Good Will In Price Bidding Sometimes A Bidder On A Work Cont

Good Will In Price Biddingsometimes A Bidder On A Work Contract May B

Goodwill in price bidding is a strategic concept where a bidder offers a lower bid than what would maximize immediate profit, primarily to foster a favorable relationship, increase the likelihood of future business, and build a positive reputation with the buyer. Valuing the goodwill gained from such a bid involves assessing the potential future benefits and increased opportunities stemming from this relationship.

One method to quantify goodwill is through discounted cash flow models, where the expected future revenue streams attributable to the relationships forged are estimated and then discounted to present value. Another approach involves subjective valuation, where the bidder estimates the probability of securing future contracts based on the current bid and assigns a monetary value to these prospective gains. It is also common to consider the cost of acquiring new business through other means, comparing it to the benefits obtained via goodwill creation.

For example, if I were a contractor bidding on a project for a government or large corporation, I might consciously bid lower than my profit-maximizing price to secure the contract. Doing so could lead to multiple new opportunities with the client, future repeat projects, or even referrals, which collectively might outweigh the short-term loss. The expected value of this goodwill hinges on the credibility of my relationship with the client and the market environment.

In my experience, building goodwill has been essential, especially in industries with long-term relationships. When I bid lower initially, I expect to leverage this trust to earn future contracts at higher margins. However, this depends heavily on my ability to recover costs and ensure the lower bid does not erode overall profitability. Thus, I would be prepared to bid slightly below the profit-maximizing point if the expected long-term benefits, quantified through future business prospects and reputation, justify the initial sacrifice.

References

• Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand. The Free Press.
• Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
• Bond, F. W., & Karoly, P. (2005). The Engineering of Self-Change. In Self-Change and Therapy (pp. 141-167). Springer.
• Grewal, D., & Levy, M. (2007). Marketing. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-22.
• Pfeffer, J. (1994). Competitive advantage through people. Harvard Business Review, 72(4), 114-124.
• Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage. Free Press.
• Reichheld, F. F., & Sasser Jr, W. E. (1990). Zero Defections: Quality Comes to Services. Harvard Business Review, 68(5), 105-111.
• Schlesinger, L. A., & Heskett, J. L. (1991). Breakdowns in Service Recovery. Journal of Service Research, 14(4), 370-390.
• Ulwick, A. W. (2002). Turn Customer Input into Innovation. Harvard Business Review, 80(7), 91-97.

Paper For Above instruction

Goodwill in price bidding represents a strategic maneuver utilized by contractors and service providers to foster ongoing business relationships and enhance future revenue streams. This approach involves deliberately submitting a bid lower than the profit-maximizing amount, with the objective of securing the contract and establishing a positive reputation with the client. The valuation of such goodwill is inherently linked to the anticipated benefits that stem from the relationship rather than immediate financial gain. Quantifying this goodwill requires a comprehensive analysis of future opportunities, client loyalty, and the probability of repeat business, often employing discounted cash flow techniques or subjective estimations based on market intelligence.

The strategic rationale for bidding below profit-maximizing levels hinges on the premise that the long-term gains from securing continuous work outweigh the short-term financial sacrifice. For instance, consider a construction contractor bidding on a municipal project. By offering a slightly lower bid, the contractor not only increases the likelihood of winning the current contract but also paves the way for future projects due to positive reputation and trust established with the client. The value of this goodwill can be inferred from the expected number of future contracts, their durations, and the incremental profits derived from them, discounted to account for present value and associated risks.

From a practical perspective, I have observed that fostering goodwill through strategic bidding positively impacts long-term business prospects. In my own experience, vendors who demonstrate a willingness to build trust and prioritize relationship-building often enjoy a steady pipeline of repeat work and referrals, which can compensate for initial lower margins. Nonetheless, the decision to bid below the profit-maximizing point must be balanced carefully; clear estimates of future contract probabilities, market conditions, and the company's financial health are vital to avoid eroding overall profitability. This underscores the importance of robust relationship management and accurate forecasting when employing goodwill-based bidding strategies.

In conclusion, valuing the goodwill obtained from bidding lower requires an integration of quantitative models and qualitative judgments. By estimating the incremental future revenue streams attributable to the relationship, and discounting these to their present value, firms can gauge whether such strategic bids are financially justified. When executed judiciously, goodwill in price bidding becomes a powerful tool for securing long-term advantages in competitive markets, emphasizing the importance of strategic relationship management over short-term profit maximization alone.