I Will Link The 3 Sources Needed For The Bibliography
I Will Link The 3 Sources Needed For The Bibliographythe Grading Rubri
I Will link the 3 sources needed for the bibliography The grading rubric for your annotated bibliography appears below. Submit an annotated bibliography by no later than Sunday of week 3. Late submissions of this assignment will not be accepted. Be sure that you collect a minimum of 3-4 peer-reviewed sources (published within the last 10 years) from the APUS online databases for the annotated bibliography. The annotated bibliography must be relevant to your 'working title' of your research proposal.
Please note that each annotation should be around 250 words to briefly synthesize the article. The annotation should not be excessive; nor overly brief. See the rubric. In addition, these three to four sources are not the only sources you will use in your proposal. They are a means for the professor to make sure you are on the right track, selecting the right kind of literature, and that you are able to compile an annotated bibliography.
The annotated bibliography will be included as an appendix in your final 'research proposal' that you submit in week 7. More info on annotated bibliographies may be found at: Annotated Bibliographies - Click Here Submit your work in APA 6th edition Style format. Sources to use are attached.
Paper For Above instruction
The assignment requires the creation of an annotated bibliography consisting of 3-4 peer-reviewed sources relevant to a specific research project. This task is designed to help students demonstrate their ability to identify and synthesize scholarly literature aligned with their research topic, serving as a foundation for a comprehensive research proposal.
The annotated bibliography is due by Sunday of week 3, emphasizing the importance of adhering to deadlines, as late submissions will not be accepted. The sources must be retrieved from the APUS online databases, ensuring they are reputable and current, with publication dates within the last ten years. This timeframe guarantees that the research is relevant and reflects recent developments in the field.
Each annotation should be approximately 250 words, providing a concise summary and synthesis of the article’s main points, methodology, findings, and relevance to the research project. The goal is to offer a brief but accurate overview that highlights how each source contributes to the overall understanding of the topic. Annotations that are overly brief or excessively detailed may not meet rubric standards; therefore, clarity and conciseness are crucial.
The selected sources serve an instructional purpose, guiding the researcher in refining their literature review and ensuring the appropriateness of their sources. These citations and annotations will be included as an appendix in the final research proposal, due in week 7. The annotated bibliography acts as a critical step in constructing a solid theoretical foundation, demonstrating scholarly effort, and aligning with academic standards.
Formatting must follow APA 6th edition guidelines, including proper citation style, indentation, and referencing. Attention to detail in formatting not only fulfills academic requirements but also enhances the professionalism of the submission. The sources to be used should be attached or linked to the assignment, and students are encouraged to consult additional resources regarding APA formatting and annotated bibliography construction for best practices.
In conducting this assignment, students enhance their ability to critically evaluate scholarly articles, synthesize complex information, and communicate findings effectively. These skills are essential for academic research and professional writing, laying the groundwork for a well-structured research proposal.
References
- American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Galvan, J. L. (2017). Writing literature reviews: A guide for students of the social and behavioral sciences (7th ed.). Routledge.
- Hart, C. (2018). Doing a literature review: Releasing the research imagination. Sage Publications.
- Rowley, J., & Slack, F. (2004). conducting a literature review. Management Research News, 27(6), 31-39.
- Ridley, D. (2012). The literature review: A step-by-step guide for students. Sage Publications.
- Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2008). The craft of research (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
- Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in doctoral educational research. Educational Researcher, 34(6), 3-15.
- Hart, C. (2001). Doing a literature review. SAGE Publications.
- Hart, C. (2018). Doing a literature review: Releasing the research imagination. Sage Publications.