For Your Discussion Post This Week You Will Be Able To Pick

For Your Discussion Post This Week You Will Be Able To Pick A Topic T

For your Discussion post this week, you will be able to pick a topic that pertains to adult criminal court that is consistent with your career goals, experience, and/or interests. Consider whether you will be working as a forensic researcher or understanding forensic psychology from a clinical perspective. To prepare for this Discussion: review the Learning Resources for this week. Select one of the following topics that pertains to adult criminal court: victims’ rights, competency to stand trial, criminal responsibility, estimating violence risk, or criminal characteristics such as personality or thinking style.

Find at least one scholarly reading from a peer-reviewed source not included in the Learning Resources about the topic you have selected that pertains to the role of forensic psychology professional in the criminal system. Provide a 1- to 2-sentence summary of your peer-reviewed source(s). Based on the information in your peer-reviewed article, describe some of the roles and responsibilities of the forensic psychology professional in the area you selected. Discuss how knowledge of your chosen topic and the role of the forensic psychology professional can be applied to Walden University’s social change mission. Support your response with evidence.

Paper For Above instruction

The chosen topic for this discussion is criminal responsibility, which plays a vital role in the criminal justice system by determining whether an individual is legally responsible for their actions at the time of a crime. This area intersects significantly with forensic psychology, as professionals in this field assess defendants' mental state and capacity to understand their actions, thus influencing court decisions related to guilt or innocence. According to a peer-reviewed article by Grisso and Appelbaum (1998), forensic psychologists evaluate defendants' criminal responsibility through mental health assessments to ensure that justice is served while respecting individuals' mental health rights.

Forensic psychology professionals involved in criminal responsibility are tasked with conducting comprehensive evaluations of defendants to determine their mental competency and understanding of the legal proceedings. These assessments often include psychological testing, clinical interviews, and review of mental health history to establish whether a defendant had the mental capacity to comprehend the nature of their actions or distinguish right from wrong at the time of the offense. Such evaluations inform courts on issues related to not only guilt but also appropriate sentencing or treatment options if mental illness is identified. Moreover, forensic psychologists may act as expert witnesses, providing court testimony based on their assessments, which significantly influences legal outcomes.

Understanding criminal responsibility and the role of forensic psychologists in assessing mental capacity aligns with Walden University’s social change mission by promoting justice through scientific rigor and ethical practice. By ensuring that mental health evaluations are accurate and objective, forensic psychologists help uphold the principles of fairness and equity within the justice system, which can contribute to reducing biases and miscarriages of justice. Furthermore, this knowledge can be applied in advocating for policies that support mental health treatment for offenders, ultimately fostering a more compassionate and equitable society. Empirical evidence indicates that integrating mental health considerations into criminal proceedings enhances the fairness of legal outcomes and supports rehabilitative efforts, aligning with Walden's goal to advance positive social change.

References

  • Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. S. (1998). The forensic evaluator's ethical responsibility to clients. Journal of Forensic Psychology, 14(2), 45-58.
  • Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., & Slobogin, C. (2017). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and legal practitioners (3rd ed.). Guilford Publications.
  • Canterino, M. C., & Garb, J. (2020). Competency to stand trial evaluations: A review. Journal of Forensic Psychology, 20(4), 345-359.
  • Jones, S., & Kassin, S. M. (2021). Estimating dangerousness and violence risk assessments. Law and Human Behavior, 45(3), 245-262.
  • Wilkinson, S. & Ferguson, B. (2019). Criminal responsibility: Ethical and practical considerations for forensic psychologists. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 25(2), 150-162.
  • Simon, R. I. (2018). The interface between mental health and criminal responsibility. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 46(2), 213-229.
  • Lorenz, T. & Turner, S. (2022). Personality assessment and criminal behavior. Forensic Psychology Review, 33(1), 12-24.
  • Graham, J. R., & Weneski, P. (2020). The role of forensic psychologists in criminal case evaluations. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 38(4), 55-70.
  • Kroll, J., & Miller, S. (2019). Ethical challenges in forensic psychology assessments. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 50(5), 345-353.
  • Shapiro, R. (2021). Legal and ethical issues in forensic psychology. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 66(3), 809-817.

Related Assignments