How Many Times Do Organizations Make Decisions Based On What

Many Times Organizations Will Make Decisions Based Upon What Other Org

Using the Argosy University online library resources and the Internet, research ways of making informed decisions. Respond to the following: Why do you think managers, or business decision makers, get caught up in following the crowd versus making decisions that are truly going to add value to the business? For example, some businesses may make decisions that drive only short-term gains at the cost of future growth. Can such a blind leap be a good thing for the business? Is it worth the risk?

How can managers ensure that they are not following a trend but instead doing what is truly best for the organization? Have you seen your organization make these mistakes? What were the mistakes? How could these mistakes have been avoided or improved upon? How do you think business can learn from the mistakes of others or business decision mistakes such as the dot-com era?

Paper For Above instruction

Organizational decision-making is a complex process influenced by various internal and external factors. One of the significant challenges managers face is the tendency to follow prevailing trends or mimic competitors, often leading to decisions that do not align with the company's core objectives or strategic vision. This phenomenon, often termed "herd behavior," can be attributed to various psychological biases, such as conformity bias and fear of missing out, as well as pressures from stakeholders seeking rapid results and competitive advantage.

Historically, the dot-com bubble of the late 1990s exemplifies the pitfalls of trend-driven decision-making. During this period, many companies invested heavily in online ventures without thoroughly assessing their viability, driven by the surge of internet enthusiasm and investors' hype. When the bubble burst in 2000, numerous firms faced bankruptcy, highlighting how short-term exuberance and following the crowd can lead to disastrous outcomes. Conversely, some businesses that refrained from succumbing to the trend and practiced due diligence maintained stability and even seized market opportunities later when conditions stabilized. This history underscores the importance of research and strategic thinking in decision-making.

Managers often fall into the trap of following trends because of the desire for quick wins, peer pressure, or the fear of becoming irrelevant. The allure of immediate gains can overshadow the need for comprehensive analysis of the long-term implications. For example, during the dot-com era, many businesses prioritized rapid online expansion over sustainable business models, leading to financial losses once the bubble burst. Such decisions are risky because they prioritize short-term performance at the expense of future growth and stability. Blindly following trends can result in resource wastage and damage to organizational reputation if the trend turns out to be a passing fad.

To avoid blindly following trends, managers should implement robust decision-making frameworks that emphasize data-driven analysis, risk management, and alignment with strategic goals. Techniques such as scenario planning, SWOT analysis, and stakeholder consultations can help evaluate the long-term implications rather than succumbing to market hype. Additionally, fostering a culture that encourages critical thinking and dissenting opinions can prevent groupthink and promote more thoughtful decision-making. Regular review of industry trends with a focus on empirical evidence rather than hype ensures decisions are based on what truly benefits the organization.

In my experience, some organizations make these mistakes by overinvesting in emerging technologies without adequate testing or understanding. For instance, companies may prematurely adopt a new social media platform to attract customers, only to find that the platform does not align with their target audience, resulting in wasted resources. Such mistakes could have been minimized through pilot testing, phased implementation, and continuous performance evaluation. Incorporating lessons from past experiences and industry failures can provide valuable insights that help prevent repeat errors.

Learning from history, especially from significant failures like the dot-com bubble, is essential for modern businesses. Case studies and post-mortem analyses of failed ventures reveal common pitfalls such as overleveraging, lack of due diligence, and emotional decision-making. Businesses that adopt a culture of continuous learning, adaptability, and strategic agility are better positioned to navigate volatile market conditions and avoid costly mistakes. Transparency in decision-making and active risk assessment further support long-term sustainability and resilience.

In conclusion, while following industry trends may offer short-term advantages, sustainable growth depends on informed, strategic decision-making rooted in thorough research and analysis. Managers must resist the impulse to follow the herd blindly and instead focus on aligning decisions with the organization’s core values and long-term vision. Learning from past mistakes like the dot-com bubble provides valuable lessons in risk assessment, strategic planning, and innovation management, vital for building resilient organizations capable of sustained success in an ever-evolving marketplace.

References

• Barberis, N., Shleifer, A., & Wurgler, J. (2005). Comovement. Journal of Financial Economics, 75(2), 283–317.
• George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (2012). Understanding and managing organizational behavior. Pearson.
• Hagerty, K. (2009). The rise and fall of the dot-com bubble. The Economist.
• Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76–84.
• Lintner, J. (1965). The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investment in stock portfolios. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(1), 13–37.
• MarketWatch. (2000). Lessons learned from the dot-com bubble burst. MarketWatch.com.
• Shiller, R. J. (2000). Irrational exuberance. Princeton University Press.
• Sornette, D. (2003). Why stock markets crash: Critical events in complex financial systems. Princeton University Press.
• Thaler, R. H. (1993). Advances in behavioral finance: Recent research and its implications. Financial Analysts Journal, 49(1), 12–23.
• Wang, Y., & Kannan, P. K. (2018). The impact of trend following in financial markets. Journal of Business Research, 86, 196–209.