First Part Of This Research Exercise

For The First Part Of This Research Exercise Research The Trend Of Us

For the first part of this research exercise, research the trend of using virtual teams, especially in information technology projects. Begin by reviewing the information on team role theory from the Belbin Team Roles Website. Use other related sources (preferably peer-reviewed or scholarly journals), for this focused research exercise. Write a 2-page APA style summary of your findings. Be sure to include your personal experience and/or opinion on the topic. For example, what role(s) would you play on a team, why, how do you think it’d be different from working face-to-face? Cite at least three references.

Paper For Above instruction

The increasing reliance on virtual teams within information technology (IT) projects reflects a significant shift in how organizations operate and manage collaborative efforts in the digital age. This trend has been propelled by advancements in communication technologies, globalization, and the recent global shift towards remote work due to the COVID-19 pandemic. As organizations adapt to more flexible and geographically dispersed workforces, understanding the dynamics, challenges, and roles within virtual teams becomes crucial.

Research indicates that virtual teams are characterized by geographic dispersion, reliance on information and communication technologies (ICT), and a high degree of independence among team members (Gibson & Gibbs, 2006). The use of virtual teams in IT projects offers numerous benefits, including access to global talent, cost efficiency, and flexibility in work arrangements. However, it also presents unique challenges such as communication barriers, trust development, and the management of diverse cultural expectations.

Team role theory, particularly as outlined by Belbin (2010), provides a valuable framework for understanding individual contributions in virtual settings. Belbin identified nine team roles, including plants, resource investigators, coordinators, shapers, monitor-evaluators, team workers, implementers, completer-finisher, and specialists. In virtual teams, the effectiveness of these roles hinges on clear communication, technological proficiency, and the ability to foster trust among dispersed members. For instance, the role of a coordinator or team worker becomes critical in ensuring cohesion, especially when face-to-face interactions are limited.

From a personal perspective, I believe I would naturally assume the role of a resource investigator in a virtual IT team. My strengths lie in exploring external opportunities, networking, and bringing innovative ideas to the group, which are vital in remote settings where proactive information gathering is necessary. Working virtually, I think communication would differ significantly from face-to-face interactions. Virtual teams rely heavily on digital platforms like Slack, Zoom, or project management tools, which can sometimes lead to misunderstandings or a sense of disconnect. To mitigate this, establishing regular virtual check-ins and fostering open, transparent communication is essential.

The transition from face-to-face to virtual team working impacts social dynamics, trust-building, and accountability. While face-to-face interactions afford immediate feedback and non-verbal cues that facilitate understanding, virtual environments require deliberate efforts to build rapport and clarify expectations. Trust, a cornerstone of effective teamwork, is often cultivated through consistent communication and demonstrated reliability in virtual settings (Jarvenpaa & Leidner, 1999).

In conclusion, the trend towards virtual teams in IT projects offers promising opportunities but also demands new competencies and adaptations. Recognizing individual roles, leveraging technology effectively, and maintaining strong communication are key to maximizing virtual team success. As organizations continue to evolve, understanding these dynamics will remain vital for effective collaboration in increasingly digital workplaces.

References

  • Belbin, R. M. (2010). . Routledge.
  • Gibson, C., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3), 451-495.
  • Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams. Organization Science, 10(6), 791–815.
  • Kirkman, B. L., & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). The Impact of Team Empowerment on Virtual Team Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 343–354.
  • Powell, A., Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2004). Virtual teams: A review of current literature and directions for future research. ACM SIGMIS Database, 35(1), 6–36.
  • Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. L., & Maynard, M. T. (2004). Virtual Teams: What do we Know and Where Do We Go from Here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 835-856.
  • Hambley, L. A., O’Neill, T. A., & Kline, T. J. (2007). Virtual Teams: What do we Know and Where Do We Go from Here? Journal of Management, 33(3), 319-346.
  • Lipnack, J., & Stamps, J. (2000). Virtual teams: Reaching across space, time, and organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Powell, A., & Dent-Micallef, A. (1997). Information technology as competitive advantage: The role of human, business, and technology resources. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 375–405.
  • Purvanova, R. K. (2014). Face-to-Face versus Virtual Teams: What Have We Learned? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15(3), 45-80.

Related Assignments