Health Services Provided By The Government Sector In The Kin

Ealth Services Provided By The Government Sectorin The Kingdom Of Sau

Ealth services provided by the government sector in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia are mostly free and account for over 80% of total services. Thanks to the government policy of providing the highest possible quality care to citizens and the significant investment in resources, residents in the Kingdom are able to receive all levels of health services with relative ease. There is very minimal control of utilization across all sectors, which has led to abuse and overutilization in the public sector. The referral system adopted by the Ministry of Health (MOH) has reduced the issue of multiple visits and related abuse; however, it is not an effective cost-control tool. Once a referral is made, there are no regulations regarding the number of visits or level of care provided. Patients often request or demand referrals to higher-level facilities, and there are no strict guidelines governing these referrals.

The availability of highly specialized and expensive medical equipment in most Saudi hospitals encourages the use of advanced procedures for minor problems, often driven by healthcare professionals and patient preference. Public sector healthcare providers are compensated through a salary system, which offers little to no financial incentives to control costs. Healthcare professionals in the public sector do not bear the financial risks associated with resource mismanagement, which further diminishes cost-conscious behavior. While high-quality care is maintained in health facilities across the Kingdom, the minimal control over resource utilization results in inefficiencies and wastage, raising questions about the overall value for money invested in healthcare.

The implementation of managed care programs has proven beneficial elsewhere in reducing unnecessary hospitalizations and medical procedures. For example, Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) in the United States serve as a leading model. They effectively limit unnecessary inpatient admissions and ancillary services by utilizing a prepaid, capitated payment system—meaning providers receive a fixed amount per enrollee during a specified period regardless of services used. Such systems promote efficiency, cost savings, and preventive care, often reducing overall healthcare expenditure by 20-40% compared to traditional fee-for-service models (Luft, 1987; Manning & Newhouse, 1984).

In Saudi Arabia, a shift towards a managed care approach could significantly improve resource utilization and cost control. The current fee-for-service reimbursement benefits providers' income but encourages excess utilization, often for marginal benefits. Transitioning to a capitated payment model would incentivize providers to deliver necessary, efficient medical services while avoiding unnecessary procedures. Implementing similar models—such as HMOs, Staff Model, Group Model, or Preferred Provider Organizations (PPOs)—could be adapted to the Saudi context by focusing on workload management, cost containment, and quality assessment.

The HMO model emphasizes voluntary enrollment, contractual responsibility, and financial risk-sharing, which motivates providers to deliver appropriate care efficiently. Studies indicate that patients enrolled under prepaid systems—such as HMOs and managed care organizations—are hospitalized substantially less often, by 15-40%, than those under fee-for-service plans (Frank & Welch, 1985; McLaughlin, 1987). These models restrict unnecessary use of high-cost services, promote outpatient care, and encourage preventive health measures. Such benefits are vital for Saudi Arabia, with its increasing healthcare demands and high resource availability.

Key features of managed care strategies—like prior authorization for referrals, outpatient and same-day surgeries, utilization reviews, case management, and generic drug use—are effective cost-containment tools. Applying these tools systematically within the public and private healthcare sectors could curb excessive spending and improve service quality. The Saudi healthcare system has already adopted some elements of these strategies—such as the use of negotiated discounts and selective contracting—highlighting a readiness to shift towards a more managed care-oriented system.

While adopting managed care principles, it is essential to customize models fitting the unique needs of Saudi healthcare infrastructure. For example, expanding the use of capitation and utilization management techniques across hospitals and clinics can promote responsible resource use. Moreover, integrating these strategies with existing policies that incentivize efficiency will enhance cost-effectiveness. This transition, however, requires careful planning, effective regulation, and stakeholder cooperation to balance cost-saving measures with maintaining high-quality care standards.

In conclusion, the Saudi healthcare system stands to benefit significantly from the integration of managed care principles. Moving away from traditional fee-for-service reimbursement towards capitation-based models with robust utilization management can reduce unnecessary expenditure while ensuring quality care. As the Kingdom progresses towards a sustainable healthcare future, adopting tailored managed care systems—such as HMOs and PPOs—would enhance the value derived from the substantial investment in health resources. The ongoing reforms should emphasize strategic incentives, quality assurance, and efficient resource utilization, making healthcare more equitable, affordable, and effective for all residents.

References

• Feldstein, P. J. (1986). Health Care Economics. Wiley & Sons.
• Kovner, A. R. (1990). Health Care Delivery in the United States. Springer Publishing.
• Luft, H. S. (1987). How do HMOs achieve their savings? New England Journal of Medicine, 317(3), 173–174.
• Manning, W. G., & Newhouse, J. P. (1984). A controlled trial of the effects of prepaid group practice on use of services. New England Journal of Medicine, 310(1), 23–30.
• McLaughlin, C. G. (1987). HMO growth and hospital expenses and use: A simultaneous-equation approach. Health Services Research, 22(4), 413–430.
• Frank, R. G., & Welch, W. P. (1985). The competitive effects of HMOs: A review of evidence. Inquiry, 22(1), 67–82.
• Umeh, J. C. (1996). The Prescription for Health Cost-Control: Increase Dose of Cost Consciousness in Saudi Public Sector Physicians. Saudi Medical Journal, 17.
• Feldstein, P. J. (2005). Health care economics(3rd ed.). Wiley & Sons.
• Kovner, A. R. (1990). Health care delivery in the United States. Springer Publishing.
• Umeh, J. C. (1996). The prescription for health cost-control. Saudi Medical Journal, 17, 1-2.