Final Paper Outline Review And Instructions

Final Paper Outline Review the Final Paper Instruction In Week Five Of

Review the final paper instructions, including the required components such as thesis statement, description of your position and counter-arguments, overall effect on the political system, and resources to be used. Submit an outline containing these elements to receive feedback and up to five points. The outline should include a clear thesis, a brief explanation of your position and opposition, the impact of your issue on the political system, and a list of resources.

Develop your final paper by selecting a contentious political issue from the provided list, forming a logical argument with supporting scholarly sources, and addressing counter-arguments. The paper should be 10 to 12 double-spaced pages, formatted in APA style, with a title page and references. It must contain an introduction with a clear thesis statement, a discussion supporting your position, an analysis of opposing views, an evaluation of the issue’s overall impact on the U.S. political system, and a concluding paragraph reaffirming your thesis.

Use at least six scholarly sources, including your textbook, and cite all sources properly in APA style. The final paper should reflect critical thinking and an understanding of how the issue influences American democracy.

Paper For Above instruction

The development of a comprehensive and coherent final paper begins with a well-structured outline that clearly states the thesis and the core aspects of the argument. The outline should include a succinct thesis statement that directly addresses the chosen political issue, such as whether the U.S. government is too large or whether the media wields excessive influence. This thesis serves as the foundation for the entire paper and guides subsequent sections.

Following the thesis, the outline must briefly describe the author’s position on the issue, supported by scholarly sources that lend credibility and depth to the argument. For example, if the topic is the overexpansion of government, the supporter might argue that it hampers efficiency and individual freedoms, citing empirical research. Equally important is a concise summary of the opposing argument, which should be supported by scholarly evidence. Critically analyze why the opposition’s position may lack validity or credibility, reinforcing your stance with scholarly critique.

The next component of the outline should address the broader effect of the issue on the U.S. political system. This includes evaluating whether the issue has a positive or negative impact on democracy, stability, or governance. This discussion must be substantiated with scholarly sources, offering insights into how the issue influences political processes, public policy, or democratic principles.

Finally, the outline should specify the resources aimed to support the final paper, emphasizing scholarly books, peer-reviewed journal articles, credible media outlets, or government reports. Proper citation and integration of these sources will strengthen the final argument and demonstrate comprehensive research.

In constructing the final paper, the student must begin with an engaging introduction that introduces the issue, states the thesis, and previews main points. The body of the paper should systematically develop the argument, incorporating evidence, addressing counter-arguments, and critically analyzing the issue’s impact. The conclusion must restate the thesis, summarize key points, and offer a final assessment of the issue’s role in American democracy.

This structured approach not only ensures clarity and coherence but also demonstrates critical engagement with the political issue under scrutiny. Proper adherence to APA formatting, including citations and references, will uphold academic standards and facilitate credible scholarly discourse.

References

• Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its Critics. Yale University Press.
• Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. Russell Sage Foundation.
• Kettl, D. F., & Fesler, J. W. (2009). The Politics of the Administrative Process. CQ Press.
• Sunstein, C. R. (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton University Press.
• Meckler, L. (2012). Media and Politics in the Digital Age. Harvard University Press.
• Levi, M. (2013). Trust and Authority in Government and Politics. Cambridge University Press.
• American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
• Mann, T. E., & Ornstein, N. J. (2012). It’s Even Worse Than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided With the New Politics of Extremism. Basic Books.
• Norris, P. (2000). A Virtuous Cycle: Political Communications in Post-Industrial Societies. Cambridge University Press.
• Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (2001). What Are the Origins of Political Trust? Testing Institutional and Cultural Theories in Post-Communist Societies. Comparative Political Studies, 34(1), 30-62.