Homework Assignment 4 Due In Week 6 And Worth 30 Points

h1>Homework Assignment 4 Due in Week 6 and worth 30 points The data in below table lists country code and the order to remittance (OTR) time for hardware / software installations for the last 76 installations (from first to last). OTR is the time it takes from an order being placed until the system is installed and we receive payment (remittance). Because this company does business internationally, it also notes the country of installation using a country code. This code is listed in the first column. Table: Country Code and OTR Cycle Time for Software Systems Installation THE TABLE IS ATTACHED Use the date in table above and answer the following questions in the space provided below: 1. Does the OTR time appear to be stable? Why or why not? 2. If you were to use a control chart to evaluate stability, which chart would you use? Why? 3. What can you learn about the distribution of the installation process? 4. Does it appear that the country has an impact on installation time? Why or why not? Type your answers below and submit this file in Week 6 of the online course shell:

Based on the provided dataset of 76 international hardware and software installation remittance times (OTR), an initial step is to examine the stability of the process. To assess whether the OTR time appears to be stable, we need to analyze the pattern of data points over time. A process is considered stable if it exhibits consistency without discernible trends or unpredictable variations. If the OTR times fluctuate within predictable limits and no systematic upward or downward trend exists over the sequence of installations, then the process is likely stable. On the other hand, if the data shows a persistent trend, cyclical pattern, or significant variability beyond expected limits, it indicates instability, possibly due to external influences or process issues. Visual inspection of the control charts, such as plotting individual OTR times over the sequence, often reveals whether the process remains in control, with points randomly scattered within control limits, or if there are signs of out-of-control conditions.

If a control chart were to be used for this purpose, the appropriate choice would be an Individual (X-mR) Chart or an X-bar and R chart, depending on the data's aggregation level. Since the data comprises individual installation times over a sequence of events, an Individual control chart is most suitable. The reason for this is that it allows us to monitor the process for shifts or trends over time, detecting special causes that may influence the stability of installation times. An X-bar and R chart are typically suitable if multiple observations are grouped into subgroups, which does not appear to be the case here based on the description. Thus, a Shewhart Individual control chart would be the best choice for evaluating the stability of the OTR process over the 76 installations.

Regarding the distribution of the installation process, examining the data's shape and spread provides insights into its nature. If the data points are symmetrically distributed around the center with no extreme skewness or outliers, it suggests a normal distribution. The presence of outliers or skewness might indicate non-normality, possibly due to factors such as varying country practices, technical issues, or logistical differences. Additionally, calculating descriptive statistics such as the mean, median, and standard deviation, along with histogram plots, can reveal the distribution characteristics. If the data appears bell-shaped and symmetric, a normal distribution assumption might be appropriate, facilitating the use of certain statistical analyses and process capability assessments.

Investigating whether the country impacts installation time involves comparing OTR times across different country codes. If certain countries consistently exhibit longer or shorter times, this suggests that country-specific factors influence the process. Statistical analyses, such as hypothesis testing or analysis of variance (ANOVA), can be employed to determine if observed differences are statistically significant. Visual methods like boxplots grouped by country provide a straightforward way to compare distributions. If the analysis indicates significant differences, it would imply that country-related variables, such as logistical support, local regulations, or cultural practices, impact the installation cycle time. Understanding these differences can help target specific improvements or localized process adjustments.

References

  • Montgomery, D. C. (2019). Introduction to Statistical Quality Control (8th Edition). Wiley.
  • Ross, P. J. (2010). Taguchi Techniques for Quality Engineering. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Goetsch, D. L., & Davis, S. B. (2014). Quality Management for Organizational Excellence. Pearson.
  • Ryan, T. P. (2011). Modern Engineering Statistics. Wiley.
  • Burr, W. R. (2011). Statistical Methods for Quality Improvement. Wiley.
  • Kumar, S. (2017). Statistical Process Control and Quality Management. Springer.
  • Barlow, R. E., & Proschan, F. (1996). Statistical Theory of Reliability and Life Testing. SIAM.
  • Nelson, W. (1982). Accelerated Testing: Statistical Models, Test Plans, and Data Analyses. Wiley.
  • Duncan, A. J. (1986). Quality Control and Industrial Statistics. Irwin.
  • Shewhart, W. A. (1931). Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product. Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Related Assignments