Identify A Gap Or Gaps In The Organization’s Corporate Socie

Identify a gap or gaps in the organization’s corporate social responsibility plan.

Create a presentation that will help the organization close the gap or gaps that exist in terms of social responsibility. Be sure to address the following in your presentation: · Identify any ethical issues and legal issues. · Identify how the issues violate utilitarianism, social contract theory, or Kant’s categorical imperative principles. · Identify the stakeholders affected by the gap or gaps. · Propose an action plan to help bridge the gap or gaps and improve the company's relationship with its stakeholders. · Discuss the checks and balances that are required and why. · Explain how your action plan will benefit the organization overall and why it is necessary. · Propose Next Steps. · Wrap up your presentation with a conclusion. A minimum of 4 references should be used to reinforce your thoughts. Be sure to include these both as in-text citations on your slides and on your reference slide. Use the Notes section within PowerPoint to expand your thoughts.

Paper For Above instruction

The organization I have chosen for this analysis is the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), renowned for its efforts in wildlife conservation and environmental protection. Despite its reputable standing, an identified gap in WWF's corporate social responsibility (CSR) plan involves the insufficient emphasis on addressing the illegal wildlife trade's social and economic drivers. This gap potentially undermines the organization's long-term conservation objectives and stakeholder trust. Addressing this gap necessitates a comprehensive understanding of associated ethical and legal issues, stakeholder impact, and how integrating ethical principles can reinforce responsible practices.

Ethical and Legal Issues

The primary ethical concern revolves around the role of illegal wildlife trade, which undermines global biodiversity and perpetuates criminal activities with societal harm. Legally, these activities often involve violations of international treaties like CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species) and national laws, exposing organizations and individuals involved to sanctions. The dissemination of awareness and proactive engagement with law enforcement are crucial ethical imperatives that WWF must strengthen to uphold legal compliance and moral responsibility.

Violation of Ethical Principles

The disregard for legal frameworks and the continued trade in endangered species contravenes Kant’s categorical imperative, which demands individuals to act according to universal moral laws that respect the intrinsic worth of species. Similarly, the principles of utilitarianism are violated when the suffering caused by these trades leads to a reduction in overall happiness, affecting ecosystems and human communities reliant on biodiversity. The social contract theory is also compromised, as businesses and organizations are expected to uphold societal norms and laws that promote mutual well-being.

Stakeholders Affected

Various stakeholders are impacted by this gap, including local communities that depend on biodiversity for their livelihoods, governments enforcing conservation laws, NGOs like WWF, consumers of wildlife products, and the global ecological community. Failure to address illegal trade not only jeopardizes species survival but also tarnishes the credibility and social license of organizations involved, diminishing stakeholder trust and engagement.

Action Plan to Bridge the Gap

To mitigate this gap, I propose an integrated action plan emphasizing increased collaboration with law enforcement agencies, development of community-based conservation programs, and consumer education campaigns. WWF should invest in advanced monitoring technologies like AI and satellite imaging for real-time tracking of illegal trade routes. Engaging local communities by providing sustainable livelihood options will address economic drivers, fostering community stewardship. Furthermore, launching global awareness initiatives can reduce demand for illegal wildlife products.

Checks and Balances

Implementing robust oversight mechanisms such as third-party audits and transparent reporting protocols is essential to ensure accountability. Establishing a dedicated ethical oversight committee within WWF can monitor compliance with legal standards and ethical practices. Regular stakeholder audits and feedback channels will maintain ongoing oversight, enabling adaptive management and continuous improvement.

Organizational Benefits and Necessity

This action plan aligns with WWF’s mission; by actively combatting illegal trade, the organization not only enhances its reputation but also ensures the longevity of its conservation impact. Strengthening ethical commitments fosters stakeholder trust, attracts funding, and encourages partnerships. Addressing the gap is necessary to uphold the moral responsibility of conserving biodiversity and maintaining ecological integrity for future generations.

Next Steps

The immediate next steps involve conducting a stakeholder analysis to identify key partners, developing a detailed implementation timeline, and securing funding. Launching pilot projects in high-risk regions will provide insights into effective strategies, which can be scaled up regionally and globally. Regular review meetings should be scheduled to monitor progress and adapt strategies accordingly.

Conclusion

Closing the identified gap in WWF’s CSR regarding illegal wildlife trade requires a comprehensive, ethically grounded approach. By aligning actions with moral principles, engaging stakeholders, and implementing transparent oversight, WWF can reinforce its leadership role in conservation and social responsibility, ensuring more impactful and sustainable outcomes.

References

• Bishop, J. (2017). Wildlife Crime. Cambridge University Press.
• CITES. (1973). Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.
• Habibi, N., et al. (2018). The business of wildlife trafficking: ethical considerations and legal compliance. Journal of Environmental Law, 30(2), 231-258.
• Nowell, K., & Snow, C. (2010). The Wildlife Trafficking Crisis. TRAFFIC International.
• Rosen, G. E., et al. (2014). The Illegal Wildlife Trade: Threats and Responses. Bioscience, 64(12), 1117-1129.
• United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2018). Transnational Organized Crime in Biological Resources.
• World Wildlife Fund (WWF). (2022). Annual Report 2022: Conservation in Action.
• Wyatt, T. (2013). Trading in Extinction: The Illegal Wildlife Trade. Routledge.
• Wildlife Conservation Society. (2019). Combatting Illegal Wildlife Trade: Strategies for NGOs and Governments.
• Zhou, Q., et al. (2019). Ethical dimensions of wildlife conservation: A review. Conservation Biology, 33(4), 789-798.