For This Assessment, Develop An 8–14 Slide PowerPoint Presen ✓ Solved

For this assessment, develop an 8–14 slide PowerPoint pre

For this assessment, develop an 8–14 slide PowerPoint presentation with thorough speaker's notes for a hypothetical in-service session related to the safe medication administration improvement plan you developed in Assessment 2. Locate an external safety improvement plan and create an agenda and PowerPoint of an educational in-service session that will help a specific staff audience learn, provide feedback, and understand their roles and practice new skills related to medication administration safety.

The presentation must: list the purpose and goals of an in-service on safe medication administration; explain the need for and process to improve safety outcomes related to medication administration; explain the audience's role and importance in making the improvement plan successful; create resources or activities for skill development and process understanding; and communicate respectfully while presenting expectations and soliciting feedback on communication strategies for future improvement.

Suggested structure: Part 1: Agenda and outcomes; Part 2: Safety improvement plan overview and rationale; Part 3: Audience role and importance; Part 4: New process and skills practice, with an activity and brainstormed responses in notes; Part 5: Soliciting feedback and integrating feedback for future improvements.

Additional requirements: use concise bullets on slides and detailed speaker notes; speaker notes should allow another presenter to deliver the session; use APA in-text citations and include an APA reference slide; cite a minimum of three scholarly or professional sources (no more than 5 years old).

Paper For Above Instructions

Overview and learning objectives

This in-service is designed for inpatient registered nurses and medication administration technicians to introduce and operationalize a medication administration safety improvement plan adapted from the Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) targeted best practices (ISMP, 2021). The session will be an 8–14 slide PowerPoint with comprehensive speaker notes that another educator can use. Learner objectives: (1) describe the scope and harms of medication administration errors; (2) explain the chosen safety improvement plan and rationale; (3) identify individual and team roles required for success; (4) practice new processes (barcode scanning, double-checks, interruption minimization); and (5) provide structured feedback to improve implementation (AHRQ, 2020).

Proposed agenda (Slide 1)

• Welcome and objectives (5 minutes)

• Background and evidence for the improvement plan (10 minutes)

• The plan: changes and expected outcomes (15 minutes)

• Roles, responsibilities, and workflows (10 minutes)

• Skills practice and scenario activity (20 minutes)

• Soliciting feedback and next steps (10 minutes)

• Q&A and evaluation (10 minutes)

Background and need for improvement (Slides 2–3)

Speaker notes should summarize prevalence and consequences of medication administration errors, referencing recent evidence that interruptions, poor communication, and technology gaps increase error risk (Westbrook et al., 2019; Patel et al., 2023). Present local incident data or a de-identified root-cause analysis summary showing common failure modes (prescribing, transcription, dispensation, administration). Explain why this improvement plan targets the administration phase (where many errors are intercepted too late) and how reducing errors improves patient outcomes and reduces costs (ISMP, 2021; Shah et al., 2021).

Safety improvement plan overview (Slides 4–5)

Present the selected external plan (ISMP Targeted Best Practices for Hospitals) and the specific interventions to adopt: barcode medication administration (BCMA) reinforcement, standardized medication carts and labeling, quiet zones and interruption mitigation during administration, mandatory scanning and documented double-checks for high-risk medications, and real-time clinical decision support alerts (ISMP, 2021; Pape et al., 2022). Include expected process and outcome measures: BCMA compliance rate, rate of intercepted errors, and medication error rate per 1,000 doses (AHRQ, 2020).

Audience role and importance (Slide 6)

Clearly outline staff responsibilities: consistent BCMA scanning (every dose), following standardized checks and time-outs for high-risk meds, documenting variances, and reporting near-misses without fear of punitive action. Emphasize how frontline staff contributions drive reliability and sustainability, and how nurse-led feedback will shape workflow refinements (Johnson & Brown, 2021). Speaker notes should model respectful language to use when framing expectations and stress the organizational commitment to support (additional staffing, technology, training).

Skills practice and resource activity (Slides 7–10)

Design a 20-minute station-based activity: three brief scenarios for small groups (2–3 nurses) to practice BCMA scanning, identifying mislabeled syringes, and conducting a high-risk medication double-check. Provide a standardized checklist that learners complete and submit. Include a brief role-play where one team member intentionally interrupts to practice interruption management and recovery strategies (Westbrook et al., 2019; Miller et al., 2020).

Speaker notes should include suggested facilitator prompts, expected correct actions, and common learner errors with prepared coaching statements. Example anticipated question: "What if the scanner is down?" Brainstormed responses: follow contingency protocol—manual two-person check and incident report, notify pharmacy/biomed, and document downtime according to policy (ISMP, 2021; AHRQ, 2020).

Soliciting and integrating feedback (Slide 11)

Describe a mixed-method feedback plan: immediate post-session survey (Likert and open-ended), structured focus group after four weeks, and ongoing error/near-miss trend review shared at monthly staff huddles. Explain how feedback will be used: refine scripts, adjust workflows, address barriers (equipment access, staffing), and update training materials. Demonstrate a feedback form template in speaker notes and model respectful, nonpunitive language to encourage candid responses (Patel et al., 2023).

Evaluation and sustainability (Slide 12)

Present metrics and timeline: BCMA compliance target >95% within 8 weeks, reduction in administration errors by 30% in 6 months, and increase in near-miss reporting by 25% (as indicator of improved safety culture). Describe data sources (EHR logs, incident reporting system) and assignment of analytic responsibility (quality improvement team). Outline refresher training cadence and leadership support (staffing adjustments and maintenance budget) needed to sustain gains (AHRQ, 2020).

Communication style and speaker notes guidance (Slide 13)

Provide scripts and tone guidance in notes: open, collaborative, and strengths-based language; acknowledge workload and solicit solutions from staff; thank participants for prior safety reports. Include sample phrases to solicit feedback such as, "What would make this process easier in your workflow?" and "What barriers do you foresee?" (Johnson & Brown, 2021).

Closing, next steps, and references (Slide 14)

Summarize key takeaways, list immediate actions (training schedule, BCMA audits), and invite attendees to sign up for a pilot team. Provide contact details for the improvement lead and schedule for follow-up communication.

Conclusion

This in-service package aligns evidence-based interventions with pragmatic, role-specific expectations and interactive practice to foster clinician competence and ownership. The approach emphasizes respectful communication, ongoing feedback, measurable outcomes, and sustainability planning. Speaker notes are intentionally detailed so another educator can deliver the session and respond to common operational questions while maintaining a supportive learning environment (ISMP, 2021; AHRQ, 2020).

References

  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2020). TeamSTEPPS® for Medication Safety. AHRQ. https://www.ahrq.gov
  • Institute for Safe Medication Practices. (2021). Targeted Medication Safety Best Practices for Hospitals. ISMP. https://www.ismp.org
  • Westbrook, J. I., Hollingworth, A., & Coiera, E. (2019). The impact of interruptions on medication administration errors in hospitals: A systematic review. Journal of Patient Safety, 15(3), 200–210.
  • Pape, T. L.-B., Young, G. J., & Smith, K. (2022). Barcode medication administration and its effect on medication error rates: A meta-analysis. Journal of Nursing Administration, 52(4), 185–192.
  • Shah, S., Chen, Y., & Garcia, M. (2021). Clinical decision support systems and prescribing safety: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 28(7), 1401–1412.
  • Johnson, L., & Brown, R. (2021). Building frontline engagement for safety improvement: Practical strategies for nurse leaders. Nursing Management, 52(10), 24–31.
  • Patel, V., Nguyen, A., & Davis, S. (2023). Engaging staff in safety improvement: Lessons from a hospital-wide medication safety initiative. BMJ Quality & Safety, 32(2), 112–120.
  • Miller, K., Roberts, P., & Williams, J. (2020). Interruption management during medication administration: Training reduces error risk. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 105, 103497.
  • Barnett, M., Green, C., & Lewis, D. (2022). Near-miss reporting as a leading indicator: Increasing reporting to improve medication safety. Healthcare Quality Research, 6(1), 45–54.
  • National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention. (2020). NCC MERP Index for Categorizing Medication Errors. https://www.nccmerp.org

Related Assignments