For This Coursework You Will Implement Two Types Of Perceptr

For This Coursework You Will Implement Two Types Of Perceptrons In Mat

Implement two types of Perceptrons in MATLAB and apply them to three datasets. Create functions for training and testing the Perceptron. Use the provided datasets: Breast Cancer Wisconsin, Iris, and Wine, each with specific classification tasks. Experiment with different parameters such as learning rates, number of epochs, random initial weights, and batch versus stochastic learning.

Provide your MATLAB code in a zip file and write a short report describing the implementation, the experiments performed on each dataset, the performance results, and any conclusions drawn from these experiments.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The perceptron, introduced by Frank Rosenblatt in 1958, is one of the foundational algorithms in supervised learning and neural network theory. It serves as a binary classifier that models a linear decision boundary to separate data points into different classes (Rosenblatt, 1958). Despite its simplicity, the perceptron forms the basis for more complex neural network architectures and provides essential insights into the principles of machine learning. This paper discusses the implementation of two types of perceptrons in MATLAB, their application to three diverse datasets, and the exploration of various hyperparameter settings to evaluate their performance.

Types of Perceptrons Implemented

The first type is the classic perceptron, which updates weights continuously after each misclassification, suitable for linearly separable data (Rosenblatt, 1958). The second type is a batch perceptron, which updates weights based on the accumulated errors over a batch of data points, often resulting in smoother convergence (Lippmann, 1987). Both versions are implemented to compare their effectiveness, convergence speed, and stability across different datasets.

Datasets Description

Breast Cancer Wisconsin Dataset

This dataset contains 683 examples of breast cancer diagnoses, characterized by nine attributes derived from digitized images of fine needle aspirates (Wolberg et al., 1992). The goal is to classify each instance as benign (0) or malignant (1). Its binary nature makes it suitable for perceptron-based classification.

Iris Dataset

The Iris dataset includes 150 samples representing three different iris species, categorized by four features: sepal length, sepal width, petal length, and petal width (Fisher, 1936). The goal is to classify the iris species into three classes, presenting a multiclass classification challenge that requires adapting the perceptron or using multiple perceptron classifiers.

Wine Dataset

Comprising 178 examples of wines distinguished by 13 chemical attributes, this dataset aims to classify wines into three different cultivars originating from Italy (Bache et al., 1994). Similar to the Iris dataset, it involves multiclass classification, necessitating the extension of the perceptron to handle multiple classes.

Methodology

The MATLAB implementation involves creating two primary functions: one for training the perceptron and another for testing it. The training function updates weights according to either the perceptron learning rule in an incremental (stochastic) or batch manner, depending on user settings. The testing function computes predictions based on learned weights and compares them with actual labels to evaluate performance.

For each dataset, experiments vary key hyperparameters such as learning rate, number of epochs, initial weights, and whether learning is batch or stochastic. Multiple runs with different initial weights assess the robustness and stability of each perceptron type. Performance metrics, including accuracy, confusion matrices, and convergence behavior, are recorded and analyzed.

Implementation Details

The MATLAB code comprises functions such as trainPerceptron and testPerceptron. The training function initializes weights randomly, then iteratively updates them based on the selected mode (batch or stochastic) until convergence or a specified epoch limit. The testing function applies the learned weights to new data, producing class predictions.

Given the datasets' differing characteristics, data preprocessing includes normalization and encoding of categorical labels into numerical form suitable for perceptron input. For multiclass classification, a one-vs-rest approach is typically employed, training separate perceptrons for each class.

Results and Discussion

The experiments demonstrate that the perceptron’s performance depends heavily on hyperparameters. Smaller learning rates often resulted in slower convergence but better stability, whereas larger rates led to faster learning with potential overfitting or oscillations. Batch learning generally provided smoother convergence than stochastic updates, especially on the Iris and Wine datasets.

The perceptron successfully classified the Breast Cancer dataset with high accuracy under optimized parameters, confirming its effectiveness in binary, linearly separable scenarios. For multiclass problems (Iris and Wine datasets), extending the perceptron with a one-vs-rest scheme yielded reasonable results, though more complex algorithms like multinomial logistic regression or multilayer perceptrons generally outperform simple perceptrons in these contexts.

Variations in initial weights introduced variability in convergence speed but not in overall accuracy, suggesting that random initialization does not detrimentally impact the perceptron’s capacity, provided training runs sufficiently long.

Conclusions

The implementation of two perceptron types and their application to diverse datasets illustrates the perceptron’s strengths in straightforward, linearly separable binary classification tasks and highlights its limitations in multiclass environments. Hyperparameter tuning significantly influences performance, emphasizing the necessity of experimentation in machine learning workflows. While simple perceptrons are instructive and computationally efficient for certain problems, more sophisticated models are warranted for complex, non-linear, or multiclass datasets.

Future work could involve extending this implementation to kernel perceptrons, multilayer networks, or integrating adaptive learning rate mechanisms, thereby broadening applicability and improving classification accuracy.

References

  • Fisher, R. A. (1936). The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Annals of Eugenics, 7(2), 179-188.
  • Bache, K. C., Lichman, M., & others. (1994). UCI Machine Learning Repository: Wine Data Set. University of California, Irvine, School of Information and Computer Sciences.
  • Lippmann, R. P. (1987). An Introduction to Computing with Neural Nets. IEEE ASSP Magazine, 4(2), 4-22.
  • Rosenblatt, F. (1958). The Perceptron: A Probabilistic Model for Information Storage and Organization in Brain. Psychological Review, 65(6), 386-408.
  • Wolberg, W. H., et al. (1992). Computer-based detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 11(6), 59-65.
  • Fisher, R. A. (1936). The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Annals of Eugenics, 7(2), 179-188.
  • Mitchell, T. M. (1997). Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Haykin, S. (1998). Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. Prentice Hall.
  • Ng, A. Y. (2004). Feature Selection, L1 vs. L2 Regularization, and Rotations. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Machine Learning.
  • Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning. MIT Press.

Related Assignments