How To Develop And Create A Domain Model: Primary List Of Ob

How To Develop And Create A Domain Model1 Primary List Of Objectsfac

Developing and creating a domain model involves identifying key objects within a system, eliminating redundant items, and organizing these objects into meaningful relationships such as aggregation and generalization. The primary goal is to establish a clear and efficient representation of system components, ensuring that the model accurately reflects system functionalities while removing unnecessary complexity. This process begins with listing potential objects like faculty, students, projects, classes, administrator, login, levels, departments, courses, rubrics, self-assessment, peer-assessment, feedback, reports, averages, team, individual, and comments.

Next, redundancies such as classes vs. courses, feedback vs. comments, and team vs. students are identified and eliminated to streamline the object list. After refining this list, the focus is on organizing objects that have an aggregation relationship, grouping classes that logically contain other objects to form the core of the domain model. For example, a class may aggregate students, projects, and assessments, but not necessarily feedback or comments directly.

Further, additional domain objects that were not explicitly specified in the initial requirements are identified through analysis. For instance, concepts like 'evaluation report,' 'assessment score,' or 'performance metrics' might emerge as meaningful objects to support system functionalities. This iterative process can lead to the creation of generalization relationships, where common features of objects like 'assessment' and 'feedback' are abstracted into higher-level classes, enhancing reusability and clarity within the model.

Additionally, understanding domain-specific concepts such as timed-out states (e.g., a process timeout in system assessments or feedback submissions) is essential. Although not explicitly mentioned in the context of PACU (post-anesthesia care unit), a timeout generally refers to a system-enforced period after which an ongoing process is halted or flagged, ensuring system responsiveness and security.

Paper For Above instruction

Developing a comprehensive domain model for a student peer evaluation system requires systematic identification, organization, and refinement of objects within the system's context. The objective is to establish a clear representation of all meaningful components and their relationships, facilitating system design, implementation, and future modifications. This involves initially creating a primary list of objects, eliminating redundancies, establishing relationships based on the nature of interactions among objects, discovering additional domain entities, and implementing generalization where appropriate.

Initially, the primary list of objects includes entities such as faculty, students, projects, classes, administrator, login, levels, departments, courses, rubrics, self-assessment, peer-assessment, feedback, reports, averages, team, individual, and comments. These objects are central to the system's function of managing group projects, peer evaluations, and feedback mechanisms. For example, faculty and administrator roles manage courses, classes, rubrics, and user data; students participate in assessments and view feedback; reports aggregate performance data, and comments facilitate qualitative feedback.

In the process of refining this list, it is crucial to eliminate duplicated or overlapping items. For example, distinguishing between 'classes' and 'courses' helps clarify whether a class is a specific offering of a course or a broader entity. Similarly, feedback and comments may sometimes serve overlapping functions; consolidating them helps simplify the model. Also, understanding that 'team' and 'students' are different entities—teams comprise students but may be treated as separate objects for organizational purposes—is important. Such distinctions prevent redundancy and support clear relationships.

Once the primary list is refined, the next step involves grouping objects that share an aggregation relationship to form the core structure of the domain model. For instance, a 'Class' entity could aggregate 'Students,' 'Projects,' and 'Assessments.' This reflects real-world relationships where a class contains multiple projects, each associated with students and their evaluations. The aggregation relationship indicates that the existence of 'Projects' and 'Students' depends logically on the class context, but they can also exist independently in other parts of the system.

Further, it is essential to identify additional domain objects that were not explicitly part of initial requirements but serve to enrich the model. For example, 'Evaluation Reports,' 'Score Sheets,' and 'Performance Metrics' might emerge from stakeholder discussions and system analysis as necessary for comprehensive evaluation recording and reporting. These new objects support detailed data tracking and facilitate analysis of student performance and team dynamics.

Implementing generalization relationships enhances the model's reusability and clarity. For example, 'Assessment' could be a generalized class with subclasses such as 'Self-assessment,' 'Peer-assessment,' and 'Instructor-assessment.' Each subclass inherits common features of 'Assessment' but also introduces specific attributes or behaviors relevant to each assessment type. Similarly, 'Feedback' and 'Comments' can be abstracted into a higher 'Evaluation' class, which encapsulates different forms of qualitative input.

Understanding system-specific concepts like 'timed-out' states is important even if not mentioned explicitly. A timeout typically indicates a system-enforced period after which an ongoing process, such as submitting or reviewing assessments, is halted. For example, if a student fails to complete a peer review within the allotted time, the system might automatically mark the assessment as incomplete or require admin intervention. Although 'timed out' states might not be directly discussed in PACU contexts, they are critical in online evaluation systems to maintain process efficiency and data integrity.

Overall, creating an effective domain model for a student peer evaluation system involves a thorough understanding of system requirements, careful object identification, elimination of redundancies, and establishing meaningful relationships through aggregation and generalization. Such a model ensures that the system is both comprehensive and flexible, supporting the diverse functionalities needed for effective peer assessment, feedback, reporting, and administration.

References

• Ambler, S. (2003). The Object Primer: Agile Model-Driven Development with UML 2.0. Cambridge University Press.
• Batra, S. (2012). System Analysis and Design: An Object-Oriented Approach with UML. Vikas Publishing House.
• Booch, G. (2006). Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with Applications. Addison-Wesley.
• Jacobson, I., Booch, G., & Rumbaugh, J. (1999). The Unified Software Development Process. Addison-Wesley.
• Larman, C. (2004). Applying UML and Patterns: An Introduction to Object-Oriented Analysis and Design and Iterative Development. Prentice Hall.
• Pressman, R. S. (2014). Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I., & Booch, G. (2004). The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual. Addison-Wesley.
• Sommerville, I. (2010). Software Engineering. Pearson.
• Stevens, P. (2001). UML for Systems Engineering. Addison-Wesley.
• Turner, R. (2010). Systems Analysis and Design. Pearson Education.