How Can Bakers Motivate Employees And Gain Support For F

How can the Bakers motivate employees and gain support for future plans

Arrow Furniture, a family-owned high-end furniture manufacturer based in North Carolina, faces significant motivational challenges among its workforce, primarily due to external economic pressures and internal perceptions of job security and compensation. The industry’s decline, intensified by foreign competition, has led employees to exhibit counterproductive behaviors, including threats to unionize. The family ownership recognizes the need to enhance competitiveness through cost reductions and increased productivity while maintaining their commitment to employee welfare. This complex situation requires a strategic application of the 3-Step Problem-Solving Approach and the Organizing Framework to develop effective motivational strategies that foster employee support for the company’s future trajectory.

Introduction

Motivating employees within a declining industry context demands an understanding of intrinsic and extrinsic motivators, and how they interact with organizational goals. The Bakers must address the current morale issues, potential union activism, and impending competition from a new, better-paying, and technologically advanced manufacturing facility. Their goal is to inspire commitment and productivity while balancing organizational and employee needs.

Step 1: Diagnosing the Problem

The core problem at Arrow Furniture involves low employee motivation, driven by fears of job insecurity and perceived inadequacies in compensation compared to the upcoming competitor. The existing moderate hygiene factors and low motivators, as outlined in Herzberg’s two-factor theory, indicate that basic needs are being met but the employees lack higher-level motivators such as recognition, achievement, and growth opportunities (Herzberg, 1966). Additionally, Maslow's hierarchy of needs suggests that employees require not only economic stability but also a sense of belonging, esteem, and self-actualization.

The threat of unionization signals dissatisfaction and a lack of organizational trust, which can further diminish motivation. The company’s challenge is to elevate motivation without significantly increasing labor costs or compromising its competitive position.

Step 2: Generating Alternative Solutions

Several strategies emerge from organizational and motivational theories. Implementing recognition programs and providing opportunities for skill development align with Herzberg’s motivators and Maslow's esteem and self-actualization needs. Offering transparent communication about job security and involving employees in decision-making may enhance organizational trust. Additionally, intrapreneurship initiatives could promote innovation and ownership among employees, fostering intrinsic motivation.

Investing in training and career development not only prepares workers for the technologically advanced jobs in the new plant but also signals organizational commitment to their growth, aligning with McGregor's Theory Y, which assumes employees are motivated by meaningful work and self-development (McGregor, 1960). These approaches can increase engagement, reduce resistance, and diminish unionization threats.

Step 3: Selecting and Implementing the Best Solution

A synergistic approach combining recognition, development, and involvement strategies should be adopted. For instance, implementing a performance-based recognition system tied to skill advancement can motivate employees intrinsically while reinforcing desired behaviors. Regular communication through town halls and participative decision-making can rebuild trust and demonstrate organizational concern for employee well-being, aligning with self-determination theory that emphasizes autonomy, competence, and relatedness (Deci & Ryan, 1985).

Furthermore, finding ways to involve workers in continuous improvement initiatives—such as suggestions for process efficiencies—can foster a sense of ownership and purpose, thus motivating employees to actively contribute to the company’s turnaround. This inclusive approach helps balance cost reduction with motivation by emphasizing the value of employees' contributions.

Conclusion

The Bakers can leverage motivational theories to craft a comprehensive strategy that addresses current dissatisfaction and prepares their workforce for future challenges. Emphasizing intrinsic motivators such as recognition, skills development, and participation can strengthen trust, reduce union threats, and increase productivity. It is essential to communicate transparently, recognize contributions, and foster a culture of continuous improvement. This balanced approach aligns with the family’s values and enhances the organization’s capacity to adapt in a competitive environment, ensuring sustainability and employee support.

References

• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
• Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. World Publishing Company.
• McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. McGraw Hill.
• Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.
• Pink, D. H. (2009). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. Penguin.
• Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
• Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work. Wiley.
• Latham, G. P., & Pinder, C. C. (2005). Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty‐first century. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 485–516.
• Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. Wiley.
• Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362.