FOMC Statement December 16, 2009, Go To FRB Press Release

Go To Frb Press Releasefomc Statementdecember 16 2009you Should

Discuss why you believe that the FOMC has made such a decision, and explain the consequences of such a decision on the economy. In your answer, discuss the Federal Reserve’s use of open-market operations to influence the money supply and the respective consequences of such actions. Include a discussion of the money multiplier effect in your response. Justify your conclusions and provide appropriate examples.

Paper For Above instruction

The decision by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) on December 16, 2009, to gradually reduce the pace of its asset purchases, including agency mortgage-backed securities and agency debt, was primarily driven by the evolving economic conditions following the 2008 financial crisis. During this period, the U.S. economy was emerging from a severe recession, and the Federal Reserve aimed to balance promoting economic growth with controlling inflation and financial stability. The initial large-scale asset purchases, known as quantitative easing (QE), were intended to stimulate the economy by increasing the money supply, lowering interest rates, and encouraging borrowing and investment. As economic indicators gradually improved, the FOMC recognized that maintaining exceedingly high levels of asset purchases might lead to potential inflationary pressures or asset bubbles. Consequently, the decision to taper the pace of these purchases reflected a cautious approach towards normalization while still supporting ongoing economic recovery.

Open-market operations, particularly the purchase and sale of government securities and agency securities, are primary tools used by the Federal Reserve to influence the money supply and short-term interest rates. When the Fed purchases securities, it injects liquidity into the banking system, thereby increasing the reserves available to commercial banks. Banks are incentivized to lend more, which in turn expands the broader money supply. Conversely, reducing or stopping these purchases tends to drain excess reserves, slowing the growth of broad money and cooling economic activity when necessary. In this context, the FOMC's tapering of asset purchases was aimed at gradually withdrawing the extraordinary monetary stimulus provided during the crisis to prevent overheating of the economy as recovery took hold.

The money multiplier effect plays a critical role in amplifying the impact of open-market operations on the money supply. This effect describes how an initial increase in reserves, resulting from central bank activity, leads to a proportionally larger expansion in the money supply through the banking system's lending process. For example, if banks hold excess reserves, their ability to lend is limited, constraining the multiplier effect. Conversely, if the reserves are fully loaned out, each dollar of reserve can support multiple dollars of deposits through successive rounds of lending, increasing the overall money supply significantly. Therefore, when the Fed purchases securities and increases reserves, the actual expansion of the money supply depends on the banking system's willingness to extend credit.

The consequences of the FOMC’s decision to taper asset purchases include both benefits and risks. A slow reduction helps avoid disrupting economic stability and prevents sharp increases in interest rates, which could hinder economic growth. However, if the tapering is perceived as premature or too rapid, it might lead to higher borrowing costs, reduced investment, and a slowdown in recovery. On the other hand, a careful tapering process signals the Federal Reserve's confidence in the economic recovery, potentially encouraging investment by reducing uncertainty.

In summary, the FOMC’s decision to gradually reduce the pace of its asset purchases was motivated by a desire to normalize monetary policy as the economy showed signs of recovery while maintaining financial stability. Through open-market operations, the Fed influences the money supply and interest rates, which are further amplified by the money multiplier effect. The balance between stimulus and normalization is delicate—aimed at fostering sustainable growth without provoking inflation or financial instability. This strategic tapering highlights the evolving approach of monetary policy in response to economic conditions, emphasizing the importance of cautious adjustments to support ongoing recovery without unintended adverse effects.

References

• Bernanke, B. S. (2012). The Federal Reserve and the Financial Crisis. Princeton University Press.
• Friedman, B. M., & Schwartz, A. J. (1963). A Monetary History of the United States, 1867–1960. Princeton University Press.
• Gürkaynak, R. S., & Swanson, E. (2007). The Significance of Long-Run Inflation Expectations. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
• Kliesen, K. L., & Rudd, J. B. (2016). The Limits of Quantitative Easing: Evidence from the Federal Reserve's Balance Sheet. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review.
• Krishnamurthy, A., & Vissing-Jorgensen, A. (2011). The Aggregate Demand for Treasury Debt. Journal of Political Economy.
• Mishkin, F. S. (2015). The Economics of Money, Banking, and Financial Markets. Pearson.
• Romer, C. D. (2019). Advanced Macroeconomics. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Svensson, L. E. O. (2010). Inflation Targeting. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review.
• Yellen, J. (2014). The Federal Reserve and the Challenges of Monetary Policy. Federal Reserve Bulletin.
• Woodford, M. (2003). Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy. Princeton University Press.