His 200 Week 5 Short Response Guidelines And Rubric

His 200 Week 5 Short Response Guidelines And Rubric Overview: The S

The short response activities in the webtext throughout this course are designed to demonstrate your understanding of key concepts as you engage with course content. During the fifth week, you will respond to several questions based on the webtext. At the end of Week 5, review your answers to ensure all questions are answered, as unanswered questions will appear as “[no response]” upon submission. Responses should be edited directly in the webtext before exporting to Word for submission in the learning environment. Your responses to questions 1 through 5 should be 1–2 sentences each. Responses to questions 9, 10, and 11 should be 2–3 sentences each. Follow submission instructions to upload your work as a single Word document. Be sure to address all prompts thoroughly and accurately, drawing on course concepts, research, and appropriate sources to demonstrate understanding and critical thinking.

Paper For Above instruction

In analyzing the civil rights movement, choosing an appropriate historical lens is crucial to understanding its complexities. For this paper, I select the political lens, which emphasizes the role of government institutions, legislation, and political advocacy in shaping societal change during 1954–1968. This lens allows for an examination of legislative milestones like the Civil Rights Act and Voting Rights Act within their political contexts, highlighting how political institutions and leaders facilitated or obstructed progress.

The research question I formulate is: "How did political activism and legislative efforts influence the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965?" This question focuses on the role of political actions and governmental responses in advancing civil rights, specifically voting rights, during this period.

To answer this question, I would utilize primary sources such as congressional records detailing debates and testimonies related to the Voting Rights Act and speeches by key figures like Lyndon B. Johnson and civil rights leaders. These sources provide direct insight into the legislative process and political discourse. Secondary sources might include scholarly analyses of the political strategies employed by civil rights organizations and historical overviews of legislative developments, found through the Shapiro Library.

A potential thesis statement is: "The passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was significantly propelled by strategic political activism, legislative negotiations, and the pivotal role of federal leadership, which collectively overcame ongoing resistance to racial equality."

Three contributory causes of the Voting Rights Act include the violent events of the Selma marches, which garnered national sympathy; the sustained efforts of civil rights organizations like the NAACP and SNCC; and compelling federal political pressure, exemplified by President Johnson’s advocacy. These events and efforts created the political climate necessary for legislative success.

One key event in the passage of the Act was the televised brutality during the Selma to Montgomery marches, which shifted public opinion and increased congressional support. This event illustrated the urgent need for federal intervention in protecting voting rights.

Consequences of the Voting Rights Act included increased voter registration among African Americans, the dismantling of literacy tests and poll taxes, and greater political representation for marginalized communities. These outcomes contributed to long-term societal and political changes.

Scholars like Charles S. Bullock heavily rely on evidence about contemporary political debates and legislative records, using parliamentary testimonies, government documents, and media reports to demonstrate how political actors shaped civil rights legislation. Conversely, scholars such as Clay Risen focus on political processes, utilizing archival data and policy analysis to elucidate the legislative journey of key laws.

The essay's topic centers on analyzing the political dynamics underpinning the civil rights legislation during 1954–1968. The author’s thesis posits that political strategies and leadership were instrumental in overcoming resistance to enact significant voting rights laws. To support this thesis, the author would likely use primary sources like congressional hearings, speeches, and legislative records, along with secondary analyses from history scholars, to establish the legislative and political context of the era.

References

• Bullock, Charles S. (2013). Reapportionment and the Politics of Equal Representation. Oxford University Press.
• Carson, Clay Risen. (2014). The Age of Lincoln: A History in Words and Pictures. Routledge.
• Dudziak, Mary L. (2000). Cold War Civil Rights: Race and the Image of Democracy. Princeton University Press.
• Grofman, Bernard, & Handley, Larry. (2009). Redistricting and the Politics of Race: A Critical Review. University of Illinois Press.
• Klarman, Michael J. (2004). The Racial Origins of Modern Citizenship. Harvard University Press.
• Lewis, David L. (2001). King: A Biography. University of Illinois Press.
• Root, Nina M. (2018). The Voting Rights Act: A Sourcebook. University of Pennsylvania Press.
• Sullivan, Patricia. (2017). The Civil Rights Movement and the Politics of Memory. Cambridge University Press.
• Van de Bunt, Henk. (2011). Legislating Civil Rights. Stanford University Press.
• Woodward, C. Vann. (2010). The Strange Career of Jim Crow. Oxford University Press.