How I Would Handle The Situation As George Franklin

How I Would Handle the Situation as George Franklin

Dear Professor,

In the scenario faced by George Franklin, I believe transparency and integrity are paramount. If I were in his position, my foremost priority would be to ensure public safety and uphold ethical standards, even if it risks personal or professional repercussions. The discovery of significant radiation levels, even if below government standards, poses potential health risks and could impact residents' well-being and trust. Therefore, I would recommend reporting these findings to the relevant authorities immediately.

First, I would document all evidence and measurements obtained with the Geiger counter thoroughly. Transparency is essential; documenting helps establish an accurate record of facts and supports the decision to report. Second, I would escalate the issue to the appropriate regulatory agencies, such as environmental protection authorities or radiological health departments, so they can conduct further assessments. These agencies have the expertise and obligation to evaluate the risks, provide guidelines, and manage remediation if necessary.

While there are concerns about lawsuits and professional reputation, these issues cannot outweigh potential hazards to residents and future occupants. Concealing such information may lead to more severe legal consequences if health problems emerge later. Moreover, ethical standards and professional integrity demand honesty. As an environmental engineer committed to public safety, it is my responsibility to inform all stakeholders involved about potential risks, regardless of commercial or legal implications.

Furthermore, working collaboratively with the authorities can help develop a remediation plan to reduce radiation levels, possibly making the site safer for future use. This proactive approach aligns with environmental stewardship and builds public trust in the regulatory process. Ultimately, maintaining transparency and prioritizing safety over personal or corporate gain reflects the core principles of environmental engineering and accountability.

Thank you for considering my perspective on this critical issue.

Sincerely, [Your Name]

References

• Brunson, M. W., & Ahn, S. (2011). Environmental Impact Assessment: A Review of the Literature and Contemporary Practices. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(12), 1893–1903.
• Detta, B., & Cobb, S. (2018). Ethical Responsibilities of Environmental Engineers. Environmental Ethics, 40(3), 225–238.
• Gordon, R. G., & Ford, M. (2017). Risk Management and Communication in Environmental Engineering. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 143(4), 04016084.
• ISO 14001:2015 Environmental Management Systems — Requirements with Guidance for Use. (2015). International Organization for Standardization.
• National Research Council. (2008). Biosolids Applied to Land: Advancing Standards and Practices. The National Academies Press.
• Perkins, R., & Gill, S. E. (2015). Ethical Decision-Making in Environmental Engineering. Environmental Management, 55(2), 417–431.
• Silva, C., & Ferreira, P. (2020). Radiation Safety and Environmental Impact of Radioactive Waste. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 185(4), 429–436.
• Smith, L. A. (2019). Environmental Sampling and Data Interpretation. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, 54(5), 469–481.
• United Nations Environment Programme. (2012). Environmental Governance and Ethics. UNEP.
• Williams, P., & Taylor, R. (2016). Legal and Ethical Considerations in Environmental Assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 56, 102–110.