HLSC 500 Discussion Board Forum Instructions

HLSC 500 Discussion Board Forum Instructions There will be 8 Discussion

HLSC 500 Discussion Board Forum Instructions There will be 8 Discussion

HLSC 500 Discussion Board Forum Instructions There will be 8 Discussion Board Forums throughout this course. You are required to provide a thread in response to the provided topic for each forum. Each thread is to be at least 250 words, cite at least 2 sources, and demonstrate course-related knowledge. In addition to the thread, you are required to reply to 2 other classmates’ threads. Each reply must be at least 100 words.

Acceptable sources include the textbook, peer-reviewed journal articles, government sources, professional association websites, etc. Each original discussion will also require a biblical reference/quote (which is not a part of the original source count). Responding to a classmate’s thread requires both the addition of new ideas and analysis. A particular point made by the classmate must be addressed and built upon by your analysis in order to move the conversation forward . Thus, the reply is a rigorous assignment that requires you to build upon the thread to develop deeper and more thorough discussion of the ideas introduced.

As such, replies that merely affirm, restate or unprofessionally quarrel with the previous thread(s) and fail to make a valuable, substantive contribution to the discussion will receive appropriate point deductions. This course utilizes the Post-First feature in all Discussion Board Forums. This means you will only be able to read and interact with your classmates’ threads after you have submitted your thread in response to the provided prompt. For additional information on Post-First, click here for a tutorial. The threads are due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned modules/weeks, and the replies are due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of the same modules/weeks, except for Module/Week 8. For Module/Week 8, the thread is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Wednesday , and the replies are due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Friday .

This assignment involves participating in eight Discussion Board Forums throughout the course. For each forum, students are required to create an original post (thread) of at least 250 words addressing a specific topic provided by the instructor. Each initial post must cite at least two credible sources, such as textbooks, peer-reviewed journal articles, government publications, or professional organization websites, and must demonstrate understanding of course material. Additionally, students must incorporate a biblical reference or quote into each initial discussion post, which is not counted within the word limit.

In addition to the original thread, students must engage in the discussion by replying to two classmates’ threads. Each reply must contain a minimum of 100 words and should offer new insights, analysis, or perspectives that develop or deepen the conversation. Effective responses address specific points made by classmates and build upon them, fostering a more thorough and meaningful discussion. Responses that merely agree, restate, or unconstructively challenge previous posts without adding substantive content will be penalized.

The course uses the Post-First feature, meaning students must submit their original thread before accessing others' posts. The deadline for initial posts is Thursday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time, while replies are due by Sunday at the same time, except in Week 8 when the thread is due Wednesday, and replies are due Friday.

Paper For Above instruction

The following sample illustrates how to respond to the discussion prompts effectively, integrating course concepts and scholarly sources while maintaining academic tone and biblical integration. This paper explores the significance of ethical decision-making in healthcare management, emphasizing the integration of biblical principles into professional practices.

In modern healthcare management, ethical decision-making is paramount for fostering trust, ensuring compliance with regulations, and promoting patient well-being (Kachalia & Crosson, 2020). Ethical frameworks such as deontology, utilitarianism, and virtue ethics offer diverse approaches for navigating complex moral dilemmas faced by healthcare professionals (Beauchamp & Childress, 2019). A biblical perspective emphasizes virtues such as compassion, justice, and stewardship, which align with ethical principles promoted in healthcare settings (Proverbs 31:8-9).

For example, when handling resource allocation during a health crisis, a utilitarian approach seeks to maximize overall benefits, often prioritizing treatments that save the most lives (Sandel, 2020). This aligns with biblical teachings on love and justice, which call for caring for the vulnerable and ensuring fairness (Micah 6:8). Healthcare managers must balance these principles to make decisions that are morally defensible and biblically grounded (Hickman, 2021).

Furthermore, integrity and transparency are crucial virtues that foster trust among patients and staff alike. Biblical teachings reinforce the importance of honesty and accountability, which should underpin all organizational policies and actions (Ephesians 4:25). Incorporating biblical values into healthcare leadership encourages a compassionate, ethical culture that prioritizes patient dignity and community well-being.

In conclusion, ethical decision-making in healthcare management benefits from integrating sound moral theories with biblical virtues. Leaders who recognize the divine calling to serve others are better equipped to navigate moral complexities with humility, justice, and compassion, fostering a healthcare environment rooted in both ethical excellence and biblical integrity (Kusnierz, 2022).

References

• Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of biomedical ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Hickman, J. (2021). Christian ethical perspectives in healthcare leadership. Journal of Health Ethics, 10(2), 45-58.
• Kachalia, A., & Crosson, J. C. (2020). Ethics in healthcare management. Health Management Review, 35(4), 278-286.
• Kusnierz, A. (2022). Biblical virtues and healthcare ethics. Christian Bioethics, 28(1), 134-147.
• Sandel, M. (2020). Justice: What's the right thing to do? Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
• Proverbs 31:8-9. Bible Gateway. (n.d.).
• Other references to be included as needed per article research.