Find At Least Three Common Food Items That Are Genetically M
Find at least three common food items that have been genetically modified
I need only 2 pages for this assignment and just write APA stylefind A
I Need Only 2 Pages For This Assignment And Just Write APA Stylefind A
I need only 2 PAGES for this assignment and just write APA STYLE Find at least three common food items that have been genetically modified Paragraph 1 – Name the three foods and how they have been modified. List the advantages of Paragraph 2 – List the key points in the argument against GMOs. Paragraph 3 –Take a stand: for or against GMOs. Defend your choice with at least two articles of scientific merit.
Paper For Above instruction
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have become an integral part of modern agriculture, aiming to improve crop yields and resistance to pests and environmental stresses. Three commonly genetically modified food items are corn, soybeans, and papaya. These modifications serve specific purposes: corn has been altered to resist herbicides and pests, soybeans have been modified for herbicide tolerance, and papayas have been genetically engineered to resist the papaya ringspot virus. The advantages of GMOs include increased food production efficiency, reduced reliance on chemical pesticides, and improved resistance to adverse environmental conditions, which can lead to food security and economic benefits for farmers (James, 2017).
Despite these benefits, there are significant arguments against GMOs. Critics highlight concerns about potential environmental impacts, such as gene transfer to non-GMO plants and loss of biodiversity. There are worries regarding the long-term health effects on consumers, as well as corporate control over seed patents that may limit farmers' rights and increase dependency on biotech companies (Fernandez-Cornejo et al., 2014). Additionally, some argue that GMOs could lead to unforeseen ecological consequences, disrupting natural ecosystems and non-target species.
Taking a stance, I am against the widespread adoption of GMOs without comprehensive long-term safety assessments. While GMOs have the potential to increase agricultural productivity, the environmental and health concerns deserve cautious consideration. Scientific studies, such as those by Gómez-Barreto et al. (2020), underscore the importance of rigorous testing of GMO products before they enter the market. Furthermore, the work by Domingo (2016) emphasizes the precautionary principle, advocating for thorough evaluation of GMO impacts to prevent unintended harm. Based on current scientific evidence, it is prudent to regulate GMO development strictly and prioritize alternative sustainable farming practices until more conclusive safety data are available.
References
Domingo, J. L. (2016). Toxicity Studies of Genetically Modified Plants and Foods. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 56(7), 1113–1133. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2012.753253
Fernandez-Cornejo, J., McBride, W. D., Osteen, C., & Martin, S. (2014). Genetically Engineered Crops and Pesticide Use in US Agriculture. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=43707
Gómez-Barreto, D. K., Camacho-Guerrero, A., & Osuna, J. (2020). Safety, Regulatory, and Ethical Perspectives of Genetically Modified Crops and Food. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 18(12), 2133–2146. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13414
James, C. (2017). Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/ GM Crops: 2017. ISAAA Report. https://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/ sbwriteup/default.asp
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Genetically Engineered Crops: Current Status and Future Prospects. National Academies Press.
Perkowski, J., & McHughen, A. (2017). GMO Regulation: The Science-Based Approach. Nature Biotechnology, 35(8), 724–727. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3945