IHP 323 Health Promotion Activity Rubric Requirements Of Sub

Ihp 323 Health Promotion Activity Rubricrequirements Of Submissionsho

Short paper assignments must follow these formatting guidelines: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and discipline-appropriate citations. Page length requirements: 3–4 pages.

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment requires a comprehensive short paper that adheres to specific formatting standards, including double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and proper discipline-appropriate citations. The paper should be between three to four pages in length, demonstrating a thorough understanding of health promotion concepts and effective communication.

In developing this paper, students must thoroughly explore all main elements and requirements associated with health promotion activities, providing multiple examples to substantiate each point. The analysis should reflect an in-depth understanding of various health promotion concepts, integrating course material effectively. The discussion should include a clear demonstration that the student comprehends how different elements interconnect within the context of health promotion strategies.

Critical to the paper is the proper application of course concepts; students should correctly utilize theories, models, and frameworks learned during the course to evaluate and propose health promotion activities. Incorporating a variety of scholarly resources is essential, reflecting both depth and breadth of research. This not only enhances credibility but also provides a robust foundation for the analysis and recommendations presented.

The paper must also convincingly argue for a specific method or technology as the most effective approach to delivering health promotion. This might include data, case studies, or examples that demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed method. While explaining alternative options is acceptable, the primary focus should be on convincingly advocating for the chosen approach, illustrating its advantages and potential impact.

Writing mechanics are critical: the paper must be free of organizational, grammatical, and stylistic errors, demonstrating clarity, coherence, and professionalism. Proper citation of sources using discipline-specific formats is essential throughout the document.

References

  • Green, L. W., & Kreuter, M. W. (2005). Health Promotion Planning: An Educational and Environmental Approach. McGraw-Hill.
  • Ogden, J. (2019). Health psychology: A textbook. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Rimer, B. K., & Viswanath, K. (Eds.). (2009). Social and Behavioral Foundations of Public Health. Jossey-Bass.
  • Glanz, K., Rimer, B. K., & Viswanath, K. (2015). Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. Jossey-Bass.
  • CDC. (2021). Health Promotion & Education Strategies. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/healthcommunication/HealthEdStrategicPlan.html
  • Anderson, L., & Funnell, M. (2010). Patient empowerment: Myths and misconceptions. Patient Education and Counseling, 79(3), 277–282.
  • NCHEC. (2015). National Commission for Health Education Credentialing, Inc. Code of Ethics for the Certified Health Education Specialist. https://www.nchec.org/ethics
  • World Health Organization. (2020). Health promotion strategies in practice. WHO Publications. https://www.who.int/health-topics/health-promotion
  • Resnicow, K., Baranowski, T., Ahluwalia, J. S., & Braithwaite, R. L. (1999). Cultural sensitivity in dietary behavior human research. Journal of Health Education & Behavior, 26(4), 445–459.
  • Salmon, P., & Loewenthal, D. (2014). Understanding health promotion in practice. Routledge.

Related Assignments