Homework Turn-In: Sections For Collaboration

Homework Turn in to sections you may collaborate in this case write

HOMEWORK Turn in to sections. You may collaborate—in this case, write the names of all the collaborators on a single copy of the assignment to turn into your TA. Each person should also bring in a copy to refer to during sections. Be aware that you are responsible for independently knowing the material for quizzes and the final exam.

I. Write a phonetic description for the bolded consonants in the following words. Include voicing, place of articulation, manner of articulation.

Example: club—voiced bilabial stop

  1. cat
  2. dog
  3. fine
  4. tough
  5. space
  6. gold
  7. key
  8. mom
  9. know
  10. stop
  11. sister
  12. table
  13. van
  14. push
  15. thin
  16. then
  17. nice
  18. hand
  19. light
  20. butter

II. Write a phonetic description for the following English vowels and diphthongs written in IPA. Include height, frontness/backness, rounded/unrounded, tense/lax (when relevant).

For example: à¦-front, low, lax, unrounded

  1. i
  2. ʌ
  3. u
  4. ɪ
  5. ÊŠ
  6. e
  7. o
  8. É›
  9. É‘

III. For each of the following vowels and diphthongs write three words that include that sound. For example, oy—boy, join, Detroit

  1. i
  2. ʌ
  3. u
  4. ɪ
  5. ÊŠ
  6. e
  7. o
  8. É›
  9. a
  10. à¦
  11. ay
  12. aw

IV. Answer the following questions

  1. What is the difference between the vowel a and the diphthong aw?
  2. What is the difference between the vowel o and the diphthong oy?
  3. What is the difference between the vowel i and the diphthong ay?
  4. What does it mean when we say that the vowels i, e, o, u are diphthongal in California English?
  5. What does it mean when we say that the vowels i, e, o, u are monophthongal in many other varieties of English, for example Nigerian English? What is the difference between California o and Nigerian o in English?
  6. What does it mean to say that the diphthong ay is monophthongal in Southern English and African American English?

At the end, include references in HTML (for example, an

References

heading followed by a list of references).

Paper For Above instruction

This paper provides a comprehensive phonetic analysis of English consonants and vowels, explores the distinctions between various phonetic sounds, and discusses regional variations in phoneme realization. It aims to deepen understanding of phonetic features and their implications for dialectal differences.

Introduction

Phonetics is the study of speech sounds and their physical properties. It involves analyzing the articulation, acoustic characteristics, and auditory perception of speech sounds. This paper focuses on the description of consonants and vowels, using phonetic terminology to analyze specific examples provided in the assignment. Additionally, it compares regional variations in vowel pronunciation, especially between California English and Nigerian English, and discusses the phonological processes involved in these dialectal differences.

Phonetic Description of Consonants

The consonantal sounds analyzed are based on voicing, place, and manner of articulation. For instance, the word "cat" begins with the phonetic sound /k/, a voiceless velar plosive, produced by obstructing the airflow at the velar part of the mouth without voicing. Conversely, "mom" begins with /m/, a voiced bilabial nasal, produced by voicing with the airflow passing through the nasal cavity.

Similarly, "dog" begins with /d/, a voiced alveolar plosive, characterized by contact between the tongue and the alveolar ridge. "Fine" starts with /f/, a voiceless labiodental fricative, produced by forcing air through a narrow channel between the bottom lip and upper teeth. Each of the listed words has a corresponding phonetic transcription that details these articulatory features, such as the voicing (voiced or voiceless), place (bilabial, alveolar, velar, labiodental), and manner (stop, nasal, fricative).

For example, "key" begins with /k/ (voiceless velar stop), "know" with /n/ (voiced alveolar nasal), and "hand" with /h/ (voiceless glottal fricative). The analysis extends to fricatives like /θ/ in "thin" (voiceless dental fricative) and /ð/ in "then" (voiced dental fricative). The detailed phonetic descriptions help distinguish the subtle articulatory differences among English consonants and provide insights into regional pronunciations and phonological processes.

Phonetic Description of Vowels and Diphthongs

The vowels and diphthongs are described using features such as height (high, mid, low), frontness/backness (front, central, back), roundedness (rounded or unrounded), and tenseness/laxness. For example, /i/ (as in "see") is a high, front, unrounded, tense vowel, whereas /æ/ (as in "cat") is a low, front, unrounded, lax vowel. The distinction between tense and lax vowels is crucial in English phonology, influencing syllable structure and stress patterns.

The vowel /u/ (as in "goose") is characterized as a high, back, rounded, tense vowel. The diphthong /aɪ/ (as in "eye") involves a glide from a low front vowel /a/ to a near-high front position. Understanding these features enables accurate phonetic transcription and helps analyze regional accent differences, such as the articulation of the monophthongs in Californian English versus Nigerian English.

Words Containing Specific Vowels and Diphthongs

For each vowel and diphthong, three example words are provided to illustrate their usage in English speech patterns:

  • /i/: "see," "meet," "machine"
  • /æ/: "cat," "bad," "laugh"
  • /u/: "blue," "rule," "food"
  • /aɪ/: "boy," "ride," "light"
  • /aʊ/: "cow," "house," "mouth"
  • /e/: "bed," "said," "head"
  • /o/: "go," "hope," "stone"
  • /ɛ/: "pen," "said," "bread"
  • /ɑ/: "father," "palm," "hot"
  • /ɔ/: "law," "saw," "caught"
  • /aɪ/: "buy," "fly," "try"
  • /aʊ/: "how," "about," "now"

Analysis and Regional Variations in Vowel Pronunciation

The difference between vowels like /a/ and diphthongs like /aʊ/ lies in their phonological structure. The vowel /a/ is a monophthong, a single, steady vocal position, whereas /aʊ/ is a diphthong involving a glide from a low front to a back rounded position. For example, the word "cat" features /a/, whereas "cow" contains /aʊ/. The same distinction applies between /o/ and /ɔɪ/; /o/ as in "go" is a monophthong, while /ɔɪ/ as in "boy" involves a glide from a mid-back rounded position to a high front position.

In California English, vowels such as /i/ and /e/ are often diphthongal, meaning that they are articulated with a slight gliding movement, making the pure monophthongs less distinct. For instance, the /e/ vowel may have a slight glide towards /i/ during pronunciation, thus being characterized as diphthongal. Conversely, in Nigerian English, vowels like /i/ and /e/ tend to be monophthongal, produced with a steady articulatory position, resulting in a more 'pure' vowel sound. The California /o/ often exhibits a diphthongal quality, such as /oʊ/, whereas in Nigerian English, the same vowel is typically a static, monophthongal /o/. Such regional differences have implications for phonological processes like vocalic reduction and the perception of dialectal identity.

Finally, the diphthong /aɪ/ (as in "light") is monophthongal in Southern and African American English varieties, where the glide diminishes, producing a more monothongal sound, such as /aː/. The linguistic shift reflects regional phonological changes that influence vowel quality, rhythm, and intonation patterns characteristic of these dialects.

Conclusion

Understanding the articulatory features of consonants and vowels, including their phonetic descriptions and regional variations, provides valuable insights into the complexity and diversity of English pronunciation. The distinctions between monophthongs and diphthongs, as well as regional differences, are crucial for linguistic analysis, language teaching, and dialectal studies. Continued investigation into these features enriches our comprehension of phonological systems and supports more accurate pronunciation and transcription practices.

References

  • Ladefoged, P., & Johnson, K. (2014). A Course in Phonetics (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Abercrombie, D. (1996). Elements of General Phonetics. Edinburgh University Press.
  • Flege, J. E. (1995). Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues, 149-174.
  • Wells, J. C. (2000). Accents of English. Cambridge University Press.
  • Peter, S. (2001). The phonetics of Nigerian English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 31(2), 139-148.
  • Labov, W., Ash, S., & Boberg, C. (2006). The Atlas of North American English. Walter de Gruyter.
  • Roach, P. (2009). English Phonetics and Phonology: A Practical Course. Cambridge University Press.
  • Trudgill, P. (2004). New Dialect Formation: The Case of New Zealand English. Oxford University Press.
  • Gimson, A. C. (2014). An Introduction to the Pronunciation of English. Routledge.
  • Brown, G., & Yule, G. (2014). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge University Press.