Goal To Conduct An Assessment Of Health Promotion While Appl

Goalto Conduct An Assessment Of Health Promotion While Applying The N

Complete a comprehensive history and physical examination. What physical findings are you looking for to help determine a presumptive nursing diagnosis? Support your findings with peer reviewed articles. Presentation is original work and logically organized in current APA style. Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Power point presentation with 8 -10 slides, excluding the tile slide and the reference slide. The presentation is clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, APA and misspelling. Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.

Paper For Above instruction

Assessment of health promotion in patients presenting with neurological symptoms such as vision loss requires a systematic approach that combines detailed history-taking with thorough physical examination. For Jessica, a 32-year-old woman experiencing sudden unilateral vision loss, identifying physical findings through systematic assessment can help formulate a presumptive nursing diagnosis and guide urgent management. The physical examination should focus on neurological, ocular, and systemic signs that point toward specific etiologies.

History taking is essential to identify temporal patterns, associated symptoms, lifestyle factors, and potential risk factors. It is critical to explore any recent infections, autoimmune conditions, medication use, or exposure to chemicals that could contribute to her current presentation. The patient’s prior episode of blurred vision suggests a possible recurrent or progressive neurological or ocular pathology, warranting a detailed assessment of past medical history.

Physical examination components should include neurological assessment, ocular evaluation, and general systemic examination. Key findings to look for include:

  • Pupil examination: Diminished light response in the affected eye suggests afferent pupillary defect (APD), indicating optic nerve involvement. The presence of a relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) is a hallmark sign that warrants further neurological investigation (Fletcher et al., 2019).
  • Optic disc and ocular structures: Swollen optic disc signifies papillitis or optic neuritis, which is an inflammatory demyelinating process often associated with multiple sclerosis. Checking for afferent pupillary defect and disc swelling provides clues to such diagnoses (Kalkbauer et al., 2020).
  • Eye movement assessment: Pain with eye movement and nystagmus suggest involvement of ocular motor nerves or central nervous system pathways. The presence of horizontal nystagmus indicates potential cerebellar or brainstem involvement, which requires further neurological evaluation.
  • Visual field assessment: Unable to assess visual fields in her left eye, but the findings of visual acuity reduction and visual field deficits in the affected eye can help localize whether lesions are anterior or posterior to the optic chiasm (Tamhankar et al., 2022).
  • Neurological exam: Tests for cranial nerve function, motor strength, coordination, sensation, and reflexes are necessary. Intact cranial nerves I-XII with nystagmus suggests localized brainstem or cerebellar pathology (Sander et al., 2021).>

Further considerations involve looking for signs of systemic illness, such as fever, malaise, or other neurological deficits, which can point toward infectious or autoimmune etiologies. The differential diagnoses for her presentation include optic neuritis, multiple sclerosis, ischemic optic neuropathy, or other demyelinating or inflammatory processes (Rojas et al., 2019).

The physical findings that support a presumptive nursing diagnosis of ‘‘risk for injury related to impaired vision secondary to optic neuritis’’ include decreased visual acuity, optic disc swelling, RAPD, and nystagmus. Early recognition of these signs is vital for prompt intervention. Additionally, identifying signs of increased intracranial pressure, such as papilledema or headache, is crucial since it can indicate underlying intracranial pathology requiring urgent management.

Incorporating evidence-based research, studies emphasize the importance of early detection and intervention in neuro-ophthalmic conditions. For example, consistent findings of papillitis and RAPD in optic neuritis patients underline the prognosis and treatment approach (Hickman et al., 2021). Moreover, recent research underscores the role of neuroimaging, such as MRI, to confirm the diagnosis and exclude other intracranial causes such as tumors or demyelinating lesions (Lee et al., 2022).

In conclusion, a comprehensive physical examination focusing on neurological and ocular assessments is critical to identifying key signs that guide nursing diagnoses and subsequent interventions. Recognizing features such as RAPD, optic disc swelling, and abnormal eye movements aligns with current evidence for diagnosing optic neuritis and related neurological conditions. Prompt identification allows early referral for medical management, including corticosteroids and further neuroimaging, improving patient outcomes and preventing permanent vision loss.

References

  • Fletcher, M., Henry, R., & Ford, L. (2019). Pupillary reflex assessment in neuro-ophthalmology: Diagnostic significance. Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology, 39(2), 144-151.
  • Kalkbauer, J., Rist, P., & Wernicke, R. (2020). Imaging findings in optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Journal, 26(13), 1612-1620.
  • Tamhankar, M. A., Singh, J., & Prasad, S. (2022). Visual field testing in optic pathway lesions: Clinical importance and techniques. Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging Retina, 53(3), 179-186.
  • Sander, H., Ludwig, K., & Krause, A. (2021). Differential diagnosis of nystagmus and ocular motility disorders. European Journal of Neurology, 28(3), 650-657.
  • Rojas, R., Steele, S. U., & Galetta, S. L. (2019). Neurological evaluation in optic neuritis. Current Opinion in Neurology, 32(1), 31-37.
  • Hickman, S., Green, A., & Harrison, H. (2021). Advances in diagnosis and management of optic neuritis. Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology, 41(4), 355-363.
  • Lee, S., Ji, Y., & Kim, J. (2022). MRI characteristics of demyelinating lesions in optic neuritis. Radiology, 304(1), 206-216.

Related Assignments