From The First And Second E Activities Evaluate Their Effect

From The First And Second E Activities Evaluate The Effectiveness Of

From the first and second e-Activities, evaluate the effectiveness of Dell’s current turnaround strategies. Present at least three (3) examples to support your evaluation. Dell’s turnaround strategy focused on changing the mode of selling PCs to customers, shifting from a direct-sales model to offering computers through retail outlets. This strategy aimed to increase revenue following previous losses. The supply chain and manufacturing costs were modified—moving away from internal production and opening manufacturing branches elsewhere to reduce costs and increase accessibility. Changing sales channels to include retail outlets and introducing new products also contributed to the strategic overhaul.

The effectiveness of these strategies can be assessed through specific examples. Firstly, reducing product prices made computers more affordable, encouraging faster market penetration and higher sales volumes, thereby increasing revenue. When product prices decrease to a level accessible to a broader consumer base, sales tend to accelerate, resulting in quick revenue gains (Shirani, 2012). Secondly, expanding manufacturing locations improved product accessibility, enabling more customers to purchase locally, which in turn enhanced sales figures and revenue. Local manufacturing reduces logistical costs and delivery times, making products more attractive to consumers (Rao, 2009). Thirdly, shifting to indirect sales channels by partnering with retail agents extended the distribution network, increasing product availability and demand. Retailers act as intermediaries, facilitating faster movement of products and wider reach, thus driving higher sales volumes and revenue growth.

As for new product introductions, launching innovative models such as updated mice, desktops, or laptops attracted new customer segments and stimulated demand within the initial months. This strategy aligns with the concept that new products generate higher demand in early phases, contributing to revenue enhancement (Rao, 2009). The added product offerings diversify Dell’s portfolio, catering to various customer preferences and technological needs, ultimately boosting the company's market share and profitability.

Paper For Above instruction

Analyzing Dell's current turnaround strategies reveals their significant impact on the company's performance, especially through supply chain and sales channel innovations. The move from internal manufacturing to an expanded manufacturing footprint globally has been crucial in reducing costs and improving product accessibility. Cost reduction strategies, such as outsourcing manufacturing and expanding production bases, have enabled Dell to lower retail prices, making their products more competitive in the global market. These strategic adjustments are particularly vital in a highly competitive industry where price sensitivity influences consumer purchasing decisions.

Furthermore, shifting from a purely direct-sales model to incorporating retail outlets has broadened Dell’s market reach. The retail strategy has increased product visibility and availability, enabling Dell to tap into customer segments that prefer brick-and-mortar shopping experiences. This multilayered distribution network complements online sales, offering consumers multiple avenues to purchase Dell products easily. The expansion into retail outlets also mitigates risks associated with over-reliance on direct online channels and diversifies revenue streams (Shirani, 2012).

Additionally, Dell’s emphasis on innovation through introducing new product models has helped rejuvenate its brand and attract technological early adopters. Launching new models capitalizes on consumer interest in the latest technology, boosting initial sales and market share. This aligns with the concept that innovative product launches typically generate substantial demand shortly after release, contributing positively to revenue (Rao, 2009). Dell's ability to rapidly respond to technological trends through product development has strengthened its competitive position in the industry.

Looking specifically at how these strategies have influenced industry positioning, Dell’s transition to a flexible supply chain and diversified sales channels has helped mitigate the decline in industry demand by reaching a broader customer base. Although the PC industry has been experiencing a downturn—partly due to market saturation and increased competition—Dell’s strategic adaptations have allowed it to maintain revenue streams more effectively than competitors still heavily reliant on a singular sales approach (Rao, 2009).

Regarding Dell’s strength over competitors within a declining industry, its ability to reduce costs and expand manufacturing and sales channels remains a significant advantage. While competitors like HP have struggled with supply chain inefficiencies and higher prices, Dell’s cost leadership and diversified distribution give it a competitive edge. For instance, Dell’s operational flexibility allows it to quickly adjust production volumes and sales strategies in response to market shifts, a crucial strength in a declining industry environment (Shirani, 2012).

In conclusion, Dell’s current turnaround strategies—cost reductions, expansion of manufacturing facilities, diversification of sales channels, and product innovation—have collectively contributed to stabilizing and enhancing its market position. These initiatives have enabled Dell to respond dynamically to industry challenges, retain customer interest, and sustain revenue growth, despite the overall decline in the PC industry.

References

• Rao, V. R. (2009). Handbook of pricing research in marketing. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
• Shirani, M. (2012). Strategy Creation and Change - Dell Corporation. München: GRIN Verlag GmbH.
• Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2017). Strategic management: Concepts and cases: Competitiveness and globalization. Cengage Learning.
• Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
• Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics & supply chain management. Pearson UK.
• Chong, A. Y. L., Lo, C. K., & Weng, X. (2017). The impact of big data analytics capabilities on supply chain agility: Information sharing and supply chain collaborative advantage as mediators. International Journal of Production Economics, 192, 192-204.
• Li, S., Ragu-Nathan, B., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Subba Rao, S. (2006). The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance. Omega, 34(2), 107-124.
• Frohlich, M. T., & Westbrook, R. (2001). Demand chain management in manufacturing. Journal of Operations Management, 19(2), 185-200.
• Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2016). Supply chain management: Strategy, planning, and operation. Pearson.
• He, Y., & Li, L. (2014). Effects of supply chain integration and information sharing on supply chain performance. International journal of production economics, 143(2), 333-345.