Go To The Website Of The Federal Reserve Board
Go To The Web Site Of The Federal Reserve Board At Wwwfederalreser
Go to the Web site of the Federal Reserve Board at and find the section describing monetary policy tools. Which unconventional tools employed during the financial crisis of has the Fed stopped using? What do you think determined the order in which various facilities were shut down? Which, if any, of the tools still remain in operation?
Explain why both the Federal Reserve and the ECB use an overnight interest rate rather than a longer-term interest rate as their policy tool.
Explain the mechanics of a speculative attack on the currency of a country with a fixed exchange-rate regime.
Explain why a well-capitalized domestic banking system might be important for the successful maintenance of a fixed exchange-rate regime.
Why is inflation higher than money growth in high inflation countries and lower than money growth in low inflation countries?
Describe the impact of financial innovations on the demand for money and velocity.
Paper For Above instruction
Go To The Web Site Of The Federal Reserve Board At Wwwfederalreser
The Federal Reserve, as the central bank of the United States, employs a variety of monetary policy tools to influence economic activity, control inflation, and promote financial stability. During the financial crisis of 2007-2008, the Fed implemented several unconventional monetary policy tools to provide liquidity and stabilize the financial system when traditional tools, such as adjusting the federal funds rate, were insufficient. Many of these tools have since been phased out as the economic conditions improved, although some still remain in use today.
One of the primary unconventional tools employed during the crisis was the use of asset purchase programs, commonly known as quantitative easing (QE). The Fed bought large quantities of longer-term securities, including government bonds and mortgage-backed securities, to lower long-term interest rates and support borrowing and investment. As the economy recovered, the Fed began tapering these purchases and eventually stopped expanding its balance sheet through QE. The cessation was influenced by the improvement in economic conditions, declining financial market stress, and the desire to normalize monetary policy without causing financial market disruptions.
Another tool was the establishment of liquidity facilities, such as the Term Auction Facility (TAF), the Commercial Paper Funding Facility (CPFF), and the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF). These facilities provided short-term funding to financial institutions and markets facing liquidity shortages. Over time, as market conditions stabilized and the banking sector regained resilience, the Fed phased out these emergency facilities. Their shutdown was typically driven by the easing of liquidity strains and the desire to unwind extraordinary support measures to restore normal market functioning.
Of the unconventional tools used during the crisis, some, like the main policy interest rate (the federal funds rate), still operate as core instruments of monetary policy. Others, like the specific emergency facilities, have been discontinued or are no longer active. The Federal Reserve continues to use its asset purchase programs in a limited and strategic manner, which can be considered an ongoing form of unconventional policy, but the use of emergency lending facilities has largely ceased as markets and institutions have returned to normal functioning.
Both the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank (ECB) utilize an overnight interest rate—namely the Federal Funds Rate and the Deposit Facility Rate respectively—to set monetary policy because short-term rates are more responsive and controllable. Short-term interest rates influence broader financial conditions quickly, affecting borrowing costs, consumer spending, and investment. Longer-term rates, while also important, are more influenced by expectations of future short-term rates and market perceptions, making them less directly controllable by central banks.
Using an overnight rate aligns with the central banks' operational frameworks, allowing them to conduct monetary policy through a well-understood and manageable target. Moreover, short-term rates are integral to financial market functioning, providing a benchmark for other interest rates, and enabling the central bank to implement policy adjustments efficiently and transparently.
A speculative attack on a currency with a fixed exchange-rate regime occurs when investors, believing that the currency is overvalued or that the country's economic fundamentals cannot sustain the peg, begin to sell the currency in anticipation of devaluation or force a devaluation by exhausting the country's foreign currency reserves. If the market perceives that the central bank cannot defend the fixed rate—due to insufficient reserves or macroeconomic imbalances—these speculators may accelerate their selling, betting that the central bank will run out of foreign exchange reserves, triggering a currency crisis.
This attack typically involves massive capital outflows, simultaneously attempting to deplete reserves and force the central bank to abandon the peg. To defend the fixed rate, the central bank may need to buy its own currency using foreign reserves, which becomes unsustainable if reserves are exhausted or if market sentiment worsens. Once reserves are depleted, the peg collapses, leading to a devaluation or a change to a different exchange rate regime, with significant economic repercussions.
A well-capitalized domestic banking system is essential for the successful maintenance of a fixed exchange-rate regime because it ensures that banks have sufficient buffers to absorb shocks, support liquidity needs, and facilitate foreign exchange interventions. Large capital buffers and strong financial institutions reduce the risk that banking crises will undermine confidence in the currency or the country's ability to sustain the peg.
Moreover, a robust banking sector can effectively manage the increased foreign exchange risk associated with supporting a fixed exchange rate. Banks play a critical role in currency interventions by supplying or absorbing foreign currency. If banks are poorly capitalized, they are more vulnerable to insolvency during foreign exchange interventions, which can destabilize the currency peg and threaten macroeconomic stability. A sound banking system enhances resilience, encourages investor confidence, and helps maintain the credibility of the fixed exchange rate.
Inflation tends to be higher than money growth in countries experiencing high inflation because of factors like adaptive inflation expectations, rising costs, supply shocks, and the velocity of money. When inflation is high, inflation expectations often become entrenched, leading individuals and firms to demand higher wages and prices, which perpetuates inflation beyond levels justified solely by increases in the money supply. Additionally, high inflation environments can cause the velocity of money (the rate at which money circulates in the economy) to increase, further fueling inflation independently of money supply growth.
Conversely, in low-inflation countries, inflation tends to be lower than money growth because of anchored inflation expectations, credible monetary policy, and relatively stable economic conditions. Central banks in low-inflation countries often implement policies aimed at anchoring expectations, which contain inflation despite increased money supply. When expectations are well-anchored, the velocity of money tends to be stable, and the relationship between money growth and inflation is more direct, resulting in inflation rates that are typically lower than the growth rate of the money supply.
The impact of financial innovations—such as the development of electronic banking, payment systems, derivatives, and integrated financial markets—has significantly altered the demand for money and the velocity of money. These innovations have generally increased the efficiency of transactions, reducing the need for holding large cash balances and enabling faster transfer of funds. As a result, the demand for traditional forms of money has declined in some contexts.
Financial innovations have also contributed to an increase in the velocity of money by enabling real-time transactions and reducing transaction costs. Enhanced payment systems, for example, facilitate quicker settlement, meaning money circulates more rapidly in the economy, which can influence inflation dynamics and monetary policy effectiveness. On the other hand, innovations that improve credit availability can increase the use of credit rather than cash, further decreasing demand for physical money but increasing overall economic activity.
Overall, advances in financial technology have led to more dynamic and complex interactions between money demand, velocity, and economic performance, necessitating continuous adaptation of monetary policy frameworks to maintain stability and control inflation effectively.
References
- Blanchard, O. (2017). Macroeconomics (7th ed.). Pearson.
- Borio, C. (2004). Market liquidity and banking stability: a reform agenda. International Center for Monetary and Banking Studies.
- Cecchetti, S. G., & Schoenholtz, K. L. (2017). Money, Banking, and Financial Markets (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
- Friedman, M. (1956). The Quantity Theory of Money—A Restatement. In Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Gürkaynak, R. S., et al. (2007). The Role of Interest Rates in the Conduct of Monetary Policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54(5), 1247-1265.
- Jonung, L., & Larch, M. (2009). The history of and outlook for the euro: a review of the literature. Economic Policy, 24(59), 519-572.
- King, R. G., & Wolman, A. L. (2004). Monopolistic Competition, Increasing Returns, and the Assessment of Exchange Rate Policies. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 28(8), 1353-1375.
- Taylor, J. B. (1993). Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 39, 195-214.
- Tobin, J. (1965). Money and Economic Growth. Econometrica, 33(4), 671-684.
- Woodford, M. (2003). Interest and prices: Foundations of a theory of monetary policy. Princeton University Press.