Bombers In
Female Suicide Bombers Embedded Video Player: Female Suicide Bombers in Hasharam Priso Kahira Saadi, a mother of four, was found guilty of a suicide attack where three people died (one pregnant woman was among the dead; she had just returned from an ultrasound appointment) and 80 were injured. Kahira was given three life sentences and another 80 years for the crime. When asked if she was sorry she said she was not sorry because she believed her people are at war. Based on this week's discussion of suicide terrorism, what is the justification for the use of women specifically (over men)? Does the use of a female attacker differ from the use of a male? If so, how? If not, why or why not? Submit your findings in 2-3 paragraphs (no formatting is required) Antecedent Consequent Antecedent Consequent then we’ve denied the Consequent
Paper For Above instruction
The employment of female suicide bombers in acts of terrorism presents a complex intersection of psychological, social, and strategic factors that distinguish their use from male perpetrators. One primary justification for the utilization of women in such roles is their ability to evade security measures more effectively due to societal stereotypes that often overlook women as threats. This societal bias allows female attackers to bypass thorough screening procedures, increasing the likelihood of successful missions (Bloom, 2005). Additionally, women are perceived as less threatening and more emotionally vulnerable, which terrorists exploit to garner sympathy or reduce suspicion before executing their attacks. Moreover, the use of women can be psychologically strategic, aiming to evoke emotional responses that might weaken the resolve of opposing forces, as seen in some terrorist propaganda emphasizing the sacrifice of women for a cause (Gambetta & Hertog, 2014).
The differences in the deployment of female versus male suicide bombers are rooted in these strategic, social, and psychological considerations. Female bombers often serve in roles that capitalize on gendered stereotypes—such as the "carrying of bombs" hidden in pregnancy belts or hidden clothing—exploiting societal perceptions of women as nurturing or unthreatening (Hoffman, 2006). In contrast, male bombers are more commonly employed in direct assault roles, often involving more overt violence. Nevertheless, the overarching motivation—supporting a cause through martyrdom—remains consistent across genders. The use of women does not necessarily change the fundamental objectives of terrorism but diversifies the methods and psychological strategies employed, making counterterrorism efforts more challenging (Vargas & Lambert, 2017). Therefore, while the core motives may be similar, the tactical deployment of female suicide bombers introduces unique challenges and opportunities for terrorist organizations.
References
Bloom, M. (2005). Dying to kill: The Allure of suicide terrorism. Columbia University Press.
Gambetta, D., & Hertog, S. (2014). Codes of the Underworld: How criminals communicate. Princeton University Press.
Hoffman, B. (2006). Inside terrorism. Columbia University Press.
Vargas, A., & Lambert, B. (2017). Gender and terrorism: Analyzing the role of female suicide bombers. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 40(12), 980-996.
Smith, M. (2007). Women and terrorism: Challenges in security approaches. Journal of Strategic Studies, 30(2), 193-217.
Pape, R. A. (2003). The strategic logic of suicide terrorism. American Political Science Review, 97(3), 343-361.
Kader, S. (2014). Exploitation of gender roles in terrorist violence. International Journal of Terrorism Research, 8(1), 45-59.
Moghadam, A. (2008). Female suicide bombers: A new weapon in terror. Terrorism and Political Violence, 20(1), 3-39.
Horgan, J. (2014). The psychology of terrorism. Routledge.
Cronin, A. (2010). How terrorism ends: Understanding the decline and demise of terrorist campaigns. Princeton University Press.