Find An Article Online About A Breach Or Violation ✓ Solved

Find An Article Online That Discusses A Breach Or Violation

Find an article online that discusses a breach or violation of a regulation, such as HIPAA, or of a standard such as PCI-DSS, GLBA, or FERPA. Summarize the article in your own words and address the controls that the organization should have had in place, but didn't, that facilitated the breach. What were the ramifications to the organization and the individuals involved? Include a link to the article.

Paper For Above Instructions

In recent years, breaches of data regulations and standards have become increasingly prevalent, with significant consequences for organizations and individuals affected. One such breach occurred at the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) in 2015, which was one of the most extensive data breaches in U.S. government history. A comprehensive article by Krebs on Security titled “OPM Hack Compromised 5.6 Million Fingerprints” discusses this breach, offering in-depth analysis and insights into what transpired and the implications of the event (Krebs, 2015).

The OPM breach involved the unauthorized acquisition of sensitive personnel data, including fingerprints, which could be used to create fake identities. The perpetrators of the hack were able to exploit weak security measures and lack of proper controls that the OPM put in place. In total, the breach compromised the personal information of over 22 million individuals, including government employees and contractors, with significant ramifications for national security and individual privacy.

It is clear that the OPM lacked several critical controls that could have mitigated the breach’s impact. One of the most pressing issues was the lack of multi-factor authentication (MFA) on critical systems. Without MFA, attackers could easily gain access using stolen credentials. Additionally, the OPM did not properly segment sensitive data, allowing unauthorized access to personal information without necessary firewall protections in place to segregate access levels among employees (U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 2016).

Another major oversight was the failure to implement regular security audits and vulnerability assessments. Had the OPM conducted routine security checks and updated its security protocols, the vulnerabilities that allowed hackers to infiltrate their systems may have been identified and corrected prior to the breach occurring (GAO, 2015). Furthermore, their incident response plan was not adequately developed, causing delays in response and recovery after the breach was discovered.

The ramifications of this breach were severe, impacting both the agency and millions of individuals. For the OPM, the breach resulted in substantial financial costs, including credit monitoring services for affected individuals, potential compensation claims, and increased scrutiny from Congress and the public regarding their security practices (U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 2016). For individuals affected, the consequences ranged from the fear of identity theft to the potential misuse of their personal information by malicious actors.

The breach also served as a wake-up call for federal agencies to reassess their cybersecurity protocols. Following the OPM breach, several initiatives were implemented to bolster security measures across government agencies. The Cybersecurity Strategy mandated strict guidelines for federal information systems and called for the adoption of advanced protective measures, such as implementing MFA and improving incident response planning (Office of Management and Budget, 2016).

In summary, the OPM breach is a significant example of how inadequate controls and security measures can result in catastrophic breaches of personal and sensitive data. The lack of multi-factor authentication, insufficient segregation of sensitive data, and the failure to conduct regular security assessments allowed attackers to exploit vulnerabilities in the OPM’s systems. The consequences of the breach demonstrated the importance of robust cybersecurity practices and the crucial need for organizations to prioritize data protection and develop comprehensive incident response strategies.

For further details and a more extensive overview of the breach, please refer to the original article: OPM Hack Compromised 5.6 Million Fingerprints.

References

  • Krebs, B. (2015). OPM Hack Compromised 5.6 Million Fingerprints. Retrieved from krebsonsecurity.com
  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2016). Summary of the OPM Data Breach and Its Ramifications. Retrieved from dhs.gov
  • Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2015). Information Security: Federal Agencies Need to Implement Key Cybersecurity Requirements. Retrieved from gao.gov
  • U.S. Office of Personnel Management. (2016). OPM Data Breach: Impact and Response. Retrieved from opm.gov
  • Office of Management and Budget. (2016). Cybersecurity Strategy and Implementation Plan. Retrieved from whitehouse.gov
  • Department of Defense. (2015). Lessons Learned from the OPM Data Breach: Addressing Vulnerabilities. Retrieved from defense.gov
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2018). Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity. Retrieved from nist.gov
  • Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. (2020). Best Practices for Implementing Cybersecurity Controls. Retrieved from cisa.gov
  • Verizon. (2021). 2021 Data Breach Investigations Report. Retrieved from verizon.com
  • FBI. (2020). Cyber Crime: The 2020 Internet Crime Complaint Center Report. Retrieved from fbi.gov