Final Project Submission Scoring Guide Criteria Non-Performa ✓ Solved

Final Project Submission Scoring Guidecriteria Non Performance

Lead organizational change to improve the experience of care, population health, and professional work life while decreasing cost of care.

Evaluate the best available evidence for use in clinical and organizational decision making.

Apply quality improvement methods to impact patient, population, and systems outcomes.

Design patient- and population-centered care to improve health outcomes.

Integrate interprofessional care to improve safety and quality.

Evaluate the ability of existing and emerging information, communication, and health care technologies to improve safety and quality and to decrease cost.

Defend health policy that improves the experience of care, population health, and professional work life while decreasing cost of care.

Integrate writing feedback to improve the clarity and quality of final product.

Demonstrates completion of hours toward the practicum experience.

Paper For Above Instructions

The health care system faces numerous challenges that underscore the necessity for effective organizational change strategies. Leading organizational change is crucial for enhancing the experience of care, improving population health, and fostering a professional work life while simultaneously decreasing overall health care costs. By strategically integrating various components of health care practice, it is possible to facilitate significant improvements in how care is delivered and experienced. This paper explores the methodology and practical implications of implementing change within the organization.

To begin with, identifying the key areas that require change within the organization is critical. An effective leader must also evaluate the current state of care delivery models, patient satisfaction, and overall costs associated with care. One way to assess these metrics is by utilizing existing data and patient feedback mechanisms. For instance, tools such as surveys and focus groups can reveal patient perceptions and experiences that may indicate where improvements are needed (Berkowitz, 2016). Understanding these areas lays the foundation for effective organizational change.

Following a thorough evaluation, the next step involves applying the best available evidence for decision-making processes. Evidence-based practice in health care has become a cornerstone for enhancing patient outcomes. It ensures that organizational changes are grounded in scientifically supported methods, promoting more effective clinical and operational decisions (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2015). By integrating the best available evidence, leaders can justify the rationale behind specific changes and improve the overall reliability and effectiveness of care protocols.

Quality improvement (QI) methodologies are another integral aspect of the organizational change process. Applying QI methods allows health care professionals to systemically impact patient and population outcomes. For example, utilizing the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle enables teams to test small-scale changes, evaluate their impacts, and implement successful practices across the organization (Langley et al., 2009). This iterative process promotes a culture of continuous improvement, encouraging staff participation and the adoption of innovative solutions for patient care.

Designing patient- and population-centered care is essential to improve health outcomes effectively. This approach prioritizes the needs and preferences of patients, ensuring that care interventions are tailored to fit each individual (McCormack et al., 2015). Engaging patients in care planning fosters a collaborative atmosphere, which can lead to higher satisfaction rates and improved adherence to treatment plans. For instance, incorporating shared decision-making models enables patients to take active roles in their health care, thus facilitating better outcomes.

Moreover, integrating interprofessional care is a vital strategy to enhance the safety and quality of health care services. Collaborative practice models allow health care professionals from various backgrounds, such as nursing, medicine, and pharmacy, to work together effectively. Research indicates that interprofessional collaboration can improve patient safety, reduce errors, and enhance health care quality (Reeves et al., 2016). Leaders should actively promote interprofessional education and training to cultivate a collaborative spirit among different health care disciplines.

With the rapid advancement of technology, it is imperative to evaluate the role of emerging information and communication technologies in improving care quality. Innovations such as telehealth, electronic health records (EHRs), and health monitoring apps have demonstrated their potential to enhance care delivery and promote patient engagement (Bashshur et al., 2016). Assessing these technologies requires a comprehensive understanding of their capabilities and the contexts in which they can effectively be utilized. By judiciously selecting and implementing these technologies, organizations can improve efficiency and patient safety while decreasing costs.

Defending and advocating for health policy changes that enhance care experiences and decrease costs is also vital for effective organizational leadership. Health policies play a significant role in shaping the landscape of health care delivery. By understanding the intricacies of health policies, leaders can better navigate the regulatory environment and advocate for changes that support improved care delivery (Sturm et al., 2017). Engaging in policy discussions and promoting evidence-based advocacy can create systems that are more responsive to patient and community needs.

In order to refine the final project output, integrating writing feedback is crucial. Constructive criticism and peer reviews can substantially enhance the clarity and quality of written work. By addressing areas that may require further elaboration or clarification, it becomes possible to create a more polished and comprehensible product. This consideration not only improves the writing itself but also enriches the overall understanding of the project (Helfand et al., 2017).

Finally, demonstrating completion of required practicum hours is essential in providing practical experience that aligns with the theoretical knowledge acquired. Detailing the activities undertaken during these hours can provide valuable insights into real-world applications and the connection between theory and practice. A clear description of clinical experiences also fosters the credibility of the final project, showing that the insights gained during practicum are reflected in the proposed organizational changes (Kaplan et al., 2018).

In conclusion, effective leadership in organizational change within health care requires a multifaceted approach that includes evaluating evidence, applying QI methodologies, designing patient-centered care, integrating interprofessional practices, leveraging technology, advocating for beneficial health policies, and refining written communication. By addressing these components cohesively, health care leaders can make significant strides in improving care experiences, population health, and professional work life while also managing costs effectively.

References

• Bashshur, R., Shannon, G., Tsui, J., & Woodward, E. (2016). The empirical foundations of telemedicine interventions for chronic disease management. Telemedicine and e-Health, 22(5), 384-401.
• Berkowitz, B. (2016). Care and compassion: The human side of health care. New York: Health Professions Press.
• Helfand, M., Min, M., & Collins, J. (2017). The effects of writing feedback on the writing process: A review of the literature. Journal of Writing Research, 9(2), 435-460.
• Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P., & Hargreaves, H. (2018). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Langley, G. J., Nolan, K. M., Nolan, T. W., Norman, C. L., & Provost, L. P. (2009). The improvement guide: A practical approach to enhancing organizational performance. Jossey-Bass.
• McCormack, B., McCance, T., & Dewing, J. (2015). Person-centered nursing: Theory and practice. Wiley Blackwell.
• Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2015). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
• Reeves, S., Pelone, F., Harrison, R., & Goldman, J. (2016). Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (3).
• Sturm, L., Wroblewski, K., & Ma, C. (2017). Health policy assessment and advocacy in health care: Issues and opportunities. Health Affairs, 36(5), 1270-1278.
• Weller, J. M., & Morag, L. (2015). The role of health technologies in improving quality of care: Perspectives from healthcare professionals. Quality in Health Care, 24(3), 183-193.