You Are A Manager Of Three Employees At Riordan Manuf 867373

You Are A Manager Of Three Employees At Riordan Manufacturing

You are a manager of three employees at Riordan Manufacturing. You recently had these employees take a series of self-assessments to aid you in managing them. Now that you have these assessments, you are now tasked with creating an Employee Portfolio for each of the employees to help guide you in developing ways to best manage them. Resources: Results of Self-Assessments, University of Phoenix Material: Employee Portfolio Management Plan Complete the Employee Portfolio: Management Plan found on your student website for each of the three employees. Be sure to include the point values and meanings for all assessments. How might these three employees’ characteristics affect the performance of the organization? Make recommendations for additional assessments from the Self-Assessment library. Submit the Employee Portfolio.

Paper For Above instruction

Effective management of employees within an organization necessitates a comprehensive understanding of their individual characteristics, motivations, strengths, and areas for development. The process of creating individual Employee Portfolios, which incorporate self-assessment results, serves as a strategic tool to optimize employee performance and, consequently, organizational success. This paper delineates the development of Employee Portfolios for three hypothetical employees at Riordan Manufacturing, exploring how their unique characteristics influence organizational performance. Additionally, it offers targeted recommendations for supplementary assessments to enhance understanding and management of these employees.

The first step in creating each Employee Portfolio involves analyzing the self-assessment results. These assessments provide valuable insights into employees’ personality traits, work styles, motivation levels, and skill sets. For each employee, it is crucial to include the assessment's point values and their corresponding meanings to facilitate an accurate interpretation of their profiles. For example, a high score in extraversion may indicate strong interpersonal skills and a propensity for teamwork, whereas lower scores could suggest a preference for independent work or introversion. Including such details allows managers to tailor management strategies to foster engagement and productivity.

The second step involves a detailed description of each employee’s characteristics based on their self-assessment outcomes. Consider Employee A, whose results show high openness to experience and strong conscientiousness. These traits suggest that Employee A is innovative, detail-oriented, and reliable, which can positively impact project management and quality assurance. Conversely, Employee B exhibits high extraversion but moderate emotional stability, indicating that they are outgoing and capable of effective communication but may require support in stress management. Employee C, with moderate scores across assessments, may represent a balanced but less specialized profile, requiring diverse management techniques to optimize performance.

The characteristics outlined in each Employee Portfolio influence organizational performance in various ways. Employees with high conscientiousness tend to deliver consistent, high-quality work, reduce errors, and meet deadlines, thereby enhancing overall productivity. Extraverted employees facilitate team collaboration and client interactions, fostering a positive work environment. Conversely, understanding areas where employees may struggle, such as stress management or adaptability, allows managers to implement targeted interventions. Such tailored approaches contribute to higher job satisfaction, retention, and organizational effectiveness.

In addition to the assessments used, it is advisable to incorporate supplementary evaluations from the Self-Assessment Library. For instance, cognitive ability tests can provide insights into problem-solving and learning capacity, essential for training and development. Emotional intelligence assessments can help identify employees’ self-awareness, empathy, and social skills, vital for leadership and teamwork. Conflict resolution and stress management evaluations can further enhance understanding of emotional resilience and interpersonal dynamics. These additional assessments enable a more holistic view of each employee’s capabilities and development needs.

Developing comprehensive Employee Portfolios also involves setting specific management strategies tailored to each employee’s profile. For example, for Employee A, providing challenging projects that stimulate their innovative tendencies and offering recognition for reliability can boost engagement. For Employee B, establishing clear communication channels and providing stress management resources may improve performance and well-being. For Employee C, integrating diverse responsibilities can leverage their balanced profile while supporting growth in less dominant areas.

Ultimately, the strategic use of employee self-assessment results through detailed portfolios empowers managers at Riordan Manufacturing to foster a more engaged, productive, and resilient workforce. By understanding individual differences and implementing targeted interventions, managers can significantly influence organizational performance. Continuous assessment and adjustment are vital, ensuring that employee development aligns with organizational goals, thus fostering sustained success.

References

• Golman, R. (2006). Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ. Bantam Books.
• Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalised self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 80-92.
• Robinson, L. (2018). The impact of personality traits on work performance. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 18(2), 45-59.
• Salgado, J. F. (1997). The Five-Factor Model of personality and job performance in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1), 30-43.
• Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262-274.
• Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44(4), 703-742.
• Wright, T. A., & Bonett, D. G. (2007). Job satisfaction and psychological well-being as nonclinical perspectives on employee health. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(2), 159-172.
• Zaccaro, S. J., & Banks, D. (2001). Personality and leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(2), 161-183.
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52(5), 509-516.
• Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26.