Gloria The Investor — Analyzing Undervalued Stocks And Inves
Gloria The Investor — Analyzing undervalued stocks and investment options
Gloria, a seasoned sales manager with significant experience in sales but limited knowledge of investing, has decided to invest $75,000 outside her company's 401K plan. She has recently started using online brokerage services and is interested in undervalued stocks that can outperform the market over time. She contacts ABC Investments and receives a list of 15 stocks believed to be undervalued.
The task involves evaluating these stocks using financial models, specifically calculating the required rate of return via the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), valuing the stocks using the constant growth dividend discount model, and analyzing whether the calculated values align with current market prices. The broader implications for Gloria and market efficiency theory are also to be discussed.
Paper For Above instruction
Investment decision-making in the stock market involves complex analyses combining quantitative valuation models and qualitative insights. For a novice investor like Gloria, understanding how to evaluate stocks effectively aids in making informed decisions that align with financial goals. This paper applies financial theory and models to analyze a set of undervalued stocks, considering the relevance of market efficiency theories, to guide Gloria's investment strategy.
To assess the selected stocks, the first step involves calculating the required rate of return using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). CAPM stipulates that the expected return on a stock equals the risk-free rate plus the stock’s beta times the market risk premium. The risk-free rate is given as 4.30%, the beta values are provided for each stock, and the market return is assumed to be 11.90%. The calculation follows:
Ke = Krf + β(Km – Krf)
Where:
Krf = Risk-free rate = 4.30%
β = Stock beta
Km = Market return = 11.90%
For example, for stock with beta 1, the required return would be:
Ke = 4.30% + 1(11.90% – 4.30%) = 4.30% + 7.60% = 11.90%
This calculation is repeated for each stock based on their individual beta values, enabling Gloria to understand the minimum return she should expect for each stock given its risk profile.
Next, applying the constant growth dividend discount model (Vcs) allows valuation of each stock. The model is expressed as:
Vcs = D1 / (Ke – g)
D1 represents the expected dividend one year from now and is calculated as the last paid dividend multiplied by (1 + g). The growth rate g is derived from the five-year dividend growth trend, calculated as:
g = [(Dt / D0)]^(1/5) – 1
Using these formulas, we compute the intrinsic value of each stock and compare these to the current market prices to evaluate whether each stock is undervalued or overvalued. If the intrinsic value exceeds the current market price, the stock is potentially undervalued and might warrant investment.
When comparing calculated values to market prices, deviations could result from market inefficiencies, investor sentiment, or temporary mispricings. Differences suggest that markets are not perfectly efficient, as some stocks remain undervalued or overvalued relative to their intrinsic worth.
For Gloria, understanding these calculations assists in selecting stocks that align with her risk tolerance and investment objectives. Stocks undervalued according to the models may represent good opportunities, but she should also consider qualitative factors and the broader economic outlook.
This analysis directly relates to market efficiency theories—specifically, the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH). If markets were perfectly efficient, stock prices would always reflect their intrinsic values, making valuation models redundant. However, the presence of discrepancies as revealed by the models indicates that markets allow for some inefficiencies, providing opportunities for astute investors like Gloria to gain excess returns through fundamental analysis.
In conclusion, combining CAPM-based required returns with dividend discount valuation provides a structured approach for new investors to evaluate stocks. Such models, while insightful, should be supplemented with other qualitative assessments and an awareness of market realities. For Gloria, these tools can help mitigate investment risks and capitalize on undervalued opportunities, aligning her portfolio with her financial goals while recognizing the limitations of market efficiency assumptions.
References
- Bodie, Z., Kane, A., & Marcus, A. J. (2014). Investments (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
- Fabozzi, F. J. (2016). Bond Markets, Analysis, and Strategies. Pearson Education.
- Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417.
- Graham, B., & Dodd, D. L. (2008). Security Analysis. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Lintner, J. (1965). The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(1), 13–37.
- Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425–442.
- Ross, S. A. (1976). The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing. Journal of Economic Theory, 13(3), 341–360.
- Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R., & Jordan, B. D. (2018). Fundamentals of Corporate Finance. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Damodaran, A. (2012). Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Asset. Wiley Finance.
- Schroeder, L., Clark, M., & Cathey, J. (2005). Financial Accounting Theory and Analysis. Oxford University Press.