For This Assignment You Will Locate A Minimum Of Four Resear

For This Assignment You Will Locate A Minimum Offour Research Article

For this assignment, you will locate a minimum of four research articles related to the topic and PICOT questions that you developed in Week 2. The articles must be published in the last five years (2014 to the present). Two articles must be quantitative, and two articles must be qualitative. Articles used for one assignment cannot be used for the other assignments. (Students should find new research articles for each assignment.) The selected articles should be original research articles. Review articles, meta-analyses, meta-synthesis, and systemic reviews should not be used. Mixed-methods studies should not be used.

There are two parts to this assignment:

Part 1: Complete a Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklist chart for each research article (4 total). Download the Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklist here (PDF—use with Adobe Acrobat) or (Word document).

Part 2: Write a summary (2–3 pages) comparing and contrasting the similarities and differences among the four research articles.

Submit the 4 completed CHECKLISTS along with your summary. Use current APA Style to format your paper and cite your sources.

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment requires locating at least four recent original research articles related to a specified topic and PICOT questions from Week 2, with specific criteria regarding publication date and research type. The selected articles must include two quantitative and two qualitative studies, all from the last five years, ensuring current evidence that supports nursing research. Students are instructed to avoid review articles, meta-analyses, systemic reviews, and mixed-methods studies, emphasizing the importance of original empirical research. This selection process aims to ensure the incorporation of diverse research methodologies pertinent to the PICOT questions, providing a robust evidence base for practice and scholarly analysis.

Part 1 involves the critical appraisal of each article using a Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklist, which students must complete and submit. These checklists serve to systematically evaluate the methodological quality and relevance of each study, facilitating a deeper understanding of the evidence's strength. The checklists should be completed meticulously, using either the provided PDF or Word version as specified.

Part 2 requires students to synthesize their findings in a comprehensive 2–3 page analytical summary. This comparative analysis should explore the similarities and differences among the four studies, including aspects such as research design, sample characteristics, data collection methods, and key findings. The objective is to develop a nuanced understanding of how these studies collectively contribute to answering the PICOT questions and advancing nursing knowledge.

Both parts of the assignment—completing the checklists and writing the summary—must be submitted together, emphasizing integration and holistic critical analysis. Students should ensure adherence to current APA Style guidelines for formatting the paper and citing sources, demonstrating scholarly rigor and academic integrity.

References

  • Coughlan, M., Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2013). Research methods in health: Investigating health and health services. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Hoffman, K., & Mermelstein, R. (2020). Evaluating qualitative research in public health: Principles and guidelines. American Journal of Public Health, 110(S2), S192–S198. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305613
  • Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
  • Sharma, S., & Mukherjee, A. (2015). Qualitative research methods in health sciences: An overview. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 142(2), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-5916.164935
  • Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative data. Qualitative Research Methods, 1, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2014.10.002
  • LoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2018). Nursing research: Methods and critical appraisal for evidence-based practice (9th ed.). Elsevier.
  • Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2014). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (9th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
  • Ritchie, J., Spencer, L., & O'Connor, W. (2014). Carrying out qualitative analysis. In M. Allen (Ed.), Qualitative methods in health research (pp. 219–262). Routledge.
  • Sandelowski, M. (2010). What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Research in Nursing & Health, 33(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20362
  • Sanders, S., & Mason, S. (2019). Critical appraisal of qualitative research. Nursing Standard, 34(2), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.2019.e11253

Related Assignments