Identify The Independent And Dependent Variables 477426

Identify the independent variable and dependent variable, and analyze

In this assignment, the focus is on understanding the key components of experimental research designs through the provided scenario involving a study on insomnia and pill effects. The primary goal is to identify the independent and dependent variables, determine the number and nature of their levels, and analyze the research design employed. Additionally, the assignment involves conceptualizing a third condition in the study and interpreting the implications of a possible significant F-value from an analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Within experimental research, the independent variable (IV) is the factor manipulated by the researcher to observe its effect on the outcome, while the dependent variable (DV) is the behavior or response measured to assess the impact of the IV. In the insomnia study, the IV is the information provided about the pill's effects, as this is what the researchers manipulate to observe any influence on sleep onset. The DV is the time taken for participants to fall asleep after taking the pill, as this measures the effect of the information on sleep behavior.

The study begins with two levels of the IV: (1) participants told the pill will make them sleepy, and (2) participants told it will make them alert. These levels reflect different instructions given to examine the effect of expectancy on sleep onset. A third level is proposed, where participants receive no information about the pill's effects, serving as a control condition. This addition allows researchers to compare the influence of expectation against a neutral baseline.

Regarding the research design, the study appears to employ a between-participants design because different groups of participants are assigned to each instruction condition. Each participant is exposed to only one set of instructions, and the groups are independent of one another. This conclusion is based on the description that participants are randomly assigned to different instruction groups, which is characteristic of a between-participants design. In contrast, a within-participants or repeated-measures design would involve the same participants experiencing all conditions, which is not indicated here.

If a third condition were added, where participants are not given any information about the pill's effects, the study would then include three conditions: (1) told sleepy, (2) told alert, and (3) no information. Conducting an ANOVA on the data from these conditions would determine if there are statistically significant differences in sleep onset times across them. A significant F-value (p

In essence, this exercise emphasizes the importance of clearly identifying variables, understanding research design types, and interpreting statistical outcomes within experimental studies. Recognizing the role of the independent variable levels and their control conditions enables researchers to establish causal inferences, provided the study is properly designed and analyzed (Stangor, 2015). The interpretation of a significant F-value in ANOVA underlines the importance of effect testing in experimental research, helping to isolate the influence of manipulations like expectancy on health outcomes such as sleep.

References

• Stangor, C. (2015). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (5th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
• Field, A. P. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage.
• Gravetter, F. J., & Forzano, L. B. (2018). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Kazdin, A. E. (2017). Research design in clinical psychology (5th ed.). Pearson.
• Boneau, C. A. (1958). The design of experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 55(4), 261–266.
• McGuigan, F. J. (2020). Experimental design and analysis. Routledge.
• Wilkinson, L., & Taskforce on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals. American Psychologist, 54(8), 594–604.
• Hulley, S. B., Cummings, S. R., Browner, W. S., et al. (2013). Designing clinical research (4th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
• Charness, N., & Gerstmann, J. (2012). Experimental methods in psychological research. Oxford University Press.
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.