Fin515 Week 3 Project: Financial Statement Analysis Continue

Fin515week 3 Project Financial Statement Analysis Continuedcontinu

Continuing with your Week 2 Project, now your CEO after reviewing your earlier Week 2 PowerPoint submission has asked your team to complete an additional benchmark analysis task, before the upcoming Board Meeting. For this part of the project your team needs to do an analysis of the market and operational characteristics of your company and its financial profile. For this project, your team will need to select four companies that are direct competitors of your company. This sample selection should be based on revenue, profitability, market capitalization, market segment and product characteristics. This project is an additional benchmark data analytics project.

The objective of this part of the project will be to do a comparative financial analysis of your company with the averages of the sample of four companies that will form your comparative group. The project deliverables will be another PowerPoint presentation to the CEO explaining the financial performance of your company compared to the sample of four comparable companies. The analysis should include the following deliverables: 1. An explanation of the logic of the selection of the four comparable group companies. Why were these companies selected?

2. Your team’s data extraction strategy, process and methodology.

3. A financial comparison of your company to the average of the comparator group on the following financial factors:

  • Profitability
  • Debt Management
  • Liquidity
  • Asset Management
  • Value Creation – based on the 3-year trend in Free Cash Flow

In order to complete this project, your team has to select which ratios you are going to use in each of the five categories given above. In addition to that, your team will have to briefly explain why you are selecting the ratios you are using in your benchmark study. Then your team will have to collect the financial data for your company and the financial data of the four competitor companies.

The data can be collected from two financial data bases such as Yahoo Finance, Lexis Nexis, Plunkett, or bizstats.com. Your team will then have to collect and calculate the averages of the four competitor companies. (Please note that no ratio calculations are required for each company, the ratios should be readily available on the websites noted above. You will only need to calculate the average ratios for the four companies combined.) Your team will proceed to developing a PowerPoint presentation presenting the comparison and your team’s commentary of what your team discerns from the comparison. PowerPoint should not have more than ten slides. Just like the previous project your team should use Webex or Voicethread, and prepare an oral presentation that presents your PowerPoint presentation.

Each team member must participate in this presentation.

Paper For Above instruction

Effective financial analysis is imperative for assessing a company's market position and operational efficiency relative to its competitors. This project aims to benchmark your company’s financial health against four selected competitors, providing insights into areas of strength and opportunities for improvement. The process involves strategic selection of comparable firms, systematic data collection, and thorough ratio analysis, culminating in a comprehensive financial comparison presented to executive leadership.

Selection Criteria and Rationalization

Choosing appropriate comparator companies hinges on multiple factors, including revenue, profitability, market capitalization, market segment, and product offerings. The selected companies should mirror your organization's core business activities, size, and market position to ensure the benchmarking results are meaningful. For instance, if your company operates in the technology sector with a focus on software solutions, the competitors should be similarly placed within the same sector and ideally serve the same customer base. This rationale ensures relevance and fairness in the comparative analysis, enabling stakeholders to derive actionable insights.

Data Extraction Strategy and Methodology

The team will utilize reputable financial databases such as Yahoo Finance, LexisNexis, Plunkett Research, or BizStats.com to gather ratio data for your company and your four competitors. The approach involves identifying the companies' official financial statements and extracting key financial ratios readily available on these platforms. The methodology includes standardizing data collection procedures, verifying data accuracy, and calculating the average ratios for the four competitors. Importantly, individual ratio calculations for each company are unnecessary, as pre-calculated ratios are provided. Instead, focus on deriving an average of these ratios to facilitate a fair comparison with your company's ratios.

Financial Ratios and Comparative Analysis

The core of the project involves comparing your company's financial ratios with the average ratios of the four competitors across five categories:

  • Profitability: e.g., Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE)
  • Debt Management: e.g., Debt-to-Equity Ratio, Times Interest Earned
  • Liquidity: e.g., Current Ratio, Quick Ratio
  • Asset Management: e.g., Inventory Turnover, Receivables Turnover
  • Value Creation: trend analysis of Free Cash Flow over three years

Selection of Ratios and Rationale

Ratios should be selected based on their relevance in assessing each category’s health. For example, profitability ratios depict operational efficiency; debt ratios evaluate leverage and solvency; liquidity ratios measure short-term financial stability; asset management ratios reflect operational efficiency in resource utilization; and trend analysis of Free Cash Flow indicates long-term value creation. These ratios are widely used, comparable, and available on the chosen financial databases, ensuring reliability and clarity of the analysis.

Presentation and Interpretation

The final deliverable is a PowerPoint presentation integrating data visuals and narrative commentary. The presentation should juxtapose your company's ratios against the competitor group, highlighting areas of competitive advantage or concern. Each team member must contribute to articulating the analysis, facilitating a collaborative oral presentation. The presentation should be concise, not exceeding ten slides, emphasizing clarity, coherence, and professional insight.

In conclusion, this benchmarking project provides vital intelligence on your company's operational positioning within the industry. By thoroughly selecting comparable firms, systematically collecting data, and critically analyzing ratios, your team can generate insightful conclusions that inform strategic decision-making and investor relations.

References

  • Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2016). Financial Management: Theory & Practice (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • White, G. I., Sondhi, A. C., & Fried, D. (2003). The Analysis and Use of Financial Statements. Wiley.
  • Stickney, C. P., Brown, P., & Wahlen, J. M. (2020). Financial Reporting and Analysis (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Higgins, R. C. (2012). Analysis for Financial Management (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Penman, S. H. (2012). Financial Statement Analysis and Security Valuation. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Damodaran, A. (2012). Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Asset (3rd ed.). Wiley.
  • Gibson, C. H. (2018). Financial Reporting and Analysis (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2012). Business Analysis & Valuation: Using Financial Statements (5th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Garmhausen, M., & Sagers, S. (2017). Financial Ratios for Executives: How to Assess Company Worth and Performance Quickly. Wiley.
  • Allee, D. (2011). Financial Ratios for Executives: A Guide to Understanding Financial Statements. Pearson.

Related Assignments