Global Health Comparison Grid Template Use This Docum 359614

Global Health Comparison Grid Templateuse This Document To Complete Th

Use this document to complete the Module 6 Assessment Global Healthcare Comparison Matrix and Narrative Statement. Describe the policy in each country related to the identified healthcare issue, including its strengths and weaknesses. Explain how social determinants of health impact the issue with specific examples. Discuss how each country's government has addressed cost, quality, and access. Describe the policy's impact on global population health with concrete examples. Consider the potential effects of the policy on the role of nurses in each country. Analyze how global health issues influence local healthcare organizations and policies, providing specific examples.

Paper For Above instruction

The global health landscape is complex and multifaceted, demanding comprehensive understanding of policies that influence health outcomes across different nations. In this analysis, we compare healthcare policies related to a specific international health issue—such as diabetes management—focusing on the United States and another country, for example, Canada. This comparison highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each policy, examines social determinants affecting the issue, and evaluates governmental approaches to managing cost, quality, and access. Furthermore, it considers how these policies impact broad population health, the nursing profession, and local healthcare organizational structures.

Healthcare Policies in the United States and Canada

In the United States, healthcare policy regarding diabetes management is primarily driven by insurance coverage models, including Medicaid, Medicare, and private insurance. The Affordable Care Act introduced reforms aimed at increasing coverage and control over costs. Strengths of US policies include widespread technological innovation and a broad array of treatment options. However, weaknesses are evident in disparities in access, high costs, and inconsistent quality control, often linked to Insurance coverage gaps and socioeconomic disparities.

Canada’s approach is characterized by a publicly funded healthcare system, primarily governed at the provincial level, ensuring universal access to essential services. The strengths of Canadian policies include equitable access and cost control through government regulation, but challenges involve longer wait times and variability in service delivery across provinces.

Impact of Social Determinants of Health

Social determinants such as income, education, environment, and social support significantly influence diabetes outcomes. In the US, socioeconomic disparities lead to higher prevalence and poorer management among marginalized populations, exacerbated by food insecurity, limited access to healthy foods, and unsafe environments that hinder physical activity (Zhang et al., 2018). Conversely, Canada's universal system mitigates some socioeconomic barriers, yet Indigenous populations and rural communities often experience disparities in care access and health literacy, impacting disease management (Kirmayer et al., 2019).

Government Strategies on Cost, Quality, and Access

The US government employs initiatives like the National Diabetes Prevention Program to address prevention and reduce long-term costs while incentivizing providers through value-based care models. Despite such efforts, high treatment costs and insurance gaps persist. Canada’s federal and provincial governments focus on equitable access through publicly funded coverage, emphasizing prevention and early intervention. Still, system wait times and resource allocation challenges impact timely access and quality of care.

Policy Impact on Population Health

Both countries have made strides in reducing diabetes-related complications through policy initiatives. The US’s focus on innovation and personalized medicine has yielded improvements but also widened health disparities. Canada's emphasis on universal care has resulted in overall better population outcomes, although some underserved communities remain at risk. For instance, studies show lower hospitalization rates for diabetes complications in Canada compared to the US (Statistics Canada, 2020).

Impact on the Nursing Role

The policies shape nursing practice by expanding roles in patient education, chronic disease management, and community outreach. In the US, nurses often serve as care coordinators to bridge insurance and social service gaps. In Canada, nurses play pivotal roles in community health and preventive care, often functioning autonomously within the public system. Both contexts require nurses to adapt to evolving policies emphasizing patient-centered and team-based care (American Nurses Association, 2021; Canadian Nurses Association, 2020).

Local Healthcare Organizations and Policies

Global health issues like diabetes influence local policies and healthcare organization priorities. In the US, hospitals and clinics implement screening programs aligned with federal initiatives, often facing financial constraints related to policy coverage gaps. Canadian healthcare organizations focus on community-based diabetes prevention programs, leveraging public funding. Both countries grapple with integrating global health strategies into local practices to meet population needs effectively.

Conclusion

Analyzing healthcare policies around a common global health issue reveals varied strategies driven by systemic structures, economic resources, and social factors. While the US emphasizes innovation and targeted interventions, it struggles with disparities and high costs. Canada’s universal approach promotes equity but faces systemic capacity issues. Recognizing these differences enables health professionals, especially nurses, to navigate policy landscapes effectively, advocate for equitable care, and contribute to improving health outcomes globally.

References

  • American Nurses Association. (2021). Nursing scope and standards of practice. ANA Publishing.
  • Canadian Nurses Association. (2020). Code of ethics for registered nurses. CNA.
  • Kirmayer, L. J., Brass, G. M., & Tait, C. L. (2019). Indigenous health in Canada. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 64(8), 689-696.
  • Statistics Canada. (2020). Diabetes hospitalizations and outcomes. Government of Canada.
  • Zhang, Y., Lee, S. M., & Lee, S. (2018). Social determinants of health and diabetes care in the United States. Journal of Public Health Policy, 39(2), 225-238.
  • World Health Organization. (2022). Global report on diabetes. WHO Press.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). National diabetes statistics report. CDC.
  • Health Canada. (2019). Canadian diabetes strategy: Addressing health disparities. Government of Canada.
  • Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (2020). Value-based care models in practice. IHI Publications.
  • Gellad, W. F., & Mor, M. K. (2020). Improving diabetes care in vulnerable populations. Diabetes Care, 43(8), 165-172.

Related Assignments