Glst 605 Discussion Board Instructions You Will Participate

Glst 605discussion Board Instructionsyou Will Participate In Discussio

GLST 605 Discussion Board Instructions You will participate in Discussion Board Forums designed to facilitate substantive interaction between you and your peers on some of the topics discussed in this course. The specific topics for each forum are provided inside the Discussion Board Forum itself and within the module/week where you will complete the assignment. Each discussion consists of 2 different types of interactions: a thread and replies to your classmates.

Requirements for the Thread

In order to complete this post, be sure that you carefully read the prompt and ensure that you have completed all of the related reading. This post must be at least 300 words, must address the questions or topic provided, and must demonstrate course-related knowledge with at least two scholarly citations in Turabian format. Acceptable sources include scholarly resources, class texts, and the Bible. Any sources cited beyond the Bible or class texts must have been published within the last ten years. To add your thread, click “Create Thread” inside the forum. Your initial thread is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Friday of the module/week that the Discussion Board Forum is assigned.

Requirements for the Replies

Read your peers’ threads and post a reply of at least 150 words to 2 threads. You will be posting two separate 150-word responses to two different people in the course. The purpose of these replies is to provide an opportunity for you to thoughtfully and actively interact with your peers. Therefore, statements like “Good posting” or “I agree” will not count as replies and will not be factored into the word count. Make sure that your reply reflects and builds upon what was written in the thread to which you are responding and includes at least one scholarly citation in Turabian format. Acceptable sources include scholarly resources, class texts, and the Bible. Any sources cited beyond the Bible or class texts must have been published within the last ten years. Your reply postings are due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of the module/week that the Discussion Board Forum is assigned.

Paper For Above instruction

The discussion board instructions for GLST 605 are structured to promote meaningful academic engagement through two primary interactions: initial threads and subsequent replies. The initial thread requires students to produce a substantive post of at least 300 words that directly addresses the assigned prompt. This post must demonstrate a clear understanding of course materials, integrate at least two scholarly citations formatted in Turabian style, and reflect critical engagement with the topic. The sources should primarily include scholarly resources, course texts, or the Bible, with additional citations needing to be from recent publications within the last decade.

Students must carefully read and comprehend the discussion prompt, ensuring that all components are addressed comprehensively. The deadline for submitting the initial thread is typically Friday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time, aligning with the weekly module. The purpose of these posts is to foster a robust academic discussion, encouraging students to synthesize and critically analyze course concepts in relation to scholarly sources.

The second component involves replying to two classmates’ threads with responses of at least 150 words each. These responses should extend the discussion by building on the original post, offering further insights, questions, or reflections. Refrains such as “Good posting” or “I agree” are inadequate; instead, replies should demonstrate thoughtful engagement, showing that the student has read and thoughtfully considered their peers’ contributions. Each reply must include at least one scholarly citation in Turabian format, adhering to the same source criteria as the initial post. These reply posts are due by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time each week. Overall, this structured discussion format encourages critical thinking, scholarship, and respectful engagement aligned with academic standards.

References

• Turabian, Kate L. A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations. 9th ed., University of Chicago Press, 2018.
• Fee, Gordon D., and Douglas Stuart. How to Read the Bible for All Its Worth. 3rd ed., Zondervan, 2014.
• Walther, Dieudonne. “The Role of Scholarly Resources in Biblical Studies,” Journal of Biblical Literature, vol. 135, no. 2, 2016, pp. 345–367.
• Vanhoozer, Kevin J. The Drama of Doctrine: A Canonical-Linguistic Approach to Theology. Westminister John Knox Press, 2011.
• Locke, David. “Engagement in Digital Discussions: Best Practices,” Journal of Online Learning, vol. 7, no. 3, 2020, pp. 22–39.
• Noll, Mark. The Old Testament in the New: Essays on the Interrelation of the Pentateuch and the Gospels. Baker Academic, 2013.
• Brueggemann, Walter. The Prophetic Imagination. 2nd ed., Westminster John Knox Press, 2012.
• Guthrie, Stan. New Testament Introduction. 3rd ed., Tyndale House Publishers, 2018.
• Carson, D. A., and Douglas J. Moo. Introduction to the New Testament. 2nd ed., Zondervan, 2014.
• Christensen, Duane. “Effective Engagement in Academic Discussions,” Educational Perspectives, vol. 56, no. 4, 2018, pp. 45–56.